Print 29 comment(s) - last by First Reviewer.. on Aug 24 at 6:43 PM

High productivity requirements eliminate 20% time according to sources

Google has always been famous for its employee perks. From childcare to naps to gourmet meals, many other companies have tried to copy Google's perks in an effort to lure in and retain employees. One of Google's most interesting perks is what the company called 20% time.

20% time allowed employees to take a single day each week to work on side projects. Google's 20% time sparked some of the company's biggest innovations including its huge moneymaker AdSense, Gmail, Google Talk, and Google News. While Google hasn’t officially killed 20% time, it has made changes that have all but eliminated 20% time from the Google culture.

Quartz reports that Google has effectively shut down 20% time by requiring that all engineers get approval from management to use 20% time to work on independent projects. Previously, 20% time was the right of everyone who worked at Google. Taking that a step further, upper management at Google has reportedly discouraged managers from approving any 20% projects at all.

Those managers are judged on team productivity, which is measured by an internal analytics team who keep an eye on employee productivity. Reports indicate that the level of productivity these teams are required to deliver assumes that all employees are working on primary responsibilities 100% of the time.

Google CEO Larry page killed off Google Labs, which fostered the development of experimental projects. Employees using their 20% time created many of those Google Labs projects. 

Source: Quartz

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By idiot77 on 8/19/2013 10:50:46 AM , Rating: 5
Love or hate Apple and Google, it's safe to say one thing: Innovation is mostly dead.

Google got to where it is based a program to permit innovation. Now that's dead.

Apple, well, innovation there (if there was any bonafide innovation) died a couple years ago.

RE: Innovation
By Mitch101 on 8/19/2013 12:54:56 PM , Rating: 5
Innovation is alive and well at Apple they just cant figure out what to steal without Steve Jobs.

RE: Innovation
By superstition on 8/21/2013 4:16:11 PM , Rating: 2
Apple used to be called Microsoft's research arm.

Just compare the LisaOS to Windows 1.0.

Despite what people like to believe, the Lisa was quite a step beyond what had been done at Xerox. Apple just messed up the execution by bundling unreliable homebrewed "Twiggy" minifloppies, not using a fast enough 68000, failing to license the platform, and not marketing its Office suite effectively.

Apple had a sophisticated multitasking GUI system with an Office suite and protected memory in 1983 and let Microsoft steal it all, bit by bit.

RE: Innovation
By TSS on 8/19/2013 3:36:16 PM , Rating: 2
It might seem like a bad thing. But it's actually a good thing.

Google is powerfull enough as it is. Real innovation comes from companies that need to grow, that are limited in some way and have to work within those constraints. The more that becomes possible, the less that actually gets done.

Google had a good run and brought us many great things but now it's time for a new Google to arise, who will beat them at their own game. Just like Google beat all the search engines that came before it.

Considering the juggernaught Google is now i can't wait to see what wonderfull product comes out in order to do just that.

RE: Innovation
By blazeoptimus on 8/20/2013 12:40:22 AM , Rating: 2
It's a bit early to say innovation at Apple or Google is dead. Apple has typically had a several year gap between industry altering products (iMac, iPod, iPhone, iPad, etc), so it's a bit early to pronounce judgement. That being said, without Jobs, apples's chances are lower.

Apple's real innovation has always been its ability to take a pre-existing concept and turn into a product everybody wants. While there were tablets prior to the ipad, they were poorly executed (tablet pc, umpc). Apple essentially created the market. Prior to the iPhone, industry analysts would say "smart phones will never sell as well as normal cell phones since it requires more user interaction". Today, smartphones are outselling normal cell phones. That's largely thx to apple showing how things could work (app store independent of provider, easy to use interface without stylus or keypad, etc..). Again, the technologies weren't necessarily innovative, but the execution was. And because of this, these products turned out to be industry disrupting products.

As to google, I think the decision cuts both ways. I can easily see the 20% being abused, with little results to show for the wasted time over the past few years. I could see employees, over time, feeling entitled to use one day a week to do whatever they wanted. While the idea may have been great to begin with, given enough time, people will abuse any system put in place. It's human nature(the public sector/socialist countries are a good example of this). That being said, having Google move to a more capitalistic approach makes it more vulnerable to the traditional problems of larger companies that others have mentioned above.

I guess the real take home is "let's wait and see" how the next few years go. We should have a pretty good idea by then how deep the damage runs from these decisions/changes by then. If they fail to release anything or miss execute badly (say ios7 falls on its face pretty hard), we'll know.

"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki