Print 77 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Oct 10 at 11:56 PM

Verleger said that oil prices would be $15 to $40 a barrel higher than they are today without ethanol added in

A new analysis shows that American consumers are saving anywhere from millions to even trillions of dollars annually at the pump thanks to ethanol blends.
According to the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) -- which presented information from former Ford and Carter administration energy advisor Philip Verleger -- American consumers are paying between 50 cents and $1.50 per gallon less for gasoline due to the addition of ethanol blends (such as E15, which is 15 percent ethanol and 85 percent gasoline). 

The analysis further said that consumers are saving from $700 billion to about $2.6 trillion annually on gas because of ethanol. 

Verleger said that oil prices would be $15 to $40 a barrel higher than they are today without ethanol added in. 
“Had Congress not raised the renewable fuels requirement, commercial crude oil inventories at the end of August would have dropped to 5.2 million barrels, a level two hundred million barrels lower than at any time since 1990,” said Verleger. “The lower stocks would almost certainly have pushed prices higher. Crude oil today might easily sell at prices as high as or higher than in 2008. Preliminary econometric tests suggest the price at the end of August would have been $150 per barrel.” 

AAA said the national average is about $3.50 a gallon and the cost per barrel is around $100-$110.

E15 in particular has been a hot topic this year. In August, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) froze a planned bump in ethanol levels that was set for next year. The freeze came after state efforts to ban E15, and House debates on whether to cut the blending requirements entirely.

In 2012, only 4.55 billion bushels of corn was used to produce ethanol, which was down from 5 billion bushels in 2011.  About 13.33 billion gallons of ethanol was produced last year, missing the goal of 15.2 billion gallons.

Ethanol opponents say the use of ethanol blends takes away from the nation's corn crops, and livestock farmers saw the cost of feed inflated by having to compete with ethanol. In addition, environmentalists say corn ethanol produces more emissions over its life cycle than oil.

Furthermore, ethanol can damage many old vehicles (and even some new) on American's roads because parts in the engines made of rubber, plastic, metal, and other materials aren't made for high ethanol blends. 

Later in August of this year, big oil firms filed a request to cut the ethanol target for 2014. The EPA announced that refiners must blend in 18.15 billion gallons during 2014 under The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007's (EISA) Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) terms. The oil industry, however, wants that target to be slashed 3.35 billion gallons to a total of 14.8 billion gallons. 

Source: Ethanol Producer

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: uh-huh
By Reclaimer77 on 9/25/2013 3:41:22 PM , Rating: 3
Lol yeah, I love this one:

The analysis further said that consumers are saving from $700 million to about $2.6 trillion annually on gas because of ethanol.

Hmmm could they possibly narrow down this margin a bit? From millions to over two trillion!!?? Reaaaal believable. What kind of "analysis" is that!

RE: uh-huh
By arazok on 9/25/2013 4:20:54 PM , Rating: 3
Even saying 2.6 trillion as a top estimate completely destroys your credibility.

The US GDP is 16 trillion. Your telling me that diluting 15% of your gas with ethanol is going to save the economy 15% of GDP per year? That’s $8,000 for every man, woman, and child.

People would notice that sort of massive change.

RE: uh-huh
By ClownPuncher on 9/26/2013 1:22:33 PM , Rating: 2
Progressives wouldn't lie in an attempt to try and control your life. Right?

RE: uh-huh
By Just Tom on 9/25/2013 5:47:29 PM , Rating: 2
Looking at the article I am pretty sure the trillion is a typo; the quoted savings is from .50 to 1.50 per gallon, savings of 700 million to 2.6 billion would be reasonable.

RE: uh-huh
By Just Tom on 9/25/2013 5:50:56 PM , Rating: 2
Edit, it was a typo except in the other direction. The claimed savings are between 700B and 2.4T.

RE: uh-huh
By Shig on 9/25/2013 8:16:30 PM , Rating: 2
The corn lobby has a lot of money and our political system is a joke, that about sum this up?

These "studies" show only what you want your view point to be.

"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki