Obama Admin. to Supreme Court: Allow Warrantless Smartphone Searches
August 22, 2013 7:12 PM
comment(s) - last by
Administration is upset about Circuit Court ruling that prohibits warrantless smartphone searches
President Barack Obama's (D) Assistant Attorney General (AG), Mythili Raman, and the
U.S. Department of Justice
(DoJ) have filed
to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to consider overriding a July decision by the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
warrantless cell phone searches
were a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The 1st Circuit Court sets precedent for Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island.
The Obama administration has
oft made the argument
that the Fourth Amendment -- which protects a citizen's "houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" --
is "inconvenient" for law enforcement
and should be pruned back to a much more limited form. In its argument in favor of
warrantless smartphone searches
, the President's staff argues that notebooks, calendars, and pagers have all been found in past SCOTUS or Circuit Court rulings to be searchable without warrant (not eligible for Fourth Amendment protections).
on academic law blog "The Volokh Conspiracy",
George Washington University
law school professor
, a prominent social libertarian points out a major flaw in the Obama administration's argument.
The Obama administration is pushing for warrantless smartphone searches.
[Image Source: Cole Hayes]
He points out that the administration appears to have cherry-picked a case involving an older device (the case in question involved an classic "dumb" cell phone seized in a 2007 crack cocaine bust of a Mass. man). He says that asking the court to consider a case with outdated information may be an attempt to lead them to an inaccurate conclusion. He writes:
Given that the argument for treating cell phones differently from physical items hinges on the storage capacity and services available through smartphones, I think it would be very helpful for the Court to take a case involving a smartphone instead of a more primitive model. In recent years,
smartphones quickly have become ubiquitous
: About 35% of Americans owned one by May 2011, 46% owned one by February 2012, and 56% owned one by May 2013. (In case you’re wondering, 91% of Americans have cellphones, so about 61% of cell phones owned as of May 2013 are smart phones.) Reviewing a case with an earlier model phone would lead to a decision with facts that are atypical now and are getting more outdated every passing month.
He argues that it would be better for the SCOTUS to examine a separate case that law professor
the SCOTUS to consider --
Riley v. California
. That case involved a 2009 search of a customer's Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd (
, an early smartphone. The case involved officers searching through a suspected gang member's smartphone for videos, pictures, and address book -- all without getting a warrant for the search, a key step of Fourth Amendment due process that prevents abuse.
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth District
declined to hear the
case, leaving SCOTUS as a potential route for a further appeal.
DOJ via The Washington Post [PDF]
The Volokh Conspiracy
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Says the Arrogant POS....er POTUS
8/24/2013 9:18:20 AM
"You get the presidents you deserve, dude. Blame yourself, don't blame Obama. Or hell, even Bush. "
How do you figure? These candidates are put in front of us and we're told to pick one. Who the hell picked them in the first place? Oh that’s right the party did, thanks but no thanks.
We get one of the two that were placed in front of us by the "man behind the curtain" So we basically get the President someone else wanted and since both parties are simply tag teaming us it doesn't matter who you vote for any more.
RE: Says the Arrogant POS....er POTUS
8/24/2013 11:18:55 AM
You picked the party.
But you are right in this regard. It doesn't matter what party you align with - republican or democrat. Both will take great pleasure in trampling your constitutional rights to gain more power over your lives.
"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer
Federal Appeals Court Rules Gov't Can Track Your Location Without Warrant
July 31, 2013, 2:47 PM
Obama's DOJ Tries to Sneak Around Supreme Court GPS Tracking Ruling, ACLU Upset
January 17, 2013, 2:08 PM
FBI Orders Google to Give it Access to Users' Locked Android Phones
March 15, 2012, 3:30 PM
UPDATED: U.S. Police Begin Warrantless Phone Data Grabs, ACLU Fights Back
April 21, 2011, 2:20 PM
Report: Opera Mini Has 35.6 Million Customers, Saves Them $8B USD Annually
October 28, 2009, 1:50 PM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple sued because of iPhone 6 Touch Disease
August 31, 2016, 7:00 AM
Get Ready to wait in line – iPhone 7 due September.
August 18, 2016, 7:15 AM
Robot Cameras Capture Gold at 2016 Olympics in Rio
August 16, 2016, 6:58 AM
Most Popular Articles
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information