Quick Note: Intel Wants to Sell OnCue Internet TV Service for $500M
November 26, 2013 12:40 PM
comment(s) - last by
Intel wants to close the deal by the end of the year
Intel is trying to sell off its OnCue online pay-TV service for a reported $500 million and wants to complete the deal by the end of the year. Unnamed sources cited by
claim that Verizon Communications is one of the potential buyers of OnCue.
Intel has offered no official comment on the deal.
The main attraction of OnCue is its ability to deliver pay-TV programming over any high-speed internet connection without the need for a dedicated cable line. Intel has pumped a lot of resources – including dedicated hardware and software platforms -- into OnCue, but has faced challenges getting off the ground.
One of the big reasons the service failed according to industry sources is due to costs.
sources claim that licensing for paid programming cost Intel hundred of millions of dollars upfront under the terms Intel was able to get the chipmaker would have needed to outlay hundreds of millions of dollars up front regardless of whether the service was a hit or not with customers.
Intel CEO Brian Krzanich decided that the internet TV arm was a distraction for the company and has decided to make a
major push into mobile
internet-connected devices instead
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
11/26/2013 1:41:33 PM
Both Intel and MS (and supposedly Apple) have bet large on being able to provide a 'cable killer' service to customers. It seems that Intel is now folding, and MS has been hedging their bets on making the worlds most expensive IR Blaster rather than their own service.
I wonder if Apple will ever unveil something, or if the cable service providers have won this time around.
11/26/2013 2:38:55 PM
The content providers are the root problem. They want to be able to sell thier crap channels to the cable company along with the channels people actually watch, forcing the consumer to pay for content 95% of us never watch. Content provider sells advertising on the channel, and collects money from the Cable company and PROFIT. Why would they change this?
11/26/2013 7:47:48 PM
It's a bit misleading to say consumer are paying for content they don't watch.
Once a cable/sat company installs the ability to broadcast 500 channels, they barely save anything from a consumer only wanting 1 channel. Some popular channels have the leverage to charge significant subscriber fees, but most of the channels people don't watch cost providers almost nothing.
Same thing with content providers. The crappy channels have negligible running costs for Viacom, Time Warner, etc. Their goal is to maximize revenue with whatever pricing scheme they can get away with. Selling channels a la carte is unlikely to save you anything once they adjust prices.
Until a significant portion of the population stops ordering cable/satellite (and it may well happen in the next decade) and becomes a market worth luring back in, both content providers and cable/sat companies are more worried about existing customers switching to online. They'll resist it until they have no choice.
"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone
Intel Creates New Division for Internet-Connected Devices
November 6, 2013, 9:21 AM
Intel Shake-Up to Focus on Mobile, New Devices
May 22, 2013, 11:04 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information