backtop


Print 42 comment(s) - last by Captain Awesom.. on Dec 4 at 1:07 PM

No word on when the aggressive roll out will begin

Many automakers are integrating start-stop technology into their non-hybrid vehicles in an attempt to improve fuel efficiency as much as possible. This technology allows the car to automatically turn the engine off when the vehicle is stopped at a light or parked for an extended period. When the driver steps on the gas, the engine automatically starts back up.
 
Since start-stop helps to improve overall fuel efficiency of a vehicle, Ford is looking to integrate the technology throughout its product portfolio.
 
"We're going to be aggressive rolling it out," said Raj Nair, Ford's global product development chief.


Ford's next generation Mustang is likely to have start-stop available at least as an option [Image Source: Car and Driver]
 
While Nair didn’t offer specifics on what vehicles would be the next to offer the technology, Ford's start-stop tech is expected to be offered on many of its vehicles, including the top selling F-150 truck. For now, the only non-hybrid vehicle in the Ford lineup with available start-stop is the 2013 Ford Fusion ($295 option).
 
Ford believes that the start-stop feature can save drivers $1,100 in fuel costs over five years.  By Ford's estimates, it would take over a year for drivers to save enough in fuel to offset the option's cost.
 
However, Nair says that the current purchase rate for the option is low because people don't yet understand the value/fuel savings it provides.

Source: AutoNews



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

OK I'll ask the question -
By Dr of crap on 11/25/2013 12:51:15 PM , Rating: 0
$1100 over 5 years, so approx. $225 -$250 per YEAR of gas savings. Do the math about 5 gallons per month is saved.

Then you factor in the comments about the temp INSIDE the car when the engine shuts off,
Then you factor in the complication factor of having this installed in cars and the POSSIBLITY of it breaking,

AND the question is WHY do it at all?
The savings is just not there!

I see this as something that will be tried and the masses will reject it.




RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By Fallen Kell on 11/25/2013 2:25:28 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. Especially in my case. My typical commute involves 1 stop sign, and 4 traffic lights for my entire 50 miles of driving a day.


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By marvdmartian on 11/25/2013 3:22:58 PM , Rating: 2
I see it being just a matter of time before someone offers a 3rd party hack of the system, that will allow drivers to disable it. Since everything is controlled through the car's computer these days, it shouldn't be too difficult.

My question, concerning the technology, is that they've been telling us for years that, unlike carburated cars that could save gas by shutting off the engine when sitting, it wasn't necessary for fuel injected vehicles, and wouldn't save any gas. Now they're saying it will? I mean, I understand that if the engine isn't running, it's not consuming gas, but what's the REAL savings, versus the extra wear and tear of the on/off cycle?

Also, I don't see this saving much during the hot summers in the southwestern states. Sorry, but the A/C is working full time, when it's 110 degrees outside, to keep my car cool. Shutting off the compressor is NOT an option!


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By fic2 on 11/25/2013 5:07:23 PM , Rating: 2
It is very easy to disable - just don't buy that OPTION.


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By futrtrubl on 11/26/2013 8:13:32 AM , Rating: 2
Or just push the button to dissable it. Or if that isn't permanent get your local service technician (or do it yourself) to turn it off in the cars computer.


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By Spuke on 11/26/2013 3:36:32 PM , Rating: 2
Service techs can't turn this off. It takes a software hack to do it. BTW, in very hot and very cold temps, the system does not activate, at least not in my wife's car.


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By Monkey's Uncle on 11/25/2013 3:40:35 PM , Rating: 3
Start/Stop has been around for a while now -- mostly on hybrids.

So saving $225-$250 is not worth it? Perhaps not when looked at as personal savings, but what about half a million people using this technology and saving that much?

$125M is nothing to sneeze at. $125M worth of gas is an awful lot of gas that was not used. $125M worth of gas would keep me, my kid and my grand kids and their grandkids driving for the rest of their lives and still have a lot left over for aunts, uncles, cousins...


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By MadMan007 on 11/27/2013 12:27:34 AM , Rating: 2
So you say it may not be worth it on a personal level, then aggregate the savings over a large population, then take that aggregate number and reapply it to a personal level. Logic fail.


RE: OK I'll ask the question -
By Jeffk464 on 11/25/2013 3:48:20 PM , Rating: 2
5 gallons a month, times how many millions of cars, ads up to a lot of barrels of oil that we don't have to import.


"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki