Print 40 comment(s) - last by The Von Matric.. on Nov 11 at 4:28 PM

Take a look at the PS4's innards a week before its release

Only a week before release, we finally get a glimpse of the PlayStation 4's guts -- and it's looking beautiful, both inside and out.

Yasuhiro Ootori, Sony engineering director, conducted an exclusive teardown of the PS4 in a Wired video. Ootori takes it apart piece-by-piece to show exactly what Sony's packing in its latest console.

One of the biggest changes you'll see from PS3 to PS4 is the integrated power adapter. This eliminates the need for a large mass on the outside of the console, making the design cleaner and more convenient. 

Another huge change is the switch to an x86 CPU architecture. This is what's typically used in PCs, meaning that it will be much more developer-friendly than the PS3. While the PS3 touted the powerful the Cell Processor, it made life hard for game developers. 

The video also shows a 500GB hard disk drive; 8GB of GDDR5 memory (eight on each side of the main processor for a total of 8GB); a secondary processor for network processing with low power consumption; two heat pipes for the heat sink; an 85-mm-diameter centrifugal fan, and ports for USB 3.0, Ethernet, HDMI, optical audio output and an AUX connector for the camera. 

The PlayStation 4 is set to release November 15 in the U.S. and November 29 in Europe. It'll be priced at $399. 

The PS4 will be competing with Microsoft's Xbox One this holiday season, which has a November 22 release date in the U.S. and is priced $100 higher than the PS4 at $499. 

Check out Wired's full video here

Sources: Wired [1], [2]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: very simple
By retrospooty on 11/7/2013 1:55:09 PM , Rating: 2
CPU and RAM yes, but GPU? No, not even close. A 2-3 year old mid range card. That would be like a Radeon 5650 with a whopping 25.6GB per second memory bandwidth. The PS4 has 176.0 GB/s which is comparable to todays mid range cards like the 7850. It stacks up well against a mid range PC today... However a high end card is a HUGE bump on a PC.

RE: very simple
By retrospooty on 11/7/2013 1:57:42 PM , Rating: 2
Actually a better comparison would be the R5750@ about 75 GB/s Closer, but still not as fast as PS4.

RE: very simple
By Nortel on 11/7/2013 4:18:41 PM , Rating: 2

In 2010 they released the GeForce 580 with 192.4GB/S memory bandwidth. That was quite awhile ago...

Additionally, using memory bandwidth as a benchmark is insane. It has almost no baring on computational speed. A modern GeForce 760 has 192GB/S and is under $250. This card is way faster compared to what the ps4 packs.

RE: very simple
By Reclaimer77 on 11/7/2013 4:43:37 PM , Rating: 3
A modern GeForce 760 has 192GB/S and is under $250. This card is way faster compared to what the ps4 packs.

And it costs more than half of the entire console alone. Hello?

RE: very simple
By Nortel on 11/8/2013 11:21:44 AM , Rating: 2
A computer can do a hell of a lot more compared to a console. Additionally, anyone who has a console has a computer as well. Simply budget for a $250 graphics card, add to any modern low/mid end computer and you have a gaming machine which trounces the ps4/xbone.

RE: very simple
By ianweck on 11/8/2013 6:38:06 PM , Rating: 2
WTF are you guys even arguing about anymore?

RE: very simple
By retrospooty on 11/7/2013 9:18:28 PM , Rating: 2
That was the high end card. This whole thing started talking about mid range, in fact YOU said it.

RE: very simple
By Omega215D on 11/7/2013 4:52:56 PM , Rating: 2
I dunno, my GeForce GTX 260 216 is quite old yet can still play BF4 (when it doesn't crash) quite smoothly at 1080p, somewhere around the 35 -40 fps. I consider the game to still be un-optimized so who knows what future updates will bring.

I haven't needed to upgrade to a new GPU in practically 4 years. Even still I don't have to pay too much for a new mid-range card that will blow my current card out of the water. CPPU is an AMD Phenom II X6 1090T.

So yes, my system can keep up and it won't cost too much to get it to surpass the current gen consoles, especially if I go to craigslist or Microcenter.

RE: very simple
By Omega215D on 11/7/2013 4:56:03 PM , Rating: 2
I will upgrade when GTA V and Watch_Dogs hit though. Then that new card will last me quite long if developers keep playing it safe in terms of eye candy, unless we have another Crysis on our hands.

RE: very simple
By Omega215D on 11/7/2013 4:58:01 PM , Rating: 2
And who am I kidding. I'll most likely pick up the PS4 over the Xbox One. Always gotta have a console for those exclusive titles like Uncharted and The Last of Us.

RE: very simple
By jahwarrior on 11/7/2013 5:50:54 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, my 560ti can run it decently, but I would need to spend $250 to get at least a GTX 760 to surpass the ps4. another big reason I see to buy a console is game optimization, developers are putting out some seriously buggy games on PC these days.

RE: very simple
By Omega215D on 11/8/2013 12:21:08 PM , Rating: 2
No you don't. The GTX 560TI is more powerful than my card and it's still playing the new stuff without a hitch. So by the time you're ready for a new card you're most likely have to pay $130 - 170 for something comparable. If you spend in the $250 range then it'll outlast the consoles life for less money.

The programming thing I won't argue. Though with the new architectures from the two consoles it would mean easier porting of popular games that aren't console exclusives.

"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki