Owner of Lavabit Faces $10K Fine For Protecting His Users From Federal Spying
November 13, 2013 12:14 PM
comment(s) - last by
Protecting your customers may lead to big penalties in today's police state
Ladar Levison had a thriving business. His encrypted email service was heavily used by corporate users that valued protecting their trade secrets. The Obama administration, however, stepped in and crushed this American success story.
I. Feds Demand Lavabit Hand Over Keys to All its Corporate Customers' Communications, Opening the Door for Corporate Espionage
Mr. Levison had a client whose name today is well known --
. It is perhaps unsurprising that a man who was smart enough to
dupe supposed computer espionage experts into giving up their logins
would be savvy enough to find a well encrypted email service to protect his work while he prepared to
blow the lid off the Obama administration's
unprecedented campaign of spying
After it was revealed that the Obama administration was
nullifying the Constitutional protections against search and seizure
in order to execute warrantless seizures of
the metadata of America's law abiding majority
, the administration struck back. Members of Congress, including numerous Republicans that showed a surprising solidarity with the Democratic President,
labeled Edward Snowden a “traitor”
Ladar Levison was forced to abandon his thriving email business to protect his users from spying by the Obama administration. [Image Source: D Magazine]
In the aftermath, one of the Snowden reports carelessly showed his email --
revealing he had a Lavabit address
. Now President Obama and his bipartisan backers had a new victim to sink the teeth of the judicial system into.
Mr. Levison was ordered not just to hand over Mr. Snowden's encryption keys, but the keys of all of his users -- every single one.
Mr. Levison was faced with a tough choice. He could give the government the keys, which federal officials could potentially use to conduct corporate espionage on behalf of their campaign donors without the victims or public ever knowing. That was choice A. Or he could defy the order and face imprisonment under the provision of
50 USC § 1861
18 USC § 2703
(which define the federal government's rights to unconstitutional seizures) and
50 USC § 1881a
(which defines the punishment for exercising ones Constitutional rights and refusing to comply to said seizures). That was choice B.
Instead he opted for choice C -- to act in civil disobedience while being careful not to directly defy the legal statutes of the
Act. He allegedly ducked out his back door when he first saw federal agents coming to his home, denying them a chance to deliver a subpoena.
The Obama administration's FISA court was not happy with this action.
It held Mr. Levison in contempt of court and authorized the
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations
(FBI) to install malware on Mr. Levison's servers --
-- and fine him $5,000 for every day he did not turn over his customers' encryption keys.
Mr. Levison exercised his Constitutional rights and waited two days, before defiantly delivering a printout of the keys printed in size 4 font. But by then he'd already shut down his business and purged his servers, leaving nothing for the feds to collect.
Mr. Levison stated in a brief release, "[I refuse] to become complicit in crimes against the American people."
written an excellent in-depth story
about the scuffle and an interview with Mr. Levison.
II. I Fought the Law and I Won -- But It Cost Me
The Obama administration was outraged at that refusal.
The U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) briefly considered seeking his imprisonment, according to sources. But after Mr. Levison
collected $100,000 USD
in donations to support a legal defense, the DOJ declined to seek prison time for Mr. Levison's acts of civil disobedience. Instead it opted to just punish Mr. Levison with the financial penalty stated in the original contempt order -- a fine of $10,000 USD.
Mr. Levison refused to accept even that punishment. He has appealed the fine to the
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
in Richmond, Virginia, arguing his Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure were violated. He asserts that his business was founded on U.S. privacy and that the government was behaving illegally when it order him to violate all of his users privacy by handing over everyone's encryption keys, in order to allegedly target just one user.
The DOJ is fighting back, looking to nail Mr. Levison with the $10,000 fine. In a just-filed appellate brief it
Mr. Levison [illegally] alerted all of Lavabit’s users, including the target of the investigation, that Lavabit was engaged in litigation with the government and that, rather than comply with the court’s orders, he decided to shut down his business.
The pen/trap order and the search warrant issued by the district court were plainly lawful. The information used by Lavabit to encrypt communications on its systems, what has been referred to as SSL or encryption keys, was both necessary to the installation and operation of a lawfully ordered pen register/trap and trace device as well as subject to disclosure pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703. As such, it was within the district court's power to compel the production of those keys.
Lavabit Government Reply Brief (PDF)
Lavabit Government Reply Brief (Text)
It remains to be seen whether the appellate judges will uphold the $10,000 fine. But for now the worst is presumably over and Mr. Levison can celebrate victory to an extent. He won. His client's data is safe from the Obama's administration's PATRIOT Act seizure attempt. And despite that he's a free man.
Yet the victory is also bitter and Pyrrhic. Lavabit was a thriving business. Now it is but a memory, in an era where
digital privacy is slowly becoming illegal
in the U.S. as Big Brother tightens his grip.
U.S. Appellate Brief
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: All the keys ?!?!
11/14/2013 8:33:14 AM
To be fair, Reclaimer was talking more of the first (2008) election, when Obama ran against McCain, and you responded with Romney, who was the 2nd (2012) re-election of Obama.
Obama was elected in 2008 for no bigger reason than backlash to the W. Bush era. Doesn't really matter who would've run as the Republican candidate that year, they didn't stand a chance against ANY strong Democratic candidate. Hell, they could've put someone in the running who had a ton of skeletons in their closet, and that person still woudl've won (and they damn near did, with Hillary).
In 2012, Obama had 4 years in office, had successfully rammed through the ACA (Obamacare), as well as a bunch of other social programs (phone giveaways, etc), and basically bought the election by buying votes with freebies. If he'd been judged on his REAL accomplishments, or if we had seen the rollout of Obamacare debacle we're seeing now, before that election, I doubt he would have won.
This is why Democrats are going crazy right now, because they're seeing themselves backed into a corner....either Obama "fixes" the mess (which I can't see happening, without violating the law), or they're forced to vote in favor of the Republican-led bill that's to be voted on tomorrow. Anyone who opposes it, irregardless of whether it's a good and sensible change to the law or not, will be looked upon as an obstructionist, and their popularity with the voters will suffer.
In fact, I suspect that the Republican party is going to gain back a lot of the popularity they lost during the budget idiocy in October, with this bill in November. Time will tell!
"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher
NSA Employees Gave Edward Snowden Login Credentials, Passwords
November 8, 2013, 10:37 AM
NSA "Assumes" Americans Are Foreigners, Seizes Millions of Email Contacts Lists
October 15, 2013, 3:16 PM
Snowden Leak: An Intelligence Contractor Costs Ten Times as Much as a Bureaucrat
August 30, 2013, 8:22 AM
Death Before Dishonor: Secure Email Services Close to Avoid U.S. Spying
August 9, 2013, 11:40 AM
Report: FBI Turning to Cybercriminal Tactics to Spy on "Suspects"
August 2, 2013, 7:10 PM
Tech's Biggest Loser on Tax Day: eBay Pays Nearly 99 Percent Tax Rate
April 15, 2015, 3:28 PM
Death and Dragons -- Report Claims Game of Thrones Hit by Piracy "Tidal Wave"
April 10, 2015, 8:37 AM
Court Blocks Twitter and YouTube in Turkey After Pro-Communist Attack in Istanbul
April 6, 2015, 10:53 AM
In Graphics and Quotes: $10.4 Billion Charter & Bright House Merger
April 2, 2015, 5:19 PM
WSJ Report Implies That Google Leveraged Lobbying to Kill Antitrust Abuse Probe
March 25, 2015, 5:37 PM
Nationalist Hackers From Turkey Cause Chaos, Deface Dozens of Sites
March 16, 2015, 12:29 PM
Most Popular Articles
Windows 10 Build 10056 -- What's New in the Latest Leak
April 13, 2015, 10:38 PM
TSMC Hypes Its Upcoming 10 nm Process, Amid Struggles to Hit Volume at 16 nm
April 10, 2015, 7:57 PM
Sharp Unveils World's First "4K" Phone Display at Mind-Boggling 806 PPI
April 13, 2015, 11:24 AM
Tech's Biggest Loser on Tax Day: eBay Pays Nearly 99 Percent Tax Rate
April 15, 2015, 3:28 PM
In California Hippies, Religious Right Find Common Enemy in Vaccine Science
April 9, 2015, 4:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information