backtop


Print 23 comment(s) - last by Ammohunt.. on Sep 4 at 1:55 PM


The Cadillac Super Cruise demo  (Source: engadget.com)
The demonstration showed Super Cruise controlling a a Cadillac SRX SUV

General Motors (GM) said years ago that it planned to take the lead in self-piloted vehicles by the end of the decade, and now, its keeping up with that goal by looking to release a nearly-autonomous vehicle by 2020. 

GM showed off its "Super Cruise" system in a demonstration in Michigan last week. The system uses cameras and radar to steer the car, keeping it in between the lines on streets and highways.

This system is a result of other available tehnologies seen today, such as radar-guided cruise control and warning systems for when drivers start drifiting out of their lane. But Super Cruise takes it a step further by controlling the electric power steering. 

The demonstration showed Super Cruise controlling a a Cadillac SRX SUV, and according to reporters in attendance, the technology looked good.

While the demo was a success, the autonomous steering system isn't ready for the road on a commercial level quite yet. Engineers say they still need to work on how the system reacts to road conditions, sensor reaction time, visibility of lane lines and interaction with the driver. 
 
But engineers say the system could be ready by the end of the decade. It would initially appear in Cadillacs, but would likely be apart of the rest of the GM lineup later on. 

Last week, Nissan said it will push aggressively to release an autonomous vehicle by 2020 as well. The automaker has been working with several colleges such as MIT, UC Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, Oxford, the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, and almost every major university in Japan to develop the autonomous technology.

Nissan wants the autonomous cars to be available across the model range within two vehicle generations and to have an affordable price for consumers. 

Source: USA Today



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I want it full autonomous
By Kakaoriginal on 9/3/2013 7:56:39 AM , Rating: 2
I don't want to drive at all. I want it to leave me at my work place entrance and go park itself. Then if my wife needs it she will call it and it will go there to get her. And while she is busy the car will get the kids at school. No need for multiple cars per house. Could it be real some day?




RE: I want it full autonomous
By SublimeSimplicity on 9/3/2013 10:34:24 AM , Rating: 3
Take it a step further. Why would most people even own a car?

Call a "taxi" via your smartphone when you need one. With no driver to be paid the cost of transportation would be much cheaper than owning your own.


RE: I want it full autonomous
By trisct on 9/3/2013 2:29:32 PM , Rating: 2
But you would lose convenience points by waiting for a car, and you would have all the same inconveniences as a driven taxi - you couldn't leave all your stuff in the back seat, trunk, etc. It isn't just price that makes people own cars rather than take taxis.


RE: I want it full autonomous
By Ammohunt on 9/3/2013 2:39:44 PM , Rating: 3
I am with you! i don't want any responsibitly at all i want industry/government to do it all for me, feed me, dress me, drive my car for me..think for me.


RE: I want it full autonomous
By Jeffk464 on 9/3/2013 10:35:54 PM , Rating: 2
Join the army.


RE: I want it full autonomous
By Ammohunt on 9/4/2013 1:55:31 PM , Rating: 2
Obviously you have never been in the ARMY.


RE: I want it full autonomous
By Reclaimer77 on 9/3/2013 5:05:36 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah it's called 'public transportation'.

Do you also go everywhere in one of those senior citizen scooters because walking is SUCH a pain in the ass?


infrastructure
By DocScience on 9/3/2013 2:15:20 PM , Rating: 3
20th century America built paved roads to support the automobile and truck.

Is it too much to ask 21st Century America to paint and maintain retroreflective lines on the roads to support robot drivers?

Have we become this incompetent? This incapable?




anyone remember
By GulWestfale on 9/2/13, Rating: -1
RE: anyone remember
By exeedorbit on 9/2/2013 3:20:34 PM , Rating: 2
I honestly don't think that it would be the only way to drive the car. I think you've shown that you don't want the option at all, but I imagine that there are some people out there that would like the option to have the car drive itself, especially if it's a long, empty road.

What I don't like about these things is the same I don't like about services like On Star, it gives the companies even MORE ways of controlling what you can, and can not do. And that is where my issue lies.


RE: anyone remember
By lisa123 on 9/2/13, Rating: -1
RE: anyone remember
By ritualm on 9/2/2013 6:11:39 PM , Rating: 3
Self-driving tech should be a complement to human control, not a complete replacement. The latter merely creates a new problem while resolving an existing one.


RE: anyone remember
By Jeffk464 on 9/2/2013 8:29:45 PM , Rating: 2
You are probably right but as the technology gets better and better eventually we can go full autonomous. Of course by then the guy who did the voice over for kit will probably be dead so I don't know how we are going to make it work right. :)


RE: anyone remember
By Disorganise on 9/3/2013 1:09:20 AM , Rating: 2
Initially I was totally against the idea. However, I've thought of a useful use-case: congested areas.
It's been shown by Mythbusters that one car mis-applying the brakes can essentially cause a jam. If you handed control over the car, in theory could liaise with the the traffic management centre and optimise speeds etc to remove the jam (if all cars handed over control).
Having said that, I don't see why cars don't add some kind of wifi to chat to each other to provide warnings to the drive that the car ahead (or a few ahead) is slowing down and prepare to brake, with emergency braking being automated to some degree.
The fear, of course, is the havoc a hacker could wreak


RE: anyone remember
By flyingpants1 on 9/3/2013 1:34:59 AM , Rating: 2
In the beginning, you wouldn't even need inter-car communication. Cars would just watch eachother and match their speed accordingly, to avoid traffic waves or jams.


RE: anyone remember
By PaFromFL on 9/3/2013 8:20:33 AM , Rating: 2
I enjoy driving but I'd use it for long trips down interstate highways. All those little steering corrections get tiresome during a 20 hour trip.

The next step is self-assembling "trains" to reduce wind resistance, permit higher speeds, and reduce the number lanes needed for busy roads. The system could also be used with train tracks. The train would lose one set of trailing cars onto each siding and gain another set. Passengers would move to trailing cars when near their destination.


RE: anyone remember
By ERROR666 on 9/3/2013 1:14:38 PM , Rating: 2
Same here. I enjoy driving in general. Just not driving for 10-15 hours straight on some god forgotten highway while having to stick to 10 above speed limit. And I would gladly use a self driving car then but it doesn't resolve any of the problems. For example I honestly don't believe that you'll be able to take a 3 hour nap while it drives itself. Both from a legal standpoint and a common sense standpoint. If so - that doesn't help me. It only makes things worse. I'll simply struggle even more to stay awake while sitting still and doing absolutely nothing except for looking at a straight empty road ahead of me.


RE: anyone remember
By flyingpants1 on 9/3/2013 6:05:39 PM , Rating: 2
Why do you honestly not believe it?


RE: anyone remember
By Devilboy1313 on 9/4/2013 1:27:22 AM , Rating: 2
1) If the car causes an accident on auto-pilot will GM pay my insurance / medical bills?

2) Wouldn't it be better to spend the money on training people to drive, as compared to what I assume is the current policy of just giving driving licenses away to any idiot, or better yet funding a policy to just taking away the car from people who shouldn't be behind the wheel.

Yes, who sets the standards of what is a good driver and what is an idiot? I'd volunteer but then less than 1% of the world's population would be allowed to drive.


RE: anyone remember
By Jeffk464 on 9/2/2013 8:27:23 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
if this is developed properly (ie, not by GM)


Yeah, I definitely want the technology in my next car but GM should be working with google instead of going it on their own. When I think of the absolute highest level of computer programmers I don't think GM.


RE: anyone remember
By troysavary on 9/3/2013 6:08:35 PM , Rating: 1
Seeing the mess that Chrome is becoming and how shitty Android is, I don't think Google either.


w­ww.wo­rk25.C­om
By MarilynAKing on 9/3/13, Rating: -1
RE: w­ww.wo­rk25.C­om
By ebakke on 9/3/2013 10:36:55 AM , Rating: 2
Seriously. DT folks. Find a solution to these.


"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki