Print 50 comment(s) - last by SPOOFE.. on Sep 24 at 6:21 PM

It made $800 million in the first 24 hours

"Grand Theft Auto V" is shattering sales records with $1 billion in sales in just the first three days of availability.

Take-Two Interactive -- which is the distributor of the hot new video game -- announced that GTA V's $1 billion sales in three days blasts the record of any other video game, film or entertainment product ever released. 

In its first day alone, GTA V grossed over an enormous $800 million

“Grand Theft Auto is a cultural phenomenon and Rockstar Games continues to redefine what can be achieved in interactive entertainment," said Strauss Zelnick, Chairman and CEO of Take-Two. “We are incredibly proud of the extraordinary critical and commercial response to Grand Theft Auto V.”

GTA V cost between $200 million and $250 million and took about five years to make. The last installment in the series -- GTA IV -- was released in 2008. 

For comparison purposes, Activision Blizzard Inc's "Call Of Duty: Black Ops II" took 15 days to hit $1 billion in global sales after being released in November 2012. Its first-day sales hit $500 million.

GTA V gameplay allows gamers to cruise around a fictional world based on real-life locations such as Los Angeles. For those with youngsters, it does feature adult material like carjacking, picking up prostitutes and murdering bystanders (which is typical for the series). 

The game was released September 17 and is available for Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. 

Source: Take-Two Interactive Software

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Sheeeeit!
By SPOOFE on 9/21/2013 4:56:16 AM , Rating: 0
While that may technically be true, the vast majority of PC's can't play a game of GTA 5's graphical fidelity, "aging console hardware" notwithstanding. A huge portion of the PC gaming market is games with low system requirements.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By Monkey's Uncle on 9/21/2013 8:56:04 AM , Rating: 2
Oh man, that is so funny. Where do you get that idea?

All you need to play a game of this fidelity sat the same specs that a console runs at is:

1. A Dual core processor
2. 4GB of memory
3. A mid-level graphics card.

5.1 sound is already built. So is the hard drive & networking.

I would venture to say that most PCs on sale now would cover this. If they can't, they can be expanded. Can you say the same for consoles?

And yes, there are at least 50x as many PCs out in the wild than PS3s and XBox 360s. I would venture to say that at least half of those have specs that could match/beat either of these consoles.

What consoles provide to game developers is:

1. A closed platform with a known hardware configuration
2. Less possibility of piracy due to the closed platforms and DRM

And that my friend is pretty much it.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By BRB29 on 9/21/13, Rating: 0
RE: Sheeeeit!
By SlyNine on 9/21/2013 12:12:06 PM , Rating: 4
But then you realized that you are just pulling the numbers out of your ass.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By Monkey's Uncle on 9/21/2013 2:24:15 PM , Rating: 2
What you are not taking into account is that consoles may have been highly capable when they came out, but the PS3 is now 7 years old. The XBOX 360 is 8 years old. Technology moves fast in that amount of time.

The graphics processors in each of these (ATI Xenos X1800 derivative for the XBOX, Nvidia RSX G70 derivative for the PS3) may have been state of the art 8 years ago, gut both of them are outstripped even by current embedded graphics. I really was being generous to the consoles when I said Mid-level PC graphics are needed. Currently integrated video processors will handle the workload just fine at the same conditions these consoles run under.

But all of this really si moot since there was information leaked about a PC version of GTA V being released in time for the Black Friday/Christmas rush.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By Mitch101 on 9/22/2013 10:47:33 AM , Rating: 2
That's exactly what you needed to say to get the point across. If its not understood now give up before it gives you a headache.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By Makaveli on 9/21/2013 2:42:49 PM , Rating: 3
Just to add some facts to this.

1. A Dual core processor
2. 4GB of memory
3. A mid-level graphics card.

equals a low end computer which means you will be playing the game with everything set to low and it will look worse than playing in on a current gen console.

I agree with the rest of your post but that is a POS computer listed there and that game will run like ass on it.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By someguy123 on 9/21/2013 10:23:15 PM , Rating: 2
even an APU manages to outperform current gen consoles, which are already running 720p or lower with low quality settings. where do people get this idea that current gen consoles are above anything but low end PCs?

RE: Sheeeeit!
By MrBungle123 on 9/22/2013 2:34:57 PM , Rating: 2
where do people get this idea that current gen consoles are above anything but low end PCs?

A low end PC likely has several times the processing power of the consoles on tap.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By SPOOFE on 9/22/2013 4:44:08 PM , Rating: 2
And several times the overhead, netting less efficient use of hardware on the PC. But this has been well-documented and argued for the past, I dunno, almost fifteen years? Where've you been?

RE: Sheeeeit!
By SPOOFE on 9/22/2013 4:42:08 PM , Rating: 1
Oh man, that is so funny. Where do you get that idea?

PC sales numbers and Steam's hardware survey in particular, both providing data suggesting most PC's lack significant graphical power.

The healthiest segment of PC gaming are those games that don't require especially capable hardware. Thus, the suggestion that the PC platform is significant to high-fidelity games is a canard.

But I get it: The PC Master Race clowns are extremely hypersensitive to anything other than glowing, masturbatory praise of their Holy Platform, and anything that could possibly be interpreted as less-than-positive warrants a "burn at the stake" mentality.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By StevoLincolnite on 9/23/2013 12:43:51 AM , Rating: 2
They don't lack significant power.
Even Intel Decelerator graphics bundled for free can run console ports at 720P@30fps, aka, the same as the consoles.
And considering how cheap an Intel NUC is...

The PC games industry is a 20 Billion dollar market, Valve helped consolidate it and fixed many of the issues that plagued the market by providing convenience and a price gamers are willing to pay.
In comparison the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 is a 15.5 Billion dollar games market and that's two platforms combined.

As for the Steam survey specifically, 30% of systems weren't included as it falls into the "unknown" category, plus systems with nVidia's Optimus or the AMD equivalent don't show their discreet GPU's in the survey, only the Integrated chips, which is usually Intel.

Lastly, most people don't actually see a need to even upgrade, even a Core 2 Quad Q6600 overclocked a little, which is 6-odd years old and a $30-$40 Radeon 6570 is capable of playing 99% of games today at 720P easily enough.
When you have a highly popular, albeit demanding game, people upgrade, aka. "The Crysis Effect". (nVidia's profits actually rose after that games release.)

If you are someone who buys allot of games, the PC even works out cheaper than buying a console.
Sales are plentiful, with the addition of free online access.

The PC Gaming Master race is truly supreme. ;)

RE: Sheeeeit!
By degobah77 on 9/23/2013 10:50:01 AM , Rating: 2
Wait, so I didn't need to buy a $450 video card to play the latest games like Far Cry 3? I just need a $35 budget card and I can play everything at the lowest settings and be perfectly happy! Yeah!

This is the strangest argument ever. Most people's PCs are off the shelf Dells and HPs that have NO graphical ability other than Solitaire. And Intel graphics can play current console games? L-O-L. Play Far Cry 3 on integrated Intel anything and tell me how your experience is, please. Do it. For all of us. I'd like to know just how fantastic it is.

I have all consoles and a gaming PC. I've gone through dozens of video cards throughout the years, from budget to high performance and to say low end PCs can compete with dedicated gaming hardware is ridiculous. I've seen it first hand, it does NOT happen.

RE: Sheeeeit!
By SPOOFE on 9/24/2013 6:21:47 PM , Rating: 1
Even Intel Decelerator graphics bundled for free can run console ports at 720P@30fps, aka, the same as the consoles.

... Okay. So it's "the same as the console".

Why not just get a console?

The PC games industry is a 20 Billion dollar market,

Only a fraction of which consists of high-fidelity, cutting-edge AAA titles. Don't be absurd.

If you are someone who buys allot of games, the PC even works out cheaper than buying a console.

You've done an excellent job hashing out the usual PC-wank canards. "If you buy more games than you can possibly play, PC gaming comes out cheaper!"

Yeah, but only an idiot buys a hundred games a week, knowing he/she'll only ever be able to play a tiny percent of those.

The PC Gaming Master race is truly supreme. ;)

Supremely full of shit, yeah.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki