backtop


Print 51 comment(s) - last by rightwingidiot.. on Sep 15 at 10:16 PM

Defendant also sold access to Domino's Pizza domain and other targets; enters plea deal with feds

Consider yourself a "l337 h@X0r"?  Black and gray hats might want to leave their egos at the door after comparing their own illegal exploits to those of Andrew "green" Jackson Miller, a 24-year-old native of Lancaster and Devon, Penn.

The young hacker -- a member of the "Underground Intelligence Agency" (UIA) hacker ring -- over a three-year period from 2008 to 2011 scored root access to a number of corporate and academic computers and clusters.  But Green's biggest score came when he hacked into the Cray XT4 supercomputing cluster at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBL).  He gained that access by first hacking into a Japanese University's computer network, as well as Harvard University and the University of California at Davis's (UC Davis) computer networks.

This gave him access to the cluster's nearly tens of thousands of computer cores.

The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began to close in as Mr. Miller sold his illegally acquired access privileges in 2012.  Talking on internet relay chat (IRC) FBI agents posing as prospective cybercrime buyers recorded Mr. Miller bragging of hacked access to American Express Comp. (AXP), Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO), Google Inc. (GOOG), Adobe Systems Inc. (ADBE), WordPress, and many more.

The agents established a working relationship with Mr. Miller to lure him in.

Hopper
Hopper, one of LBL's supercomputers [Image Source: LBL]

They purchased access to Domino's Pizza, Inc.'s (DPZ) domain ($1,000), RNKTel (Mass.) administrative level customer database access ($1,000), and an ISP Layered Tech (Tex.) database with thousands of login credentials ($1,200).  The agents sent payments to Mr. Miller via Western Union Comp. (WU) money orders.

But when Mr. Miller offered to sell them access to the LBL supercomputer for $50,000 USD they arrested him.  Mr. Miller was taken into custody in June 2012 and charge with numerous computer fraud offenses.  His cohort Robert "Intel" Burns -- another UIA member -- pled guilty first, offering up evidence that the court used against Mr. Miller.

Faced with a likely unsuccessful fight to prove his innocence, on Tuesday Mr. Miller entered a plea deal [PDF] in which he reduced what could have been a sentence of 20 years, to 18 months behind bars, in exchange to pleading guilty to violations of:
In addition to his time served Mr. Miller faces three years of court supervision and may be required to pay damages to some of his victims, if he has the means.

Source: U.S. District Judge via Wired



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Sentence is a joke
By dgingerich on 8/29/2013 3:40:54 PM , Rating: 2
Often, no, they don't. Most people simply don't have the strength of will to overcome an addiction of the magnitude of cocaine or opium, let alone meth or heroine. Once they're in, they're stuck. Once someone gets them to try it once or twice, they're addicted, and they won't ever have the will to get out. It really is that tough.

I was addicted to nicotine for a while. it took a lot just to get off that, and that's barely half the strength of a cocaine addiction, and far, far weaker than a meth addiction. I know how tough nicotine is. Many illegal drugs must be impossible. That's why success rates of the few people who try to get away are so low, and only about 10% of those who get addicted even try to get away from it.

On top of that, there is a cost to getting clean, and it is much, much more than most addicts could afford. A six week stay in a low cost rehab clinic is about $100,000. Lindsay Lohan's stay at the rather upscale clinic was up over 5 times that. Lindsay Lohan's stay was ordered by the state as part of a criminal conviction, so the state had to pay for it. Those who try to do it on their own frequently find they can't afford it.


RE: Sentence is a joke
By Cheesew1z69 on 8/29/2013 3:50:35 PM , Rating: 3
They have THE OPTION of a CHOICE, people who are murdered DO NOT. I can't believe you are actually arguing this.

Simply put, equating someone who sells drugs to be worse than someone who murders another human being and that you feel that a drug peddler should get life while someone who TAKES ANOTHERS life is absolutely idiotic.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki