backtop


Print 31 comment(s) - last by mario t.. on Nov 14 at 11:40 AM

Array matches solar panel efficiency, operates in microwave range

It's been a while since Nikola Tesla -- one of the greatest inventors mankind has ever known -- claimed to demonstrate wireless power transfer in 1891.  Mr. Tesla even claimed to drive an electric car on wireless power in the 1930s, recording a top speed of 90 miles per hour in his lab notebooks -- a feat that would put it on par with the best gasoline engines of the time.  In his notebooks he claimed to have achieved 95 percent efficiency in transmitting the power over radio frequencies -- an incredible accomplishment, if true.
 
I. Tesla's Wireless Power -- A Cen
 
But what would drive conspiracy theorists for decades to lose sleep was what happened at Wardenclyffe tower.  Mr. Tesla had scored a believer in banker JP Morgan, but in 1917 the banker (the father of today's JPMorgan Chase & Comp. (JPM)) inexplicably withdrew support without disclosing why.  The prevalent line of thinking since was that Mr. Tesla had failed in his bold vision of wireless power transformation.  Or maybe Mr. Morgan discovered the tower's true purpose -- that Mr. Tesla hoped to use it to transfer power around the world -- and was angered by being lured by more modest promises.  

Wardenclyffe demolition
Wardenclyffe Tower was demolished, putting an end to wireless power dreams for almost a century. [Image Source: The Oatmeal]

Mr. Tesla's efforts on wireless power quietly died as he turned to other projects.  And as almost every occasional scientist who investigated these stories throughout the 1960s, 70s, and 80s failed to replicate his results; many simply called them hogwash.
 
But over the last five years something inexplicable has happened.  Wireless power research has reinvented many of the technologies that Mr. Tesla claimed to have built.  The crudest examples are currently the only ones available to the consumer -- induced power between planar coils. This technology is currently being tested at the University of Utah as a means of charging electric vehicles (including electric buses).
 
This technology has been used to charge mobile devices under the Qi standard, which appears in devices by Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) Nokia Devices and the now-defunct Palm brand which sold a wireless charging device dubbed "The Palm Touchstone" [see this teardown for more info].
Palm TouchstoneNokia wireless

Nokia and various Android OEMs have already standardized this technology.  The Qi Wireless Power Consortium is growing fast, but has a major limitation -- it can only charge devices within 4 centimeters of a charger plate, which can be a standalone unit (see above) or built into a table.

Evatran Group Inc. has shown that by using resonant tuning the range of inductive charging can be increased from centimeters (as with Qi) to feet.  It's paired with German automotive giant Robert Bosch GmBH to sell wireless charging base-stations under the "Plugless Power" brand.
 

Plugless Power claims 90 percent efficiency -- approaching the efficiency claimed by Nikola Tesla over a century later.
 
The U.S. Department of Defense and General Motors Comp. (GM) are deploying smoke detectors and clocks that don't need batteries, but are powered by radio waves, according to Fast Company.  
 
Ironically a single man whose home nation lies not far from Mr. Tesla’s home nation of Serbia spearheads these efforts.  When Croatian native Marin Soljacic began his exploration of wireless power at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) many scoffed at the idea.  But soon they weren't laughing when he proved his ideas in peer-reviewed literature and founded a company WiTricity.

WiTricity

WiTricity -- whose technology GM and the DOD are likely tapping -- uses radio wave-driven induction (similar to the methods Tesla used) to drive power over hundreds of feet (or more via resonant boosting stations).  In white papers [PDF] WiTricity explains its technology, which like Plugless Power and Mr. Tesla's is based on magnet fields boosted in range via resonance.


Like Mr. Tesla's work, these fields have shown remarkable efficiencies -- 98 percent or greater per stage and 90 percent or better over multiple stages.  But so far WiTricity -- who is looking for building-scale wireless power deployments aided by repeating resonators that boost the power -- has yet to transmit power over the air.
 
II. Microwave Power
 
But wait, you say, didn't Tesla transmit wireless power over miles, not feet?  Indeed, but here recent technology is breaking through barriers installed by years of disappointments.  This new research is showing that power transfer via microwaves and radio waves is not only possible -- but can be extremely efficient if properly tuned.
 
Duke University Electrical Engineering Professor Steven A. Cummer and his students Alexander ("Alex") Katko (a Ph.D. candidate) and Allen Hawkes (an undergraduate) have published a new paper in the peer-reviewed journal Applied Physics Letters detailing a device that can harvest power from microwave signals.

Duke microwave
Duke engineering students Alexander Katko (left) and Allen Hawkes pose with the power harvesting device. [Image Source: Duke University]

Mr. Katko comments:

It’s possible to use this design for a lot of different frequencies and types of energy, including vibration and sound energy harvesting.  Until now, a lot of work with metamaterials has been theoretical. We are showing that with a little work, these materials can be useful for consumer applications.

The properties of metamaterials allow for design flexibility not possible with ordinary devices like antennas.  When traditional antennas are close to each other in space they talk to each other and interfere with each other’s operation. The design process used to create our metamaterial array takes these effects into account, allowing the cells to work together.

Microwaves -- electromagnetic waves in the 1 Megahertz (MHz) (10^6 Hz) to 1 GHz (10^9 Hz) range -- are most commonly used to cook food (in microwaves that use the 915 MHz band) or carry out radar signaling.  Today perhaps the most common use of microwaves is in wireless data transmission -- for example the 802.11 family of wireless transmission technologies transfers data on the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands (in the microwave range).

Electromagnetic spectrum
[Image Source: CE Essentials]

These waves have wavelengths in the meter to millimeter range.  After visible light and the infrared spectrum, they're the next longest wavelength, followed by radio waves -- the frequencies used by Mr. Tesla purportedly used.
 
The Duke study uses so-called "metamaterials" -- materials that have structures smaller than a target wavelength and are used to create unusual behavior in waves of a certain frequency.
 
You may recall that metamaterials are being investigated as a "cloaking mechanism".  As visible light is in the 390 to 750 nm range, the resonant metamaterials used for optical cloaking (or laser focusinggenerally have to measure 100 nm or below.  By contrast, the metamaterial for this study is much larger as the target frequency is much larger.

Duke metamaterial
The Duke University "metamaterial" RF power harvester. [Image Source: AIP]

The Duke device measures 40 millimeters x 40 millimeters and acts somewhat like an antenna using a split ring resonator (SRR).  Clearly this is much larger than optical metamaterials.  This resonator is designed to harvest a 900 MHz (0.33 m wavelength) signal.  

The resonator is built with simple materials -- copper conductor printed on a fiberglass circuit board, with attached electronic components.  The finished resonator captures power that's directed into it by a large metal wave-guide.  The maximum theoretical efficiency of the captured incident power is 78 percent, but a resonator single cell was only able to harvest 14.2 percent of the incident power.  

Duke University
Efficiency of the device (click to enlarge) [Image Source: AIP]

By coupling five resonators together inside the wave guide, 36.8 percent efficiencies were reached -- roughly half of the maximum theoretical value.  At roughly 17 dBm of input power, a 5 volt output DC open circuit voltage was obtained.  That's enough to drive many electronic devices -- assuming enough current was harvested.

harvest array
Power is increased by adding more SRR harvesters. [Image Source: AIP]

This is better than most commercial solar cells which generally have around a 20 percent efficiency, at best.  To date only multi-junction solar cells have produced >30 percent incident harvest efficiency.

Mr. Hawkes boasts:

We were aiming for the highest energy efficiency we could achieve.  We had been getting energy efficiency around 6 to 10 percent, but with this design we were able to dramatically improve energy conversion to 37 percent, which is comparable to what is achieved in solar cells.
Solar cell efficiencies
Solar cell efficiency records over time (click to enlarge) [Image Source: Wikimedia Commons]

So just how much promise does this hold for power transmission?  Read on for some basic analysis.

III. Long Range Power?  Fundamental Physics Stands in the Way

While that sounds great, the commercialization prospects for now are a bit weaker than it seems on the surface.  The first issue is size -- the array was attached to a metal wave guide is the size of a restaurant serving tray (so not exactly portable).  The second issue is signal strength.  A typical router produces around 22 dBm of output power.  Power generally dissipates quickly, and by the time it gets to you it's at -70 to -90 dBm [source].  So unless you're charging millivolt devices, power from a router won't cut it; you'll likely need a dedicated power base station.


Wireless routers wouldn't produce enough power for the antenna array ot make use of.

That said there's tremendous potential for improvement.  Tesla's work -- if accurate -- suggests that new wave guide designs and different frequnecies may produce much better results.  Chaining together even more cells seems a promising approach as well, as increasing the cell count 5-fold increased the power harvest 2.5-fold.

Tesla's notebooks suggest that his Wardenclyffe tower was capable of producing roughly a 100 Megavolt (MV) (100 million volt = 1e8 volts), roughly 1 KA (kiloamp = 1,000 ampere = 1e3 A) signal.  That would hint that its peak power output might be 1e11 watts (100 Gigawatts (GW)).

Tesla could have harvest power in the radio range using a relatively large "metamaterial" -- possibly meters per side for a signal in the KHz range.  It's unclear whether he did this, but if that could be proven it would demonstrate that he might have been the first inventor to understand and use metamaterials, as they relate to EMF.

But returning to the claims about the Wardenclyffe tower's transmission power, it seems likely they are erroneous or referring to very brief bursts of signal strength.  In terms of a well-document modern comparison, the VLF Transmitter Cutter is often cited as the world's most powerful radio tower and it's only capable of producing 1.8 MW (between 92 and 93 dBm) sustained signals.  The tower operats at 24.0 kHz, thus it has a rough free space wavelength of 12.5 kilometers.
VLF cutter
VLF cutter
VLF Cutter
The VLF Transmitter Cutter, thought to be the world's most powerful radio antenna. [Images Source: Wikimedia Commons]

Here's free-space estimates of the signal strength at various distances:
  • Base --> 92.55 dBm
     
  • Overall Formula for free space power loss (FSPL)
    (4*pi*distance/12.5e3)^2
     
  • Overall Formula for reception power:
    Power_received = Power_transmitted/FSPL
     
  • Signal @ Distance:
    • 1 km --> 92.51 dBm
    • 10 km --> 72.5 dBm
    • 100 km --> 52.51 dBm
    • 1000 km --> 32.51 dBm
In other words if you can develop a wave-guide for 12.5 kHz signals and point it in the direction of the U.S. Navy's radio tower, by my calculations (correct me if I'm wrong), you could get enough signal strength to produce a 10+ volt charging open circuit voltage, based on the team's findings... sort of.
 
The sort of, comes from the fact that once you'd intercepted the signal (effectively sucking its power out of the air) you'd presumably be blocking any other object in your antenna's direct path from receiving power.  The easy way to understand this is imagine if dozens of receivers were situated directly around the tower.  Even if they had 100 percent conversion efficiency (impossible) and intercepted all of the signal (also impossible) they would only harvest 1.8 MW of power.  As the signal dissipates and as the conversion efficiency of the receiver drops, you'll only be able to harvest some fraction of this power -- likely kilowatts or less.
 
In other words, you'd probably need dozens, if not hundreds of similar antennas across the country sucking down massive amounts of power to produce a wireless power transmission scheme capable of power household electronics.
 
And such a scheme would be very wasteful -- as free space power losses build rapidly with distance.  That said, if many such devices were someday deployed (say within every kilometer of an urban location), the convenience might outweigh the power losses in urban areas, at least.

Scotty
As Scotty would say, "You can not change the laws of physics!" [Image Source: Gene Rodenberry]

More likely though, the system could be installed in large buildings to produce power at between 100 meters from broadcast stations or less.  That would minimize the free space losses, giving a receiver a fighting chance if the waveguide is optimized.
 
What does this mean for Nikola Tesla's legacy?  While it's impossible to prove that his wireless power claims were true, it does offer evidence they might have been feasible on some scale.  And for Tesla fans, that adds yet another justification for admiration and conspiracy theorizing alike.

Sources: Applied Physics Letters [PDF], Duke University [press release]



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Tesla was a con-man
By troysavary on 11/12/2013 10:02:27 AM , Rating: -1
When are people going to accept the fact that Tesla made a whole bunch of claims he could not back up? The has been no conspiracy to keep his breakthroughs secret.

Hmm...come to think of it, Musk named his company very appropriately, since he has the same tendency to over-promise.




RE: Tesla was a con-man
By Odysseus145 on 11/12/2013 10:13:50 AM , Rating: 5
Tesla was a brilliant man whose contributions include the induction motor and advocating the use of alternating current to transmit electricity over power lines allowing electrical power to be delivered hundreds of miles away. Like most inventors and scientists though, he wasn't always right. Most scientists errors don't involve huge towers.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By troysavary on 11/12/13, Rating: -1
RE: Tesla was a con-man
By tamalero on 11/12/2013 10:56:10 AM , Rating: 2
telsa.. a con man? haha, you're silly.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By troysavary on 11/12/13, Rating: -1
RE: Tesla was a con-man
By tanjali on 11/12/2013 1:59:12 PM , Rating: 1
LOL.. He's not just silly his deliberate idiot.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By troysavary on 11/12/2013 7:05:47 PM , Rating: 2
That sentence didn't even make sense.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By tanjali on 11/13/2013 9:59:14 AM , Rating: 1
Yes, it does!


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By ipay on 11/13/2013 11:00:31 AM , Rating: 2
No, it doesn't.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By JasonMick (blog) on 11/12/2013 11:04:30 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
I'm not claiming he wasn't brilliant, just that he was also a con-man. He milked fortunes on projects that didn't work, made claims that he couldn't back up, and made excuses for it all.
Most of his career he lived relatively modestly for a man of his post.

He spent most of the money he was able to gather from investors on research.

Your comment seems to suggest he was running some sort of scientific slush fund, which simply was not true. He was attempting incredibly ambitious and imaginative feats of electrical engineering. As impractical as some of these projects may have been and as much as they have been exaggerated by some in the modern era, he did have many solid ideas.

And remember he was operating on the free market. Most of his money came from investors who believed in his work. When they stopped believing (e.g. JP Morgan & Wardenclyffe Tower) they stopped investing. That's the free market. He's hardly a con-man -- he's more of a pure researcher, who was forced to commercialize some of his inventions in order to sustain his love for tinkering and science. His attempts to commercialize his work were met with mixed success as he was a far better showman than businessman, as his unfortunate dealings with Edison illustrate.

But there's no shame in loving to tinker and investigate new topics in science. Tesla was the archetypal university researcher. Like any researcher he emphasized his success and certain highlights -- that's called being a good showman. But to say he was a "con man" seems to suggest he lied about his work, which is simply not true. He may have incorrectly speculated when discussing future experiments, but every researcher does that.

I see no reason why Tesla is a bad person for seeking funding for his research.

He may not have been an Einstein or Maxwell from a theoretical perspective, but then again he had a brilliance when it came to tinkering/engineering that far exceeded most of the best pure theoreticians.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By WoWCow on 11/12/2013 12:21:47 PM , Rating: 2
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla

FYI.

If there was anything to say about Tesla, its that he was a eccentric (and neurotic) engineering inventor who lacked a compassionate and educated backer.

Edison screwed him over badly; see the DC vs. AC electricity debacle and how Edison attempted to dissuade people from AC...

The modern equivalent would probably be Dilbert, where engineering competency (and some sensible compassion and passion for work) is meddled by (possibly incompetent) business decisions.

Then we end up with Wally, the apathetic over-caffeinated engineer.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By inaphasia on 11/13/2013 3:21:20 PM , Rating: 1
Thanx for the link:) Loved it.

Reminded me of a comment I made on DT a few years back where I lumped Jobs, Edison and Sony in douchebag/sociopath/patent troll territory... It got rated down, down, down and someone even called me a hippy! A hippy?


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By JasonMick (blog) on 11/12/2013 10:56:09 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
Tesla was a con-man
I understand where you're coming from, given some of the hyperbole surrounding some of his work (e.g. the brushless motor, which he may have invented, but which others also devised at the same time.)

That said I strongly disagree with you.

It is true that Tesla's work is often misrepresented in that many folks claim said to have "invented" alternating current. But that misrepresentation is hardly his fault; to my knowledge he never made that claim.

The first alternating current application for lighting was developed decades earlier in the 1870s by Pavel Yablochkov, a Russian engineer. The first commercial deployment was created by Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti, an Englishman of Italian descent.

As for his patent on the brushless motor, I understand where the controversy comes from, but I think people should read about Newton and Leibniz and compare the debate over who "invented" integration to many of the debates about what exactly Tesla invented.

Tesla in all likelihood invented or independently devised a whole lot of very important technology, but the problem with science is that often there's only one or two obvious steps given the variables you're working with at the time. Multiple great minds will inevitably come to these answers -- but that does not discredit their work.

Tesla in many ways was more of an engineer than a pure physicist a la Maxwell or Einstein, although his careful keeping of lab notebooks was exemplary for the time.

Of course another issue with Tesla is that so much of his work was lost or unfinished as he explored so many different topics and put forth few finished projects. What he did show and document were often extraordinary implementations for the time -- motors, wireless power transfer, transformers, etc. -- but the applications of his more extreme inventions (e..g the Tesla coil) were unclear, and the means for him to validate his own claims, much less outside observers to validate them at the time were tenuous as best.

So I can understand criticizing the hyperbole, but to call Tesla "con-man" is just sad.

Hype aside, Tesla unquestionably proved himself a high-level genius, a brilliant inventor, a savvy engineer, a great public speaker, and a proud American immigrant.

I'll say this for Tesla, if nothing else -- he's added a lot of intrigue and allure to science and working in a lab over the years. If nothing else his showmanship made science a little less "boring" and attracted many young people to science for decades to come.

If you end up with a legacy as good as that, I wouldn't call you a con-man, even if some people one day came to exaggerate or speculate on some of your work. You can debate his place in the history books, but Tesla was undeniably a great mind of electrical engineering and science in general.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By drlumen on 11/12/2013 11:02:51 AM , Rating: 2
You should really research more into Tesla before making claims that he was a con man. By today's standards your statement makes you look like an Edison fanboy. :)

I liken Tesla's work to the old adage. "I may have taught you everything you know but I didn't teach you everything I know." Tesla was easily an electrical genius and I have no doubt there was more in his head than he let the public know. He had already got hosed by Edison, JP Morgan, General Electric and Westinghouse so no doubt he was protective and a bit paranoid.

The story (don't remember the source) is that JP Morgan stopped funding Wardenclyffe Tower because there was no way to profit from the power. Tesla had intended for the power from the tower to be used freely.

There was also some rumors that people were afraid of it - maybe there were some unforeseen and potential public health issues around the tower's transmissions.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By troysavary on 11/12/2013 6:35:08 PM , Rating: 1
He got hosed by Edison, but not by Morgan. Morgan was funding a radio transmission tower experiment. Tesla was beaten by Morsi, so Morgan stopped funding the project. That is not being "hosed". He was also not treated unfairly by Westinghouse. He was given incredibly generous royalties by Westinghouse, so generous that they were actually threatening to bankrupt Westinghouse, so Westinghouse bought the patent outright for more than $200k, which was a fortune back then. I don't know the relation between GE and Tesla, so I won't comment there. The point is, Tesla was always wasting money on ideas that had no hope of working or no commercial prospects. When it was his money to spend, fine, but when it was investors money, they wisely pulled the plug after a period.


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By TETRONG on 11/13/2013 12:28:28 AM , Rating: 2
Typically one does not "pull the plug" on a project by having the army repeatedly dynamite it into oblivion


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By tanjali on 11/13/2013 10:02:19 AM , Rating: 1
How you know the ideas didn't have hope on?
You are pooling that out of your ass?


RE: Tesla was a con-man
By ipay on 11/13/2013 10:36:18 AM , Rating: 2
Edison was an butte whole of the highest order. Torturing animals because he knew Tesla was right and couldn't admit that to the public. F that guy!


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki