Russia, U.S. Eye Team-up to Build Massive Nuke to Save Planet from an Asteroid
October 17, 2013 3:52 PM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: Touchstone Pictures)
The mother of all bombs would sit in wait in an orbitary platform
Professor H. Jay Melosh
has spent his career studying massive impact craters such as Chicxulub, a massive, partially underwater impact region in the Yucatan.
Thanks to Professor Melosh's research, scientists now feel reasonably confident that it was this massive asteroid impact that
triggered the extinction event that killed the dinosaurs
. And for the last two decades, Professor Melosh had been chief evangelist for a campaign urging the U.S. and other spacefaring nations to adopt a plan to
design asteroid diverting devices
to make sure the same thing doesn't happen to mankind.
I. To Nuke?
Opinion on how exactly to end
an extinction-event size asteroid
is sharply divided in the research communities of Russia and the U.S. --
the world's veteran
One camp was formerly led by
, a veteran U.S. researcher referred to as the "father of the [American] hydrogen (fusion) bomb". Before his passing he urged lawmakers in the 1990s to consider the use of a massive nuclear warhead, the mother of all bombs, to literally
blow an asteroid off its orbit-crossing impact course
with Earth. At a 1995 meeting at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL) in Calif., he pitched the idea to a collective of U.S. and Russian
ex-Cold War weapons designers
and space engineers.
[Image Source: YouTube]
On the other side is a coalition of experts who believe a non-nuclear solution is possible, and that those on the other side are willfully overlooking the potential security risks of a space nuke for their own self-interest.
Nukes and asteroids... where have we seen this before??? Oh, right...
[Image Source: Touchstone Pictures]
George Mason University
Professor Hugh Gusterson
is cynical about the effort, remarking, "It was a response to the loss of the weapons lab mission, it was not a response to the asteroid threat."
In his 1998 book about the effects of the Cold War on nuclear weapons testers at LLNL "
Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War
" he argues that interest peaked when nuclear researchers feared that if they did not convinced the government to switch gears and develop nukes to target asteroids, they might lose their jobs. But after they obtained jobs maintaining the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile, he says, these clamoring calls largely died down, save for a few holdouts like Ed Teller.
II. Not to Nuke?
Professor Melosh is also a skeptic of those who advocate
a nuclear answer
. He is leading a campaign to
use an alternate, non-nuclear solution
. In a recent interview with
The Center For Public Integrity
he recalls the 1995 meeting at LLNL,
, "It was a really bizarre thing to see that these weapons designers were willing to work together—to build the biggest bombs ever."
He points out that no very large asteroids are in near-term orbits that overlap with the Earth. He adds, "The remaining smaller objects can be dealt with by non-nuclear means, kinetic detection being the most straightforward [feasible]. I think that the need for deflecting very large objects that might require nuclear detonations is waning and that a reevaluation of realistic needs is very much in order."
Purdue University Geophysics Professor H. Jay Melosh [Image Source: Purdue University]
His plan is to shoot large mechanical impactors -- battering rams of sorts -- at the meteorite, which could
come with ion boosters
to further "push" the asteroid post-impact with the object. Together, he argues, this mechanical solution could prove far more safe and effective than his nuclear alternative. The disadvantage is that mechanical solutions would admittedly take more time.
Researchers believe mankind must find a way to prevent an extinction level asteroid from htting the Earth. [Image Source: LANL]
Professor Christopher Chyba
-- a nuclear weapons expert and a member of President Obama’s 18-person
Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
-- sit somewhere in the middle. He argues that the U.S. and its allies need to increase spending for asteroid surveys to predict potential threats, which could be averted with mechanical solutions such as Professor Melosh's. On the other hand, since surveys
could miss a dangerous asteroid
, he supports a nuclear solution too.
He comments, "This is a hazard I take seriously, and I think this civilization needs to take it seriously. I have no qualms with research on deflection strategies, including nuclear deflection strategies. Nothing will be done to jeopardize existing arms control treaties. There, the game’s not worth the candle. Nobody’s talking about testing."
III. Obama, Russia Leaning Towards Mega Space Nuke
The deck seems stacked against the nuclear camp. Today there are several major international treaties that ban nuclear weapons testing including the
1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty
(LTBT) which forbids nuclear weapons tests underground and the
1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty
(CTBT) which prohibits all tests. The former treaty was signed by the U.S. and ratified by Congress, while the latter test was signed by President Bill Clinton, but not yet ratified by Congress.
And then there's the
1967 Outer Space Treaty
-- a treaty that prohibits the use of or testing of weapons in space. That treaty has been signed by 129 nations in total -- including China, Russia, and the U.S. Every spacefaring nation, in fact, has signed it
except for Iran
But despite its possibility to breach international treaties, the Obama administration has come to support the nuclear idea. Last month the
U.S. Secretary of Energy
Ernest Moniz and
Russian nuclear agency
(Rosatom) Director Sergey Kirienko
signed a shadowy agreement
to collaborate on "defense from asteroids" and other topics. The 47-page document, published in both English and Russian was not made public, but the
Center of Public Integrity
managed to obtain a copy and make it
Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz (left) and Russian atomic agency (Rosatom) Director Sergey Kirienko claims their collaboration will be for peace. [Image Source: State Dept.]
Strangely, there's no mention of asteroids at all in the "agreement" (a semantics game used by recent Presidents to circumvent the authority of Congress, whom are required to sign all "treaties"). Instead the actual text only describes peacetime efforts to improve nuclear fission power, study the potential for nuclear
, safeguard nuclear stocks against terrorists, and come up with more effective means of
disposing of nuclear waste
But some experts believe the agreement may be an opening overture in an agreement between the world's two largest nuclear nations to breach both space weapons and nuclear testing treaties, testing warheads in space.
In February the Russia's deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin received a proposal from the Russia’s Academy of Sciences to spend $2B USD on asteroid defense. The academy told Russian state-support television channel RT, "Destruction of an asteroid in emergency cases may be performed by a rocket with a powerful megaton-class nuclear warhead. If the threat is detected early, more advanced means of changing an asteroid’s orbit may be considered."
David Dearborn, a LLNL researcher, is America's senior anti-asteroid researcher and key advocate of a nuclear solution. [Image Source CFPI]
Rosatom's deputy director Oleg Shubin -- an attendee at the 1995 LLNL meeting -- is his country's counterpart to Ed Teller. He has authored several papers exploring the idea. A March article by state-owned news agency RIA Novosti said that Mr. Shubin was campaigning among Russia's leadership to develop space nukes. The article states, "In the opinion of Oleg Shubin, a departmental director at Rosatom, nonnuclear ways of deflecting and destroying Earth-bound asteroids may be exotic but ineffective."
IV. U.S. is Backing Nuclear Option With Research Funding
In the U.S. funding for examining
nuclear deterrents to an asteroid
is gaining ground. Government-funded research scientists at
Los Alamos National Laboratory
(LANL) in New Mexico have been studying the effect of a nuclear warhead on an asteroid using simulations.
and research physicist Cathy Plesko are among the small collective of government researchers at the lab working at least part time to study the idea using the
LANL's Cielo supercomputer
. The researchers are trying to determine -- whether "an energy source of this magnitude" could "really disrupt this asteroid and prevent the hazard to the entire Earth," in Mr. Weaver's words.
Catherine Plesko, LANL researcher [Image Source: Santa Fe Radio Cafe]
University of Washington (UW) engineering professor has received a $1.25M USD grant from the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to study a ballistic impactor designed to deliver a nuclear warhead into an asteroid.
A 1997 concept for a nuclear interceptor to be used on an incoming asteroid
He says in an interview, "When we first started looking at this about a dozen years ago, very early on, the nuclear option was the one that everyone said, ‘Hey, we can do this.' But that was politically incorrect, so there was a lot of hesitation for anyone to say that this is a solution."
Iowa State University
(ISU) is another key player in the nuclear effort, with
Professor Bong Wie
Asteroid Deflection Research Center
, a center looking to model and build model impactors. Professor Wie and the center received a $600,000 USD grant to investigate a "hypervelocity nuclear interceptor system", which would rocket towards an asteroid, fire a secondary impactor, which would create a crater, which would serve as landing site for the warhead in the main missile, preventing the missile from "bouncing" off the asteroid and corralling the blast.
A rendering of the anti-asteroid missile by ISU Professor Bong Wie's group.
Professor Wie estimates a two-stage launcher based on his design would cost $500M USD and could be launched in coming years to demonstrate the technology he's currently developing.
The senior U.S. research studying the nuclear solution is nuclear weapons designer
David S. P. Dearborn
, who was working on the problem on his own time until 2012, when he obtained a grant to make it his full time project at LLNL. You fragment it with enough force so that the pieces spread out ... [and most] miss the Earth. Small bits of rock would burn up in the atmosphere, or fall as dust. Fragmentation may reduce a catastrophe to an inconvenience.
V. Feasibility Concerns Remain
A nuclear explosion would look much different in space than Earth, taking a spherical shape, rather than the mushroom cloud we know. It's unclear whether a nuclear blast could destroy a large asteroid, and if so
what size blast would be necessary
Russian researchers in February mentioned a 1-megaton device, but by March Oleg Shubin said he believed a multi-megaton device might be necessary. (Russia's "Tzar Bombs" built in the 1960s packed 50-100 megatons of explosive energy.) The effect on the asteroid could depend somewhat on its composition as the electro magnetic pulse (EMP) could result in complex magnetization and heating if the asteroid was rich in certain metallic elements, such as iron.
Even if research can hash out what size device they need, there's the question of how to deliver it. Mr. Dearborn and Professor Wie want to deliver it directly. But Ed Teller prefered
an orbital platform with the nuke onboard
-- and some nuclear advocates think that's a good solution. Such a platform could make for a slightly faster response (due to less launch prep) and more precise targeting (due to the effects of atmospheric exit versus space launch) -- but critics like Mr. Dearborn complain that such a platform could pose a security risk, could be
damaged by space debris
, and would require regular maintenance by astronauts.
A similar "orbiting platform" non-nuclear solution has been proposed by
University of California
Professor Phillip Lubin
who wants to build a six-mile (10 km) wide targeting mirror (dubbed "DE-STAR"), combined with a network of laser satellites, which together could focus over a megaton of force a day to a target object.
Prof. Phillip Lubin's "DE-STAR" laser system [UCSB]
A final feasibility problem is what to do with the remains. A shot at a far away object could safely remedy a threat, but a shot near enough to Earth could create a small flock of asteroids that could prove only slightly less dangerous. It's possible such smaller targets could be dealt with by land-based missile defenses, but it's a topic researchers are taking seriously.
At the end of the day of these technologies remain proven, so mankind is as vulnerable as ever to an asteroid strike. But some are working to change that, even if they remain bitterly divided on the topic of nukes in space.
The Center for Public Integrity 
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
10/18/2013 12:32:13 AM
Did anyone forget the moon? A asteroid that would impact that, would be just as bad as hitting the earth, or worse. Not only do we have to protect earth, but that too. Could you imagine if something disturbed it's orbit, or heavens forbid, destroyed it? The moon gives balance to the earth, and helps it's rotation to stabilize. Without the moon, the rotation of the earth would be too uncontrollable for human life.
10/18/2013 8:41:38 AM
I like your name, and I'm certainly happy for you now that you've finally had more than one thought in your life. I'm afraid I'd have to burst your bubble though, and point out it was not thought out all that well. An asteroid can not impact the moon's orbit in any measurable way, and most certainly can not destroy it, unless it was made of antimatter. The moon has had its fair share of impacts and is still standing.
Also, the effect of the Moon on the Earth's rotation is extremely slow, so even if it disappeared (somehow magically without crashing into the planet and destroying it completely, or even without raining a hell of debris on it and destroying life on the surface) we wouldn't have to worry about it for millions of years. In fact, while the moon does have a stabilizing effect on the axis of our planet, it also slows its rotation down, so getting rid of it might be a good thing... bring on the antimatter asteroids, please.
"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Mankind Creeps Closer to Fusion Power Era as Calif. Lab Nearly "Breaks Even"
October 9, 2013, 7:12 AM
NASA Introduces Asteroid Grand Challenge to Protect Earth
June 18, 2013, 8:48 PM
Iran Successfully Sends Monkey on Sub-Orbital Flight
January 28, 2013, 6:08 PM
Researchers: If Meteorite Hit 13 Million Years Earlier, Dinosaurs Might Still be Around
October 30, 2012, 2:19 PM
Study: Bruce Willis Cannot Save Us from Armageddon
August 9, 2012, 9:39 PM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information