Print 97 comment(s) - last by hifloor.. on Nov 19 at 4:02 AM

Protecting your customers may lead to big penalties in today's police state

Ladar Levison had a thriving business.  His encrypted email service was heavily used by corporate users that valued protecting their trade secrets.  The Obama administration, however, stepped in and crushed this American success story.
I. Feds Demand Lavabit Hand Over Keys to All its Corporate Customers' Communications, Opening the Door for Corporate Espionage
Mr. Levison had a client whose name today is well known -- Edward Snowden.  It is perhaps unsurprising that a man who was smart enough to dupe supposed computer espionage experts into giving up their logins would be savvy enough to find a well encrypted email service to protect his work while he prepared to blow the lid off the Obama administration's unprecedented campaign of spying.
After it was revealed that the Obama administration was nullifying the Constitutional protections against search and seizure in order to execute warrantless seizures of the metadata of America's law abiding majority, the administration struck back.  Members of Congress, including numerous Republicans that showed a surprising solidarity with the Democratic President, labeled Edward Snowden a “traitor”.

Ladar Levison
Ladar Levison was forced to abandon his thriving email business to protect his users from spying by the Obama administration.  [Image Source: D Magazine]

In the aftermath, one of the Snowden reports carelessly showed his email -- revealing he had a Lavabit address.  Now President Obama and his bipartisan backers had a new victim to sink the teeth of the judicial system into.
Mr. Levison was ordered not just to hand over Mr. Snowden's encryption keys, but the keys of all of his users -- every single one.
Mr. Levison was faced with a tough choice.  He could give the government the keys, which federal officials could potentially use to conduct corporate espionage on behalf of their campaign donors without the victims or public ever knowing.  That was choice A.  Or he could defy the order and face imprisonment under the provision of 50 USC § 1861/18 USC § 2703 (which define the federal government's rights to unconstitutional seizures) and 50 USC § 1881a (which defines the punishment for exercising ones Constitutional rights and refusing to comply to said seizures).  That was choice B.
Instead he opted for choice C -- to act in civil disobedience while being careful not to directly defy the legal statutes of the USA PATRIOT Act.  He allegedly ducked out his back door when he first saw federal agents coming to his home, denying them a chance to deliver a subpoena.
The Obama administration's FISA court was not happy with this action.
It held Mr. Levison in contempt of court and authorized the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) to install malware on Mr. Levison's servers -- R -- and fine him $5,000 for every day he did not turn over his customers' encryption keys.
Mr. Levison exercised his Constitutional rights and waited two days, before defiantly delivering a printout of the keys printed in size 4 font.  But by then he'd already shut down his business and purged his servers, leaving nothing for the feds to collect.
Mr. Levison stated in a brief release, "[I refuse] to become complicit in crimes against the American people."
D Magazine has written an excellent in-depth story about the scuffle and an interview with Mr. Levison.
II. I Fought the Law and I Won -- But It Cost Me
The Obama administration was outraged at that refusal.  The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) briefly considered seeking his imprisonment, according to sources.  But after Mr. Levison collected $100,000 USD in donations to support a legal defense, the DOJ declined to seek prison time for Mr. Levison's acts of civil disobedience.  Instead it opted to just punish Mr. Levison with the financial penalty stated in the original contempt order -- a fine of $10,000 USD.
Mr. Levison refused to accept even that punishment.  He has appealed the fine to the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, arguing his Fourth Amendment protections against search and seizure were violated.  He asserts that his business was founded on U.S. privacy and that the government was behaving illegally when it order him to violate all of his users privacy by handing over everyone's encryption keys, in order to allegedly target just one user.
The DOJ is fighting back, looking to nail Mr. Levison with the $10,000 fine.  In a just-filed appellate brief it writes:

Mr. Levison [illegally] alerted all of Lavabit’s users, including the target of the investigation, that Lavabit was engaged in litigation with the government and that, rather than comply with the court’s orders, he decided to shut down his business.

The pen/trap order and the search warrant issued by the district court were plainly lawful. The information used by Lavabit to encrypt communications on its systems, what has been referred to as SSL or encryption keys, was both necessary to the installation and operation of a lawfully ordered pen register/trap and trace device as well as subject to disclosure pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703. As such, it was within the district court's power to compel the production of those keys.


It remains to be seen whether the appellate judges will uphold the $10,000 fine.  But for now the worst is presumably over and Mr. Levison can celebrate victory to an extent.  He won.  His client's data is safe from the Obama's administration's PATRIOT Act seizure attempt.  And despite that he's a free man.

Yet the victory is also bitter and Pyrrhic.  Lavabit was a thriving business.  Now it is but a memory, in an era where digital privacy is slowly becoming illegal in the U.S. as Big Brother tightens his grip.

Sources: U.S. Appellate Brief, D Magazine

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By half_duplex on 11/13/2013 8:28:00 PM , Rating: 1

Basic summary of the way Reclaimer77 is acting. Props to those keeping a level head in the "conversation".

He's not the one who isn't backing up his assertions in this conversation, the Obama voters are. So far, I've heard how Mass sucked, FOX News sucks, Romney sucks... but I've yet to hear one iota of WHY they suck.

I can tell you why Obama sucks.

1) He forced the ACA on the country, and it's now a shit storm, and people are losing their health care.
2) He's mishandled Iran to the point that Israel is going to probably end up bombing them.
3) He's continued EVERY policy that his supporters hated Bush for.
4) He pushed through massive stimulus as soon as he got into office.
5) His IRS singled out opposing political groups, and got a pass.
6) His DOJ has investigated/intimidated journalist from Fox, AP, etc.
7) He mishandled a deadly attack on a US embassy, a possible cover up.
8) Unemployment is still up.
9) Solendra as well as other solar companies.

The list goes on and on. Name one other president with a rap sheet that even comes close to this? And people like you and the other guy have let him skate on ALL of it.

We've all made errors in judgement when voting, but at some point you have to admit this is getting pretty insane.

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By inperfectdarkness on 11/14/2013 6:20:10 AM , Rating: 2
You make a great point. I don't even think Hoover was that bad by comparison...and the Great Depression started under his watch (not that he really was at fault for that). Yet Obama got elected and Hoover did not. Just saying.

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By Zshazz on 11/14/13, Rating: 0
RE: All the keys ?!?!
By SilthDraeth on 11/15/2013 12:50:24 AM , Rating: 2
1. He did know since he made the provision after the ACA was passed that would end up causing health care to be lost. So yes he knew, and it was purposeful.

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By hifloor on 11/19/2013 4:02:40 AM , Rating: 2
That wasn't Obama, it's the insurance companies. And the sell-out the Republicans made in rewriting it over and over to the point that it only favors the insurance companies.

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By JediJeb on 11/15/2013 5:25:01 PM , Rating: 2
Democrats are not the friends to the common man that they are made out to be. I think this revelation is too much for the individuals who typically lean that way to bear, so they ignore it.

Interesting bit of information that I learned this week in our training for lab work in pharma. When the first law was passed to help protect consumers against fraudulent drugs and harmful food additives only 8 Democrats voted against it. That was back in the early 1900's, seems the Party for the common man even back then was not so supportive as it should have been.

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By Reclaimer77 on 11/14/2013 4:31:06 PM , Rating: 1

Notice how they're talking about everything besides Obama's failed record? Shame on me for once again letting Liberal morons set the tone of a debate. Romney's theoretical Presidential record is not what should be relevant here, it's certainly not as germane as the proven disaster Obama has been as President.

But this is typical of the pro-Obama crowd. The President refuses to take responsibility for anything, so why should they? Blame Bush, blame Fox News, flame Romney or the corporations or the banks, whoever, but absolutely NEVER hold Obama accountable for anything. Oh heavens no, we can't do that.

RE: All the keys ?!?!
By tamalero on 11/15/2013 4:24:53 AM , Rating: 3
As a Neutral from another country.. I see No difference from the Republican camp. All blame, zero solutions.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki