U.S. Air Force Looks to Develop Long-Range Strike Bomber on a Budget
November 7, 2013 8:22 AM
comment(s) - last by
A 2012 artist rendering of the LRS-B
(Source: Erik Simonsen)
Working with a decreased budget, the U.S. Air Force will push on with the Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) program
The United States military is tasked with developing new and ground breaking technologies, but budget issues are causing problems for numerous programs on the chopping block.
Don’t expect that to happen to the U.S. Air Force Long Range Strike-Bomber (LRS-B), an important step in modernizing the military’s combat aircraft program.
Much of the LRS-B program is classified, so exact details of the aircraft’s maximum range, design, and weapons payload haven’t been publicly disclosed. It is expected to have a similar range as the B-2 around 6,000 nautical miles, but anything else is currently speculation.
A flying prototype hasn’t been created, and just $600 million in funds has been used for research - $8.7 billion will be spent through 2018.
Even with additional budget scrutiny of the program, the LRS-B program continues to have support from military officials at the Pentagon.
Here is what Major Gen. Steve Kwast told the
Wall Street Journal,
“In the future, what our president is going to need is options, options to project power anywhere in the world within hours. This Long-Range Strike Bomber is going to be that option the president can use when there are no other options.”
There is increased collaboration between private government contractors, with Boeing and Lockheed Martin recently joined forces to secure the lucrative $100+ billion LRS-B contract. Since the U.S. military budget faces additional scrutiny, both Boeing and Lockheed Martin are expected to contribute “to bridge” until the federal government funding opens up again.
Boeing is taking the lead serving as the number one contractor, while Lockheed Martin is going to be in a support role. The two companies are tasked with producing 80-100 LRS-B aircraft for the Air Force, publicly launching in 2024-2026.
Luxuries such as a more comfortable crew lounge and expensive kitchenette have drawn criticism from some military officials. Previous long-range B-2 missions from the United States to Afghanistan, 40-hour runs, pilots didn’t have much beyond a cot to sleep on and a small cooler for food storage.
Beyond long-range strike capabilities, there is a global political posturing battle among several nations trying to develop new aircraft.
for a next-generation bomber while military experts believe China is developing a
new long-range stealth bomber
. There is unspoken anxiety in Washington if the US doesn’t work to develop its own next-generation military technologies as other countries ramp up research and development.
Furthermore, the aging B-1 and B-52 bombers are heading towards retirement, while the only 16 B-2 aircraft are combat ready – and cost $135,000 per hour for flight missions.
Critics of the program believe the Air Force would be better served in developing more sophisticated unmanned drones. Beyond the Middle East, UAVs
have been used in Africa
and a number of nations are developing drones for surveillance and national defense. Government contractor Northrop Grumman is already working on a long-endurance stealthy unmanned air system (UAS) and next-generation drones are being considered.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Can it be done??
11/8/2013 5:36:43 AM
The problem with the B-2 is that there are only 16 in the world and spare parts are scarce and expensive.
I am quite sure that in 2025 we will still have our ol' trusty work horse: the B-52.
There are still endless fields of mothballed B-52's in the Arizona desert for spare parts. Never change a winning airplane. ;-)
And I am quite sure that the new LRS-B will blow up any budget projections and introduction deadlines easily. Never change a winning production strategy (for the military industrial complex).
It is pretty sure it will be the most expensive plane ever. Maybe (again) only a handfull of planes built.
RE: Can it be done??
11/8/2013 1:58:11 PM
Why can't the military just write into a contract the same clause that used to kill us in the lab when working for the EPA, namely if you miss the deadline for delivery, they dock you a portion of the price each day until you deliver for free?
If Boeing doesn't deliver the new bomber up to two years late they just have to eat the cost. Nothing like the expectation of losing your company to motivate success.
"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference
Role of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Continues to Expand
October 30, 2013, 9:00 AM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Most Popular Articles
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information