backtop


Print 27 comment(s) - last by fteoath64.. on Oct 25 at 6:07 AM


Actor Kunal Nayyar wearing Google Glass
No details on Microsoft's product are available

When Google unveiled its Google Glass wearable electronic device, it caught the imagination of many people with its futuristic looks and premise. Following the initial buzz created by Google Glass, word has now surfaced that Microsoft is currently testing prototypes of its own internet-connected eyewear.

The tip comes from people who “claim to be familiar” with the plans at Microsoft according to the Wall Street Journal. “Technology companies can’t afford to wait,” Canalys analyst Daniel Matte said. “But device vendors will face a number of tough challenges including strict power constraints which limit the number of sensors.”
 
The market for wearable smart electronics is expected to grow to $10 billion by 2016. Microsoft missed out on the big smartphone market shift that occurred when the original iPhone launched in 2007. It also missed the boat after Apple found success in the tablet market with the iPad and saw its first generation, first-party tablet hardware flop. Microsoft doesn’t want to get caught flat-footed again in the wearables market.

Internet connected eyewear is expected to remain a niche category for at least the next 3 to 5 years, but products like Google Glass are expected to do well in specialized markets such as security and healthcare.

One key factor for wearable electronics such as Google Glass and competing products is the price. Google Glass is expected to sell for around $1,500. Those prices obviously need to come down significantly moving forward to attract a large consumer market. Consumers will also have to get past the “creep factor” of connected eyewear.

Source: WSJ



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: me-too imitator
By Argon18 on 10/22/2013 2:57:48 PM , Rating: -1
Are you really this confused and clueless? I mean, seriously??

Netscape came before IE on every OS, including Windows. By a several-years lead I might add. And they sold it for a profit, while IE was a freebie giveaway designed specifically to put Netscape out of business.

What does Atari or Nintendo have to do with this? Xbox was a Playstation competitor. Do your homework bro!

iPod was released in 2001, Zune didn't come until 2006. YOU are wrong.

Windows Mobile phones were not consumer phones. Apple iPhone was the first commercial successful consumer smart phone. Get a clue man!

Old Windows tablets were just a laptop with a touchscreen. They were horrible and nobody bought them. iPad was the first commercial success.

Dude, you are really stupid, do some homework before you reply!!


RE: me-too imitator
By ven1ger on 10/22/2013 3:26:39 PM , Rating: 5
Playstation was a competitor to Nintendo.

Just because Retro failed to see your comparison is biased because of your hate of MS that your logic fails to see that there were other products that paved the way. Even before the iPod was released there were mp3 players available but iPod became the success story.

Your hating on MS is bordering on psychotic, dude. Every company builds upon what the competition is offering, MS is no different in that regard. MS tactics in blocking competition is really appalling but so is Apple's tactics in stifling competition but yet you seem to be a fan of Apple but you detest MS. MS copies the competition and hate MS for that, but while Apple copies the competition, you love Apple for that. Kind of ironic if it wasn't pitiful.


RE: me-too imitator
By ritualm on 10/23/2013 11:19:12 AM , Rating: 2
Seriously? Argon18, you're proving to be an even bigger idiot than the other guy you're claiming as "really stupid".

Netscape first came out on Windows, eventually appearing on every other OS at the time. Fail #1.

PlayStation did came before XBox. Except, the only problem with your argument is Sony didn't originally create the PSX to compete against Microsoft - it was designed to go after Nintendo. Remember: Sony went to Nintendo to collaborate on a new console, only to get rebuffed, so it went into the business themselves. Fail #2.

iPod was released in 2001. Except, Diamond Multimedia released the Rio (MP3 player with 32MB onboard storage, remember that yet?) years earlier. Also, Creative had the Nomad line, including the HDD-based Jukebox, before the iPod came out. iRiver's CD-based MP3 players, Samsung Yepp, etc., all of them came out before the iPod did. Fail #3.

Windows Mobile phones were consumer phones. Actually, back then they're phone-enabled PDAs, and their primary competitors included the Palm Treo. iPhone? Not until 2007. Microsoft's been in the phone business before that! Fail #4.

Windows tablets pre-iPad were tablets, running a touch-/pen-enabled version of Windows XP (in other words, a full blown operating system, as opposed to the bastardized crap that was iOS). They're not widely used in the consumer space... so what? Apple's version was the Newton, released a full decade before XP came out, and it flunked at all levels. Fail #5.
quote:
Dude, you are really stupid, do some homework before you reply!!

I have to cope with bouts of short-term memory loss, and even I can remember old stuff better than you. Clearly, you were not actively heeding your own advice.


"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki