Print 57 comment(s) - last by chripuck.. on Oct 25 at 1:14 PM

He'll do so at an event today at 11:25 a.m.

U.S. President Barack Obama has called the issues with the website "unacceptable" at an event this morning.

According to Reuters, Obama announced a plan to address the recent problems with at an event today in the White House Rose Garden. Consumers, pharmacists and business owners were in attendance. 

With the rollout of Obamacare on October 1, a key part of the program is consumer accessibility to in order to select new insurance plans. The idea behind it is to bring health insurance to Americans that have gone without, and it also doesn't prevent those with pre-existing conditions to apply. 

But the White House didn't expect to see the amount of traffic it did when Obamacare began. Within the first 10 days, there were over 19 million visits to the site. This led to many technical problems with the site, such as jumbled text, error messages and delays with loading pages. 

Obama even compared the glitchy website to iOS 7.

Obama sees this as a serious issue and addressed it today, calling it unacceptable" and planning new ways for Americans to get insurance exchanges despite site issues. 

"The president will directly address the technical problems with - troubles that he and his team find unacceptable - and discuss the actions he has pushed for to make it easier for consumers to comparison shop and enroll for insurance while work continues around the clock to improve the website," said a White House official.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), fixes are being made to the site, but it's not all bad. It said people have been successful in other tasks on, such as verifying eligibility. 

"Individuals have been able to verify their eligibility for credits, enabling them to shop for, and enroll in, low- or even no-cost health plans," said HHS. "We have updated the site several times with new code that includes bug fixes. Our team has called in additional help to solve some of the more complex technical issues we are encountering."

As of last Saturday night, it was reported that almost half a million Americans applied for health insurance as part of Obamacare. 

Source: Reuters

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Bogus
By Rukkian on 10/21/2013 2:27:09 PM , Rating: 4
While I don't think the bill is neccessarily the answer, I think it is better than "lets stick our heads in the sand and maybe it will fix itself" that the Reps have been trying to accomplish. No healthcare proposals at all, just stick with what is not working.

There are many very good things in this bill, including no lifetime maximums, no worry about pre existing, amoung others. To be able to accomplish these, it does require that everybody has insurance one way or another to accomplish those things.

Having everybody have insurance should help people to actually get preventive care, avoiding trips to the ER or hospital stay in some cases. This is a positive side effect.

I really wish the right would stop with the "Repeal ACA" and come out and offer their suggestions to the problems with health care. Right now what they are doing is even worse than what the left is doing (which is bad to begin with). Neither side is doing much at this point.

RE: Bogus
By Ammohunt on 10/21/2013 2:31:32 PM , Rating: 5
The real solution to the perceived healthcare problems in the US is to execute all trial lawyers.

RE: Bogus
By EricMartello on 10/24/2013 3:38:16 PM , Rating: 2
Or we could reform tort laws to limit what lawsuits can be filed and for what; thus eliminating the ambulance chasers.

The ACA has nothing to do with healthcare, btw. It's all about health insurance...access to health insurance =/= access to health care.

At any time prior to the ACA rollout, you or anyone else could have signed up for private health insurance directly through a carrier. The pre-existing condition issue was the big "selling point" of the ACA...well, they could have just passed a law that prohibits insurance companies from turning people down due to pre-existing conditions, allowing the insurance companies to bill them higher premiums/deductibles due to their obviously higher risk.

RE: Bogus
By ianweck on 10/21/2013 2:42:30 PM , Rating: 3
I don't know why people insist Republicans have never put forth an alternative. Yes it requires a repeal of Obamacare, but that is a good thing. It keeps several positive points of Obamacare.

RE: Bogus
By Rukkian on 10/21/2013 3:43:50 PM , Rating: 2
If you read the link you sent, it shows that a bill has never even been out for a vote, and is not actually finalized. This is not a solution if it has not even been written yet.

Without a mandate, I am not sure how you can force insurance companies to cover pre-exisitng. It also says nothing about lifetime max payouts. For pre-existing, it simply says that it is limited to 200% of the standard rate, but that just means they will raise the regular rate to compensate. You will still see many people without insurance since it is too expensive, and just end up going to the emergency room. Then if they get a long term (or terminal disease), or pregnancy they will go on insurance at that point, and only have to pay double what others pay.

This is not sustainable imo.

RE: Bogus
By Reclaimer77 on 10/21/2013 2:42:51 PM , Rating: 2
The premise that the republicans need an alternative big-Government plan kind of defeats the point, doesn't it?

Big-Goverent getting involved in healthcare to "fix' things is why we have the mess we have.

And let's be real, Republicans HAVE made many great proposals! The Democrats and the President treat any proposal that isn't designed to grow the deficit and expand Government as a non:starter.

RE: Bogus
By tayb on 10/21/13, Rating: -1
RE: Bogus
By Reclaimer77 on 10/21/13, Rating: 0
RE: Bogus
By KCjoker on 10/21/2013 6:31:48 PM , Rating: 2
It's not BS, just look how Gov't runs things it's a fact they are insanely inefficient. And the Repubs have given specific ideas just the Libs don't like them. First we need TORT reform, second we need competition across state lines. Last but not least we need ALL hospitals to have concrete info on what they charge for their services. Why should I blindly visit hospital A for a hip replacement for 10K if hospital B does the same for 5K for example. Now YOU can shut up instead of being a champion for big Gov't which is destroying this country.

RE: Bogus
By Reclaimer77 on 10/21/2013 6:39:00 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. Big Government BS??

Let's take a look at Social Security and Medicare, shall we? Some of the worst programs, offering the lowest quality care, and they are like 40 TRILLION in debt!

And these are the people we want running the health insurance of every citizen in the country???

RE: Bogus
By Reclaimer77 on 10/21/2013 6:35:05 PM , Rating: 4
No healthcare proposals at all, just stick with what is not working.

Also, and this isn't just directed at you, I'm sick of debating along this false premise.

For the vast sweeping majority of Americans, there simply was no imminent healthcare issue. Certainly not a crisis that needed immediate action from Washington.

Not working? I'm far from "rich", and I couldn't be happier with my current health plan coverage!!

Now you're telling me that because of some faceless "uninsured" people I shouldn't be beholden to, I have to pay higher premiums, have less choice, AND lose my current personal physician and enter an "exchange".

In the immortal words of Jesse Pinkman, "well Heil Hitler bit*h!"

And my god, have you seen the deductibles of some of these plans!? Even the "Bronze" plan, the "most affordable", has INSANE deductibles.

This whole goddamn thing is a clusterf*ck, it's a mess. It's the biggest boondoggle ever! It's worst than it was!!! Doing nothing would ABSOLUTELY be better than Obamacare.

There is NOTHING more important to the future of this country than repealing the ACA. Repeat, NOTHING else matters! If we don't stop this now, the country is over!!! The Federal Government will have unlimited mandate power over it's citizens. Do you people not understand this!??

RE: Bogus
By R3T4rd on 10/22/2013 6:31:34 AM , Rating: 2
Welcome to the Social Democracy of the United States of America!

Sad our kids are taught by mostly socialistic leftist school teachers and professors so they are ingrained with socialistic ideas.

Sad for the change everyone voted for.

Sad my Healthcare jumped 3X the amount and now I am limited to what I can choose - yes thats from my private sector employer who is a Fortune 500 company.

Sad this once great country now is just figment of itself.

Happy I lived and grew up in the 80's.

Seriously, we should split the US in half right down the Mississippi River. I wonder how long the Socialistic Liberal side of the US will last before they squander to the door steps of the Capitalistic Conservative US asking for help? Greece......

RE: Bogus
By Ammohunt on 10/22/2013 2:02:40 PM , Rating: 2
Seriously, we should split the US in half right down the Mississippi River.

I agree split it somewhere; I will not live nor have my children live in the version of America the academic leftists of this country aim to create. I will fight it by whatever means necessary. Its time for those that want to retain a constitutional republic separate themselves from those who want Neo-European Socialist America.

Mr president just because you won an elections doesn't mean you have a mandate from the people to do whatever the hell you like.

RE: Bogus
By chripuck on 10/25/2013 1:14:06 PM , Rating: 2
I'm a red voter through and through, but the prices I saw quoted on were sensible. They were inline with what I pay now through my small business employer and had similar deductibles. Interestingly enough if I wanted to go the disasterous coverage route I could say $500 a month.

Now granted I didn't actually go through the website application process, they simply asked me for my zip code, but apparently I'm "poor" enough that I should qualify for some sort of discount (apparently if you make less than 95,000/year with 2 children and a spouse you're poor now.)

Being a software consultant myself I find the 600 million price tag insulting, even if it was a perfectly functioning, state of the art website. The fact that it works poorly just adds insult to injury. I mean for heavens sake, Facebook was written by three kids in a dormroom over the span of 6 months. We seriously can't find a team of professional web developers to build this thing in a year when we have 600 million dollars available?

"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki