Print 67 comment(s) - last by EricMartello.. on Oct 6 at 6:04 AM

Features is not yet triggered, presumably may be turned on shortly

A teardown of the upcoming update to Gmail for Android -- Gmail 4.6 -- revealed numerous confirmations that ads lay lurking in the update from Google Inc. (GOOG), as well as showcasing some welcome improvements.

Notably Android Police found strings, 8 classes, and even a full library with "Ad" in their names in the Gmail APK.  A big question left unanswered by the teardown is whether the feature will harass users with fake email ads, a feature added in a recent controversial update to the desktop browser client, or simply ad normal banner ads like those found in many free (ad-supported) Android games.

The Droid Guy is claiming the changelog for Gmail 4.6 hints that the new mobile ads will be in the form of email spam.

Gmail 4.6 Gmail unsent Gmail 4.6
Gmail 4.6 [Image Source: Android Police]

The update does bring some welcome changes in a heavy overhaul to the Gmail card, including a warning about unset messages, new icons for contacts you don't have a picture of (a stylish letter from their first initial), and darker UI icons.

Gmail 4.6 Gmail auto picture
left: Before the autopicture; right: After the update. [Image Source: Android Police]

The reviewers were indifferent or perhaps slightly negative on the decision to do away with the "cancel" button in the email "send" dialogue, which now requires you to press the "back" button (beneath the screen) to cancel.

Most Android users should get the tile "upgrade" sometime later this week, bringing their freeloading mobile Gmail days to an end.

Sources: Android Police, The Droid Guy

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Just another reason
By MechanicalTechie on 9/30/2013 9:47:36 PM , Rating: 2
I'm puttin my money on Duckduckgo :)

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/1/2013 11:08:02 AM , Rating: 1
I find Bing is as Good as Google on search now and Yahoo could even make a comeback.

Nokia Maps is better than Google Maps.
Nokia downloads the entire trip onto the mobile device saving data usage also it doesn't require a constant data connection.

They also have an online Map system.

Keep in Mind Microsoft is purchasing Nokia and Microsoft has the patent on excluding bad neighborhoods from travel/mapping applications.

RE: Just another reason
By MattCoz on 10/1/2013 11:13:06 AM , Rating: 2
Yahoo beat Google to putting ads in their app.

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/1/2013 11:30:57 AM , Rating: 1
If history has anything to say is that Search Engines come and go and Google search is getting kind of boring its also the target of every spammer out there. They have some of the best algorithms bar none but once the spammers figure Google out its back to being a mess. This will of course happen to the best of search engines but Google is becoming boring and way to aggressive with the spam cramming it into every nook and cranny they can to the point where its becoming annoying to use their products.

RE: Just another reason
By bug77 on 10/1/2013 12:06:49 PM , Rating: 2
So... your money is on someone else providing free email, search, docs, maps, whatever WITHOUT ads?

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/1/2013 1:14:18 PM , Rating: 3
No what Im saying is if the ads become invasive enough that it feels like you can never get to the data your looking for you wind up going somewhere else being less invasive.

I use IMDB significantly less than I used to for movie trailers because of the repetitive and frequent 30 second ads I have to sit through before I can watch the movie trailer. If the movie company wants to get me to see their movie pay to have the ads removed and let me watch the trailer. I get through 3 movie trailers on IMDB before I give up and go elsewhere because of the commercials. The Movie trailers are already commercials why do I have to sit through a commercial to watch a commercial?

I dont use HULU anymore and I use VIPTV.NET now because of all the commercials ruin shows on Hulu. I paid for the programming to be streamed I didnt pay for the commercials.

If google gets too invasive with the ads people will go elsewhere. has ads but they are off to the side much less invasive to me using e-mail.

Facebook has gotten extremely annoying with the inline ads that I'm using Facebook less and less.

How many people wont use DT without an ad blocker in place because you can overdue it with the ads. We even saw a screenshot a while back of a DT Author and they were using firefox with an ad blocker.

The assumption of more ads = more revenue reaches a point where its counter productive and people move on. I have a message in my google mailbox right now on how I can be more effective with google ads by putting multiple rows of them on my sites. Its right next to the e-mail about site performance which when you measure my site performance the slowest item to display is the ads and they want me to put more of them up.

RE: Just another reason
By bug77 on 10/1/2013 6:09:10 PM , Rating: 2
You do realize we're talking about Google here, don't you? There's not a single product they have that has intrusive ads. And not by chance, it's because they're trying hard not to be invasive.
Yes, it's not impossible that will change in the future, but complaining about it now seems a little far fetched.

RE: Just another reason
By Reclaimer77 on 10/1/2013 1:50:10 PM , Rating: 2
It's Mitch, so of course he's going to come off anti-Google.

I guess Google has become "boring" the same way that the refrigerator or sidewalk has. It's like an appliance at this point, but that's not a bad thing necessarily, is it? It's a search engine, I don't need it to be sexy or exciting, just reliable.

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/1/2013 3:38:22 PM , Rating: 1
Its Reclaimer hes going to come off anything thats not google or samsung.

How has Google changed in the last X years its the same thing except you can buy your rank instead of earn it.

RE: Just another reason
By ritualm on 10/1/2013 7:10:51 PM , Rating: 2
How has Google changed in the last X years its the same thing except you can buy your rank instead of earn it.

Every other company does the same thing. Want more favorable treatment? Pay more money. It's not the same as bribery, but it's getting there.

Your arguments are null.

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/2/2013 12:18:23 AM , Rating: 2
We can call it what it is its bribery and deceitful business practices.

'This Post Is Sponsored by Google': Google Caught (Gasp) Buying Links?

RE: Just another reason
By Reclaimer77 on 10/2/2013 12:28:27 AM , Rating: 2
It's amazing what passes for a controversy these days lol. Bribery and deceit, why stop there? Accuse them of murder while you're at it.

RE: Just another reason
By Reclaimer77 on 10/1/2013 11:25:15 PM , Rating: 2
Could you possibly be more transparent in your ignorance and hate?

Google has changed MUCH in the last X years, some for the better some not. On the fly language translation? Ability to viewed a cached website? Navigation maps to locations directly in the search page?

These are just a few off the top of my head. Why is it so important to you that Google seem "boring" and unchanging to you anyway?

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/2/2013 12:15:48 AM , Rating: 2
I expect nothing less from you because anything anti-reclaimer likes is always ignorance, hate, or must work for them. Your comments are old and predictable.

Google the search engine is getting stale its good at what it does then every couple months they have to change the algorithm to try and defeat spam. It should be evolving more.

Its like Microsoft doing the same thing it gets old and feels dated that's what Google search feels like it needs an overhaul or a facelift.

RE: Just another reason
By Reclaimer77 on 10/2/2013 12:45:30 AM , Rating: 2
Speaking just for myself, 99% of all my Google searches are done via my browsers search bar. I hardly ever actually visit the Google homepage, so a "facelift" wouldn't mean a thing to me. What matters to me is the search results, as useful as possible, as fast as possible.

You seem to be just throwing a lot of opinions and hyperbole at the issue. Instead of just arbitrarily saying that Google is "stale", can you actually suggest what it is they should do? Some feature or something? I would honestly be interested in some substance.

every couple months they have to change the algorithm to try and defeat spam. It should be evolving more.

Uhh would you rather they NOT fight spam??

Either you're really bad at articulating what exactly you would like to see from Google, or you're going out of your way to find negatives. Considering the source, my money is on the latter of those two.

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/2/2013 8:42:13 AM , Rating: 2
See you in a few years when Google starts losing market share and starts cloning everyone else who's moving forward beyond boring text searches that google provides today.

RE: Just another reason
By retrospooty on 10/2/2013 8:48:33 AM , Rating: 2
Sounds alot like MS today. ;)

RE: Just another reason
By Reclaimer77 on 10/2/2013 9:14:26 AM , Rating: 2
If something better than Google comes out, then I'll switch to it. Duh?

I don't use Google because of their market share or stock price or their namesake.

Are you even hearing yourself?

RE: Just another reason
By Mitch101 on 10/2/2013 6:33:49 PM , Rating: 2
Your so transparent and full of crap its not worth communicating with you.

RE: Just another reason
By EricMartello on 10/6/2013 6:04:52 AM , Rating: 2
So your whole anti-google tirade revolves around you having a problem with them making money by inserting ads into products and services they offer to people for free?

It seems to me that your ire should be directed toward the total lack of legal protection for email as a communication medium. The misguided "war on spam" that every nerd seems to feel justified in participating in is effectively a form of censorship.


"Spam" isn't defined specifically, and one man's spam is another man's email that he was waiting for and never the very notion that people are complaining about "ad spam" being inserted by google or receiving "spam email" they claim they "never signed up for" is a load of crap in both cases because they got exactly what they asked for.

The transmission of any email that is not perpetuating an illegal activity should be legally protected from any kind of invasive scans by the service providers or any intermediary networks.

All emails to and from google or any other email service provider are scanned - and this is what allows the ads to be injected in the first place.

If you want your emails to remain private, unauthorized content scanning needs to be made illegal under law, so that the next time google or yahoo decide to scan your email under the guise of "stopping spam" (but in reality to show you ads based on the content of the email message) you can file a lawsuit against them for interfering with private communications.

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki