backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by woody1.. on Aug 28 at 8:57 AM


  (Source: sayanythingblog.com)
The administration is actively looking at a new round of loan requests

The Obama administration is looking to bring the $25 billion auto loan program back to life in an effort to reach its goal of putting 1 million plug-in electric vehicles on the road by 2015.

According to U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, the Obama administration is interested in reviving the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program, where it plans to draw a new round of loan requests. 

“We are looking at what a new (loan) solicitation might look like. That’s an ongoing discussion,” Moniz said. “We are actively looking at what might be an effective new (request for proposals).”

The administration is also looking to reexamine its lending criteria in order to avoid problems it encountered in the past. 

For instance, the program used to favor low-cost government loans to established automakers (and even startup automakers) to retool older plants for the development of advanced vehicles. But Moniz confirmed that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is not actively considering any applications for new retooling loans.

According to The Detroit News, The DOE has awarded less than $9 billion for auto plant retooling.

The Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program was created by Congress in 2007 in an effort to reach the goal of 1 million EVs on U.S. roads by 2015, but the program hasn't made a new loan since March 2011. This is mainly due to the fact that two of five companies that received government loans stopped production. 

One of these failures is Fisker Automotive, an auto startup that received $529 million in DOE loans back in April 2010. However, Fisker fell a little behind on its production schedule, and in May 2011, DOE froze the loans due to "unmet milestones." Fisker had only drawn $193 million of it at that point. It hasn't been able to build a car since July 2012, and is currently looking for a buyer so it doesn't have to claim bankruptcy. 

Another failure was Vehicle Production Group LLC, which is a Michigan-based startup building wheelchair-accessible compressed natural gas vehicles. It was awarded $50 million in loans back in March 2011, but has since halted production.

Last month, a House Appropriations Committee’s panel voted to cut the remaining funds in the $25 billion Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing loan program.

The Obama administration received a lot of flak for these failures, but the program wasn't all bad. The other three loans -- $5.9 billion to Ford, $1.4 billion to Nissan and $465 million to EV startup Tesla Motors -- proved to be successful. Tesla even managed to pay its full sum back nine years early, which was a great feat for a startup. 

Moniz said that 1 million EVs on the road by 2015 may not be doable at this point, but could happen in 2016 if EV production continues. Also, he mentioned that 100,000 plug-in vehicles in 2013 could be possible.

Source: The Detroit News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Simpler Way
By cruisin3style on 8/27/2013 4:10:40 PM , Rating: -1
Saying this only makes sense if you also don't agree with the Bush tax cuts that gave the rich more of their money back than the rest of us got. And we're not talking about that they make more money so with a fixed percentage they got more money back. We are talking about everyone receiving the same tax cuts, and then the top 2% receiving a total of $800 billion more.

Seems like picking winners and losers to me, or maybe even that they were already winners and they won some more


RE: Simpler Way
By KCjoker on 8/27/2013 8:57:59 PM , Rating: 2
You can't be this ignorant...I hope. It's as simple as said...the rich pay more taxes to begin with so if there is a tax cut they're going to get more back. Everyone can't receive the same tax cuts if everyone doesn't pay in the same amount or even the same %.


RE: Simpler Way
By cruisin3style on 8/27/2013 11:24:56 PM , Rating: 2
I'm beginning to think I might be ignorant, because you just explained back to me what I said in the first place.

I don't think what I said is ignorance so much as being idealistic...maybe

I'm not trying to attack you at all here, but I think you might be ignorant of how it worked. Everybody received a certain amount, let's say $1,000. Then ONLY the top 2% received additional funds that scaled to their income. I think I read in a magazine article that the tippity top .01 or .001% of income earners got $500-600k.

Why didn't the rest of us receive part of this percentage of income?

Maybe it isn't worth debating


"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki