Cookie Cure? Google Preps "AdID" to (Supposedly) Limit NSA, Advertiser Snooping
September 19, 2013 8:42 AM
comment(s) - last by
But will an NSA backdoor be built in?
Google Inc. (
knows where you are
. Google knows where you were. Google guesses when you are sleeping. It knows when you are likely awake. It knows if you've been good. And it
definitely knows if you've been bad
Some say Google knows too much -- particularly since recent disclosures reveal it
begrudgingly stores and hands data to
U.S. National Security Agency
breaks the law thousands of times a year
spy on thousands, if not millions, of Americans
-- many of whom have never committed a crime.
I. Google Crafting Potential "Anonymous" ID Alternative to Cookies
In the wake of the
privacy scrutiny from the EU
, Google thinks it has a novel solution -- AdID. Google has reportedly been distributing a closed door proposal to advertisers, which would do away with cookie based advertising, which is based on small residual text files stored in local directories on your machine which are often backed up to the cloud. Cookies uniquely identify the user -- but they often give away too much, showing logs of urls which reveal things you've bought, where you are, and more.
Google spokesman Rob Shilkin comments mysteriously:
Technological enhancements can improve users' security while ensuring the Web remains economically viable. We and others have a number of concepts in this area, but they're all at very early stages.
So far few partners and privacy advocates have received the pending proposal, but
The USA Today
's sources say that will change in a matter of weeks.
Google is contemplating an anonymous replacement for third party cookies.
Google's example will be closely watched, as it's not only the world's biggest internet advertiser, it's also the maker of the most used browser, Chrome. Chrome has past the Mozilla Foundation's Firefox -- long in second place -- and Microsoft Corp.'s (
) Internet Explorer -- previously the most used browser.
Google also controls Android, a mobile smartphone platform that today accounts for four out of every five smartphones sold. Android is one of the biggest targets of mobile advertising.
If Google bans cookies in Chrome and Android, it would shake the market.
Some are cookies are the internet's ugly children. [Image Source: Magdex USA]
Not all are fans of the idea even if it
help with privacy. Comments Zach Coelius, CEO of ad technology firm Triggit to
The USA Today
, "Restricting third-party cookies isn't going to make relevant advertising go away; it just hands more power to big companies."
Mike Zaneis, general counsel for
The Interactive Advertising Bureau
(IAB), an advocacy that represents internet advertisers, says that relying on propriety "anonymous" solutions and banning third party cookies is a dangerous power grab. He comments, "They could deprecate the use of that ID on a whim, basically, and severely undermine billions of dollars in digital ad spending."
II. Blocking on the Rise -- But Can it Really Stop Powerful Interests?
The IAB and third party advertisers are very nervous as Mozilla recently made the controversial decision to block many third-party cookies in Firefox. Mozilla has yet to fully implement that decision and has appeared to punt more than once, as it
develops a block list
for which cookies to allow. It's unclear whether the delays are simply from technical limitations, or if the criticisms of the IAB and other groups are weakening Mozilla's resolve.
Apple, Inc. (
) and Microsoft were actually the first to roll out features allowing users easy routes to ban cookies. Microsoft in Dec. 2010 offered the "Do Not Track" (DNT) feature in Internet Explorer 9, then in Aug. 12 made DNT default to on, with the release of Windows 8's IE version, IE 10. Apple meanwhile, has long offered cookie management options in its menus and as of
offered an easy button option ("never") to always opt out of third party cookies.
The IAB has published "FAQS" complaining about
Mozilla's pending solution
IE 10's default on DNT
Google snuck around Apple's options to unblock cookie tracking among Safari users.
[Image Source: BlogSpot]
Google, meanwhile arguably has the weakest protections against unwanted cookies. In fact Google was
punished with a $22.5M USD fine in 2012
seemingly sneaking around Apple's cookie blocking features
with misleading plug-ins.
AdIDs feature stronger privacy protections including (reportedly) encryption, encryption, a 1 year
, and the ability to spawn a secondard AdID when doing browsing you want to keep private (e.g. watching your favorite furries porn video).
Even the most robust forms of cookie blocking can't fully stop the Obama administration from illegally spying on you. [Image Source: AP]
The real question is whether or not AdIDs will really safeguard your identity from Big Brother -- powerful nation states like the U.S. that increasingly feel the need to "watch" all communications on the internet. Unless Google publishes the standard in an open specification it's impossible to know how robust it is.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Sorry Google, I no trust you...
9/20/2013 1:11:59 AM
Sorry Google, but there is no way I will trust you when it comes to protecting myself from advertisers, when you are one of the worst offenders. You constantly ignore "DO NOT TRACK", make a deal with adBlock to allow your ads through, and then insist on bombarding me with ads for products where I may have visited the website friggin' once to see what it was, and now it's plastered on just about every site I go to. WTF!!
So, go to hell Google! And I am super effin' glad I don't use gMail... that's a whole other bag of Google's dirty gym socks
RE: Sorry Google, I no trust you...
9/20/2013 10:42:43 AM
Out of the frying pan, into the deep fryer, is more like it.
If you think Google's stuff is horrible, keep your head buried in the sand please, because the alternatives are just as awful.
“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer Feared Treason for Failing to Comply with NSA Requests
September 13, 2013, 10:54 AM
Audit: NSA Agents Broke the Law Nearly 3,000 Times from 2011 to 2012
August 16, 2013, 2:40 PM
NSA Admits to "Touching" 1.6 Percent of Total Global Web Traffic
August 13, 2013, 5:27 PM
Report: NSA is Reading Your Email, Chats without Warrant
July 31, 2013, 5:40 PM
February 18, 2013, 11:56 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information