New "Anti-Troll" Patent Reform Bill Draws Praise
October 24, 2013 9:05 PM
comment(s) - last by
Bill is seen as a win for businesses and consumers alike, if a bit weak on a couple topics
Today in the U.S. a strong case could be made that intellectual property is doing more harm than good to consumers and innovative companies. That's
not an argument
against intellectual property, rather it's a testament to just
to the poor state of the American intellectual property system
I. Fixing a Broken System
Veteran legal experts
that the patent and copyright systems
Much of the human genome is "patented"
by biotech firms
preventing cancer research
and other medical progress (and a recent Supreme Court ruling
protects key elements of those patents
). Big electronics companies like Apple, Inc. (
patenting things like "rectangular body with curved edges"
and suing their rivals.
Meanwhile, all these big players are
also under attack
from the bottom
by "patent troll"
companies that produce nothing, buy up collections of intellectual property, and sue those who do produce
via shell companies
. Some trolls are even suing small businesses for merely using Wi-Fi or
developing apps with notifications
It would seem an easy thing to agree upon among federal lawmakers to move aggressively to reform the broken system. While some corporate interests oppose remedies to some of the aforementioned problems (e.g. gene patents or patents on simple design elements), most companies stand united against
so-called patent assertion entities (PAE) or non-practicing entities (NPE)
-- companies that produce nothing, but instead buy up patents to sue productive U.S. businesses.
NPEs/PAEs are allegedly the worst of the trolls. [Image Source: Word of the Nerd]
record contributions from traditional tech businesses
minimal contributions from PAEs/NPEs
(aka "the trolls"), this would seem like something Congress would be eager to take up -- particularly as it's an example of the occasional case where consumer interests and corporate interests seem to align for a common good.
Patents are often abused under the current system. [Image Source: ICanHazCheeseburger]
But progress has been slow. In June
U.S. Federal Trade Commission
to use its ambiguously defined powers to examine the behavior of PAEs/NPEs, who stand accused of the most severe forms of patent trolling. The FTC agreed to probe the problem, but made it clear to Congress that it
wasn't in the business of suing the PAEs/NPEs
, even if it found they were trolling.
II. New Bill Emerges
Thankfully that deadlock has changed. Back from the government shutdown, members of the U.S. House of Representatives showed a rare moment of cooperation, convening to address the problem of patent trolling.
A new bill looks to take a bite out of patent trolls' business scheme. [Image Source: Sodahead]
A new bill dubbed the "
Innovation Act of 2013
" has been proposed, sponsored by a bipartisan collective in the Republican-controlled house. Sponsors include:
Rep. Bob Goodlatte
Rep. Zoe Lofgren
Rep. Spencer Bachus
Rep. Jason Chaffetz
Rep. Howard Coble
Rep. Peter Defazio
Rep. Anna Eshoo
Rep. Blake Farenthold
Rep. Lamar Smith
Rep. Tom Marino
* Primary sponsor
Rep. Lamar Smith has joined with past rivals to sponsor the bill. [Image Source: Lamar Smith]
For those who don't follow politics, let's just say the collection of sponsors is littered with odd bedfellows. For example Reps. Chaffetz and Eshoo were among the coalition that
a pair of questionable antipiracy bills
-- U.S. House of Representative's
"Stop Online Piracy Act"
) and its Senate equivalent, the "PROTECT IP Act" (PIPA) (
). On the flip side you have Rep. Smith whose office was
. In other words the sponsors are an odd hodgepodge of supporters of big government supporters and budget-trimming proponents; tradditionalists and reformists; "Tea Party" Congresspeople (e.g. Rep. Chaffetz and Farenthold) and relatively "liberal" Congressmen/women like Rep. Eshoo [
Congress is at last putting serious effort into tackling the issue of patent trolling.
[Image Source: U.S. Congress]
Given that odd assortment, it's clear just how broad support for the bill is across a host of political idealogies. And that makes it all the more puzzling why it took so long to get here (oh well).
II. What Advocacies are Saying
The bill would amend USC (U.S. Code [of Law])
-- the section of the U.S. legal code that governs patent law, and amend the "America Invents Act", which Obama
signed into law in 2011
The bill reverses some key provisions of the controversial 2011 America Invents Act, which some claim enables trolling. [Image Source: Unknown]
Skepticism of the new bill is high -- particularly given that the American Invents Act was billed as the "most comprehensive change to our Nation’s patent laws in 60 years", but evolved into a law that many patent reform advocates said made key problems worse.
But in its current form the new Innovation Act is draw strong positive feedback from social libertarians and civil rights advocacies on the "left" and "right" alike. For example the
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Today, we are one giant step closer to real patent reform in the United States. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), along with a broad bipartisan coalition, has introduced the
Innovation Act of 2013
, comprehensive legislation that, if passed, would severely limit trolls' ability to continue their trolly behavior....
But at the time, we were still quite concerned. First and foremost,
we worried that the law didn't address the growing patent troll issue
... Second, we worried that Congress, having passed patent legislation, would not be interested in taking up the issue again. Fortunately, Congress surprised us.
What changed? Well, the tech community learned how to better make its voice heard in D.C. (Remember
?) This American Life focused two full hours (
) on patent trolls. And brave members of Congress, like Rep. Peter Defazio, got in front of the issue by introducing bills like the
But, really, the trolls have done
all the hard work for us
. They targeted
for using generally available technology. They sued
small city governments for using bus tracking software
. They went after businesses for using
and the kind of WiFi routers you would buy off the shelf at Best Buy.
Thank you, trolls. You didn't only get our attention, you got the attention of Rep. Goodlatte, along with other
, and even the
. We're going to be working hard to make sure that not only is your 15 minutes of fame over, but so too is your entire business model.
That's a pretty strong statement of support, from a top advocacy who is funded by the likes of Google and has been steadfastly fighting patent trolling, particularly in its most severe forms (i.e. NPEs/PAEs).
III. How Does it Work?
The bill is indeed appears as good as the EFF says -- assuming it isn't neutered before it comes to a vote. Among its key provisions are:
Forcing parent companies to declare their interest in lawsuits and exposing them to having to pay court fees, eliminating the benefits of shell companies, a key trolling tactic.
The proposed law would restrict the use of unaccountable shell companies, a favorite tactic of trolls. [Image Source: Blogspot]
Patent lawsuit filers must explain who will benefit from the legal win. If it's a little office in the middle of nowhere occupied by 13 other shell companies, the case can be conveniently tossed out.
Loser Pays Up
Loser in a patent lawsuit would now have to pay court fees. This would be a crippling blow to NPEs/PAEs who often hedge their efforts on the assumption that it's cheaper to settle than fight accusations in court. At the same time it could also impact patent wars between large companies like Apple and Google Inc. (
) by forcing them to think twice before suing.
Patent case losers may now be required to pay more of the winner's court fees. [Image Source: Bay Area Bankruptcy]
This provision is weaker, though, than in the SHIELD Act -- another reform bill -- as it does not include the bond requirement, a key payment in the case.
Lawsuit filers must now precisely explain how they believe their patent is being validated and which claims in the patent they think are violated.
This again could impact both NPEs/PAEs and litigation-happy corporate entities like Apple who would now have to more precisely explain how they believe the accused product(s) (e.g. a rectangular smartphone) infringe, making a jury less reliant on
arbitrary interpretations of infringement claims
Post-grant, patents will now be eligible to an expensive, but more sure-fire review track.
Companies like Google can pay examiners to look at prior art and determine whether rivals like Apple
improperly obtained certain patents
(and vice versa).
Patents will now be eligible for faster reviews. [Image Source: InvestorsEye]
Protects business secrets
Prevents trolls and/or companies from using court filings to try to threaten to disclose their legal victims sensitive business data, a tactic that's sometimes used to try to force a legal opponent to settle.
Freezes suits against customers:
Weaker than the SHIELD Act, which would in most cases prevent suing customers for infringement by a third party.
Does make it so customers and third party can't be sued at the same time -- as NPEs/PAEs are fond of doing.
As you can see, the bill's strongest provisions deal with PAEs/NPEs -- the most blatant of trolls. In that regard it may be viewed as a good first step. Once that issue has been resolved, Congress can (theoretically) move on to tougher problems like figuring out ways to stop companies from filing over ambiguous/speculative patents,
repatenting existing art
forcing fair licensing rates for patents
based on industry expert analysis.
Of course, Congress seems unlikely to tackle such complex problems, given that they
lack traction with special interest dollars
. But at least there's hope this modest reform can pass through, given the current shows of support.
Innovation Act of 2013 [PDF]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Big company wins
10/25/2013 1:55:27 PM
the current bill seems to favor big companies, to shield them from small trolls
small companies still aren't protected
RE: Big company wins
10/26/2013 3:55:31 AM
No surprise there. Small companies aren't making large campaign contributions.
"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA
Tech Kings: Facebook, Google, Verizon, AT&T, et al. Set Lobbying Record
October 24, 2013, 8:42 AM
Report: Patent Trolls "Play the Silly Game", Buy DC Lobbyists to Influence Congress
October 7, 2013, 4:54 PM
FTC Will Probe "Patent Troll" Problem, But Won't Sue Anyone
June 20, 2013, 10:03 AM
Supreme Court Gives Mixed Verdict on Patenting Human Genes
June 13, 2013, 2:00 PM
House Punts on Patent Trolls, Asks FTC to Deal With the Problem
June 7, 2013, 6:54 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information