Print 20 comment(s) - last by hughlle.. on Nov 19 at 2:12 PM

USS Zumwalt hits the water  (Source: AP)

The US Navy's USS Zumwalt  (Source: Bath Iron Works)
The U.S. Navy is one step closer to receiving the USS Zumwalt

The US Navy's massive 610-foot USS Zumwalt modern-day destroyer launched earlier this week, quietly hitting the water on the Kennebec River in Maine.

Zumwalt is a $4 billion warship featuring a next-generation advanced rocket system, with a 155mm “advanced gun system” capable of launching rocket-propelled warheads more than 100 miles. The ship will have the capability of firing 80 missiles, including cruise missiles and surface-to-air missiles.

“It’s absolutely massive. It’s higher than the tree line on the other side,” said Amy Lent, Maine Maritime Museum Executive Director, in a press statement. “It’s an absolutely huge ship – very imposing. It’s massively dominating the waterfront.”

If needed for rescue or surveillance, Zumwalt can support two Seahawk helicopters – or four unmanned aerial vehicles – with the US Navy showing increased interest in using UAVs.

To operate, a crew of only 130 to 150 is needed, and they will get to enjoy a larger living space, satellite laptops to connect to the Internet, and better food from a modern kitchen.

The USS Zumwalt was originally scheduled to be christened on October 19, but was canceled due to the US federal government shutdown.  Bath Iron Works and the US Navy plan to officially christen the Zumwalt – and the US Navy is scheduled to officially receive the ship in 2015.

The ship designers and electricians admitted there was an initial learning curve they had to overcome to deal with the warship’s angular carbon fiber composite superstructure and custom hull.  The superstructure hides antennas and satellites and deflects radar, while the custom hull cuts through waves faster.

Despite the expected benefits of the Zumwalt, the destroyer does have some critics regarding the scope of its goals.  Some critics say the Navy is trying to implement too many different emerging technologies that haven’t been tested in real-world situations yet.  

Cost is another problem that is often mentioned regarding the DDG-1000 class of destroyers, which is proving expensive.  The Navy originally wanted to spend $9 billion for research and development for the DDG-1000 program - and $20 billion to build and launch seven next-generation ships.  As many as three ships could be cut from the program, so only four DDG-1000 battleships could be developed in the future.

Sources: CNN, US Navy Times, UPI

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By CubicleDilbert on 11/3/2013 11:54:53 AM , Rating: 0
And again another US toy in search for a good war.

I only hope it will share the fate of the Yamamoto. Way to precious and expensive to use in combat, better hide it in a safe haven. And when time comes it fails epically!

And against whom should this ship be used? There are only 2 countries in the world left, that don't obey US orders and are militarily helpless. Yemen and North Korea. Is it worth it to send this ship there?

I thought carbon fiber shatters like crazy when severely hit (think carbon fiber bike) by a missile. And is carbon fiber not resin and pure carbon? Should burn like crazy.

That's all what America desires today.
Economy in ruins. 50 millions on food stamps. Bankrupt cities everywhere. Poverty and misery. But the military industrial complex has endless funds.

Something is going wrong.

By CubicleDilbert on 11/3/2013 11:56:00 AM , Rating: 2
Was it Yamato or Yamamoto?
I don't remember the correct name of the Japanese super ship.

RE: New Toy needs wars to keep itseld entertained
By Bubbacub on 11/4/2013 10:04:03 AM , Rating: 2
Yamato = ship
Yamamamoto = admiral

By Bubbacub on 11/4/2013 10:05:22 AM , Rating: 2
Misspelt Yamamoto in last post

RE: New Toy needs wars to keep itseld entertained
By hartleyb on 11/4/2013 1:24:10 PM , Rating: 2
Obviously your a liberal, but despite all our faults as a country, the U.S. military presense has kept our country free. A strong offense is always a good defense. In 1987 there was a coup in the Philipines, when the battleships showed up off the coast to protect U.S. interest, the coup ended without a shot being fired. Because you have a big military doesn't mean you actually seek war. The bay of pigs is another case of not firing a shot. The U.S. has liberated and defended many counties through it's history, but people tend to loose sight of that fact. And it's the blood of U.S. soldiers that gives us our freedoms. If you live in the U.S. then you should really learn about it's history before making lame coments like you have in your post.

By seraphim1982 on 11/6/2013 12:23:33 PM , Rating: 2
I love your selective memory... only quoting which helps your argument. How about the rest military events that prove otherwise.

By MrBungle123 on 11/8/2013 12:44:38 PM , Rating: 2
People generally will mention things that support a point they are trying to make when arguing. What you're suggesting makes no sense.

By hughlle on 11/19/2013 2:12:25 PM , Rating: 2
Not at all. What he is saying is that if there are say two examples, both resulting in opposing conclusions, then it is stupid to then try and create an argument by picking the example that suits your position, and not mentioning the other example.

The point is that it is stupid to try and base your argument on facts when you know full well there are plenty of examples that state otherwise. Is the person debating stupid enough to think that noone will know of the opposing examples, or to look into it? Like the government saying there is no medical properties to cannabis. It's a stupid argument because there are plenty of examples of it having plenty of medical properties.

By Michael Hatamoto on 11/6/2013 3:03:12 PM , Rating: 2
A bigger concern than the carbon fiber is the realization that a sizable wave could damage the ship. The downward-sloping hull makes it stealthy, but a large swell that hits the Zumwell's back-end could make it unstable and have major ramifications.

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki