Print 114 comment(s) - last by Piiman.. on Oct 5 at 12:50 PM

  (Source: Apple)
Chaos Computer Club unlocks iPhones with high resolution-image based tactic, points out legal dangers

For iPhone owners that use the fingerprint sensor as a password, be aware that it's pretty much useless from a security perspective.  It turns out that as with past inexpensive fingerprint readers, the system could easily be tricked by showing it a photograph of the target's fingerprint.

A site sponsored a crowd-funded competition to see who could be the first to crack the security feature found on the new Apple, Inc. (AAPLiPhone 5S.  The prize -- which included a pledge of $10,000 USD from a Chicago-based venture capital fund -- attracted a lot of attention.

I. CCC Makes Short Work of Apple's Supposedly Secure Sensor

It appears that the first group to successfully circumvent the sensor's security was the veteran Chaos Computer Club (CCC), a German hacker ring that has accomplished many challenging hacks and exploits over the years.

The trick -- as a CCC member who goes by the handle "Starbug" states -- is to use at least 2,400 dots per inch (dpi) for the photograph of the target's fingerprint, and 1,200 dpi for the printed copy.  Comments "Starbug", "In reality, Apple's sensor has just a higher resolution compared to the sensors so far. So we only needed to ramp up the resolution of our fake.  As we have said now for more than years, fingerprints should not be used to secure anything. You leave them everywhere, and it is far too easy to make fake fingers out of lifted prints."

The hack is demonstrated in a video posted by the CCC to YouTube:

The only "trick" outside the resolution is that you need to print onto a transparent sheet and after printing; you need to lift the fingerprint onto a polymer using "pink latex milk or white woodglue".  The latex layer is then cured and lifted, and breathed upon to "make it a tiny bit moist and then placed onto the sensor to unlock the phone."

Don't make it too moist, though as the fingerprint sensor can only be used with "dry" fingers.

iPhone 5S sensor
The iPhone 5S's sensor can easily be tricked with a "fake finger". [Image Source: Apple]
It's important to note that the only part of the process that involves the target user -- getting their fingerprint -- can be done quickly and surreptitiously.  The remaining steps can be taken at their own pace at a secure location of the unlocker's choosing.

II. Another Danger -- Police Seizing Your Data

CCC spokesperson Frank Rieger chides Apple and others for proliferating the myth of security regarding fingerprint-based biometrics.  He states:

We hope that this finally puts to rest the illusions people have about fingerprint biometrics. It is plain stupid to use something that you can't change and that you leave everywhere every day as a security token.  The public should no longer be fooled by the biometrics industry with false security claims. Biometrics is fundamentally a technology designed for oppression and control, not for securing everyday device access.

The group raises another interesting point regarding smartphone unlocking and legality.  The group writes:

Also, you can easily be forced to unlock your phone against your will when being arrested. Forcing you to give up your (hopefully long) passcode is much harder under most jurisdictions than just casually swiping your phone over your handcuffed hands.

Police arrest
If you get arrested, and have an iPhone with fingerprint unlock enabled, police can easily get ahold of your private data. [Image Source: BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY FIVE]

In other words, the supposed "crowning" feature on Apple's new smartphone may be worse than worthless -- it may be luring users into a false sense of security and compromising their data.

The site says the CCC was the first group or individual to report a successful hack on the sensor.  The site is in the process of confirming the CCC's hack.  Once confirmed they'll receive the horde of goodies, including sweet, sweet cash.

Sources: CCC [press release], Is Touch ID Hacked Yet [YES!], YouTube [CCC]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: yup
By superstition on 9/23/2013 2:06:43 PM , Rating: -1
I've always been pissed at Apple for not copying more. After all, there was Microsoft Bob. Bob could have been big.

Imagine how popular Bob would have been if Apple has pushed him to all its stupid customers.

But, sadly, true innovation is often lost on the consumer world, because people buy into the copycat fluff. Windows wasn't successful at all, even though it came out after the Lisa OS and the Mac OS. It's a true shame.

RE: yup
By Motoman on 9/23/2013 2:09:03 PM , Rating: 2
Imagine how popular Bob would have been if Apple has pushed him to all its stupid customers.

iBob would be the king of the world at this point, if that had happened. Or maybe iClippy.

RE: yup
By Bostlabs on 9/23/2013 3:30:08 PM , Rating: 3
Nah, now it it was called iSteve...

Apple couldn't keep that in stock. :)

The fingerprint reader is just an ease of use security device. The easier you make it for the user, the easier you make it for the bad guys.

Let's see... How about retina scan + DNA sample via your breath + facial scan + voice recognition + a complex security phrase.

15 minutes later you can use your phone. LOL!

Best security? Keep the phone turned off and encased in cement. Be tough to use it but it would be secure. :D

RE: yup
By superstition on 9/23/2013 7:29:52 PM , Rating: 2

RE: yup
By superstition on 9/23/2013 7:33:48 PM , Rating: 2
I've always been pissed at Apple for not copying more. After all, there was Microsoft Bob. Bob could have been big. Imagine how popular Bob would have been if Apple has pushed him to all its stupid customers.

People can hide Bob, but Bob will be back and he will win.

RE: yup
By augiem on 9/23/2013 7:09:47 PM , Rating: 4
Lisa OS and the Mac OS

Apple's "innovative" OS's that MS copied were copied from Xerox, who gets no credit to this day lost behind the commercial success of the Mac.

Every element is there in Parc/Alto/Star. Icons, folders, right click context menus, windows, etc. 1979, Parc was 4 years before Lisa and Star was 2 years before.

So, yes, the copycat did win. Both of them.

RE: yup
By superstition on 9/23/13, Rating: -1
RE: yup
By superstition on 9/24/2013 6:00:02 PM , Rating: 2
A graphical interface was described in the 60s, so I suppose Xerox was a copycat, too?

The Mac OS and the Lisa OS were considerably different, but you would have to have used them to know that.

But, really, the pinnacle of innovation was Windows 1.0. What a revolution for computing it was.

The Alto was not even close to the Lisa OS in terms of consumer-friendly functionality and polish. And, the Lisa productivity software was nothing to sneeze at, either.

"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki