U.S. Gov't Ask For Your Input on Reforming Copyright for the Digital Age
August 20, 2013 3:55 PM
comment(s) - last by
Patent reform will take a bit longer to come about
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) has taken its fair share of criticism of late, with some
calling it a "broken" system
. Verdicts like the
$1.92M USD verdict against Jammie Thomas-Rasset
for sharing 24 songs (eventually
reduced to $220,000 USD
) or Apple, Inc. (
threatening to sue the New York City
for using an Apple in a city greening campaign logo (Apple
has sued other companies
for using images of the fruit, claiming it owns trademark rights to all corporate artistic depictions of the fruit) have many convinced that the copyright system is in need of reform.
In a new request for public comment, that's part of a broader 122-page report, dubbed "
Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy
" [PDF], the
Internet Policy Task Force
U.S. Department of Commerce
(DoC) working group -- writes:
In recent years, the debates over copyright have become increasingly contentious. Too often copyright and technology policies are seen as pitted against each other, as if a meaningful copyright system is antithetical to the innovative power of the Internet, or an open Internet will result in the end of copyright. We do not believe such a dichotomy is necessary or appropriate.
It alludes to recent audits which
revealed rampant abuse
of the 1998
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
[PDF] (DMCA), including some businesses using fraudulent DMCA copyright infringement claims to temporarily takedown rival websites.
Copyright wars have raged for over a century in the U.S. as law clashed with new technologies.
The working group writes:
Establishing a multistakeholder dialogue on improving the operation of the notice and takedown system for removing infringing content from the Internet under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
The Task Force says it will "convene roundtable" sessions of public, corporate leaders, and copyright watchdog groups (e.g. the
Recording Industry Association of America
(RIAA)). It also says it will "solicit public comment". The paper offered no details on when or where the public can take advantage of these opportunities, but it advises interested citizens to "stay tuned for announcements."
At this point some of you may be thinking -- "Great, that covers copyright, but what about patents?"
Recall, with government bureaucracy and public indignation there's a certain latency/suffering period between whenever things go to the metaphorical Hades in a hand basket and when the government finally feels compelled to take action. The copyright wars
largely raged in the early 2000s
. By 2010 the RIAA had
mostly scuttled its campaign of threat letters against citizens
and while flashy infringement battles continued to emerge, much of the worse abuses were already said and done.
smartphone patent battles
, and the general
rise in patent trolling in the software industry
-- a present tense battle that emerged in full effect around 2010 -- may not be
resolved with reform
until 2020 or later, perhaps.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
8/21/2013 7:06:00 PM
You've missed the point that it's still illegal - you're still going to get a criminal record out of the deal (presumably for a misdemeanor), and potentially have to pay court/attorney's fees.
Nobody's getting a get out of jail free card. You're still going to jail...well, probably not actually going to jail. But you are going to get arrested, charged with a crime, and tried in court. You'll have that on your record, and you'll have to pay for lawyers and whatever other costs are involved in getting arrested and tried for a crime.
I'm just talking about the actual fines that you're ordered to pay as part of that process.
Say you get caught making Adobe CS6 available in some filesharing thing...and the cops can prove that one person downloaded it. That one person clearly hasn't got the financial chops to have ever actually purchased a copy of CS6 on his own...so the fine is $0. But you still got arrested. Still got convicted. Have to pay $X in court costs and perhaps $Y in lawyers' fees.
"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
Jammie Thomas-Rasset's Lawyers Appeal $222,000 Fine to Supreme Court
December 13, 2012, 11:52 AM
Microsoft Accidentally Issues DMCA Takedowns for U.S. Gov't, Google, Itself
October 8, 2012, 1:42 PM
U.S. Patent System is Broken, Declares Judge in Android v. Apple Cases
July 6, 2012, 1:12 PM
Analysis: Apple is Seeking 10,000x FRAND Rates in Patent Lawsuits
February 29, 2012, 6:15 AM
Can Microsoft and Apple Kill Google's Android with Lawsuits?
July 11, 2011, 1:56 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information