backtop


Print 16 comment(s) - last by amypaige654.. on Aug 21 at 4:48 PM

Even as the taxman cometh internationally, a more crucial debate of regulation v. laissez-faire plays out

The U.S. dollar may be the true "world currency" in today's global economy, but Bitcoins -- a math-based "cryptocurrency" -- are offering a unique alternative to users worldwide.  Relatively secure and anonymous, the coins are controlled by hard and fast mathematical rules, not privately held banks.  As a result, they are emerging as a fast growing method of payment on the internet -- and even offline.

I. Federal Judge Says Ponzi Schemes Mandate Bitcoin Regulation

States -- particularly the U.S. -- are eyeing Bitcoins warily.  The anonymity is one concern, but officials are less worried about that because it only really disguises the path of money online; whenever an individual cashes out their bitcoins or uses them for online purchases, a trackable money/activity trail is created.  

Still, the extra anonymity (along with the inability of the federal government to regulate Bitcoin trading) prompted the Senate Committee on Homeland Security to write a letter [PDF] to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  In a letter they write that they don't want to "stifle a potentially valuable technology", but add that the government must "make sure that potential threats and risks are dealt with swiftly."

BitcoinAs Bitcoins grow more popular worldwide for both online and offline payments, U.S. regulators are cranking up the pressure on the cryptocurrency. [Image Source: GSM Solutions]

A major federal court case is exploring the legality of the Bitcoin.  The case involves Bitcoin Savings and Trust (BTCST), a Bitcoin hedge fund of sorts created by a man named Trendon Shavers.  Mr. Shavers is no stranger to high technology -- he cofounded Business Cogition, a Dallas, Tex. IT consulting firm.  

But when BTCST's hedge fund collapsed, Trendon "PirateAt40" Shavers was accused in court by his clients of running one of Bitcoin's first Ponzi schemes.  Earlier this month Federal Judge Amos Mazzant of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled that "Bitcoins can be used as money" and hence a Ponzi scheme lawsuit filed against Mr. Shavers by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can proceed.

Trendon Shavers
The SEC has charged Bitcoin "hedge fund" operator Trendon Shavers (right) with operating a Ponzi scheme. [Image Source: BitcoinTalk]

Aside from protecting investors, politicians are also warily eyeing Bitcoin as a tool for potential tax evasion.  Both state and federal U.S. regulators have recently started cracking down on cybercurrency exchanges that had not properly paid the fees to become a licensed money trader (and agreed to the bookkeeping necessary to get that license).  Most recently New York state regulators subpoenaed 22 different Bitcoin exchange operators, looking to make sure they were holding their users responsible for taxed income.  

Tax collectors in both Canada and the U.S. are starting to keep a more careful eye out for unreported Bitcoin income, although few individuals are believed to have been audited yet.

II. Germany Takes Libertarian Stance on the Bitcoin

The latest state to tackle these tough economic and fiscal questions is Germany, a member of the European Union.  The European Union has not issued a clear position on Bitcoin, so Germany started the debate itself.

German Finance Ministry laid out an argument that the Bitcoin should be taxed, but otherwise lightly regulated, in a recent reply to a question by a member of Parliament.  It argues that Bitcoins are a type of "private money" and that Bitcoin mining (the method by which Bitcoins algorithms slowly "seed" a stock of global currency, while rewarding users for putting computation power towards supporting the global Bitcoin cryptographic transactions)  is "private money creation".

Bitcoin smaller
Germany's Finance Minister says Bitcoins are taxable. [Image Source: Getty Images]

As a result, if you're a Bitcoin miner or day trader and you profit, you are subject to Germany's capital gains tax rate of 25 percent.  An important exception is if you horde the coins for more than a year, in which case they are viewed as a long term currency investment, and hence not subject to the capital gains tax.

This approach isn't all bad news for the traders and miners.  If you buy hardware to mine, you may now be able to write that off in part as a capital investment.  And if you lose money on trading, you may be able to reduce your taxes by claiming capital losses.

It appears that Germany is adopting a looser regulatory policy towards Bitcoins than the U.S. -- an approach that carries both additional opportunity and additional investor responsibility (due to the lighter protections).

Germany beer girl
Known for its high tech automobiles and classically produced brews, Germany appears to be adopting a more loose regulatory policy w.r.t. Bitcoins. [Image Source: Getty Images]

Parliamentarian Frank Schäffler—a member of the Free Democratic Party (FDP), a pro-business, center-right party— was pleased with this direction, commenting on Twitter:
Friedrich Hayek was among Austria's most prominent economists, who in the 20th century was a driving proponent of mostly laissez-faire regulation of capitalism, a regulatory philosophy which arose as early as 200 B.C. in China and later became popular in Europe and North America in the 18th century.  It's hard to put a label on Mr. Hayek, who billed himself as a "classic liberal", but today is viewed as more of a libertarian in American political terminology.  Despite doing some things to expand regulation, President Ronald Reagan (R) cited Mr. Hayek as a key source of inspiration.  Mr. Hayek's most vocal rival was John Maynard Keynes who condemned his opponent's philosophy in his seminal 1926 work The End of Laissez-faire.

Sources: Federal Judge Amos Mazzant [Texas], German Finance Minister



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Irony Overload
By Reclaimer77 on 8/19/2013 5:41:41 PM , Rating: -1
The fucking SEC accusing someone of operating a Ponzi scheme... Just...wow. Too much, that's just too much.




RE: Irony Overload
By JasonMick (blog) on 8/19/2013 6:25:50 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The fucking SEC accusing someone of operating a Ponzi scheme... Just...wow. Too much, that's just too much.
Kinda of like how the government is always tossing around the word "cartel".

If it's the FDA and big pharma industry colluding to drive up prices and offer certain otherwise illegal drugs (e.g. amphetamines, oxycotin, etc.) to the affluent who can afford them, it's "medication".

But if it's a street dealer selling those same drugs to a person they're "dealers", "cartels", "criminals". The line between criminality and legality in the U.S. seems often to have little to do with morality or fairness -- it's if you're conspiring with the government to make money, hiring ex-gov't officials and paying off key federal politicians, then your otherwise illegal behavior is suddenly "responsible enterprise".


RE: Irony Overload
By Reclaimer77 on 8/20/2013 8:35:45 AM , Rating: 2
Hi Jason.

Gotta agree with everything you said.


RE: Irony Overload
By EricMartello on 8/20/2013 4:41:05 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not the biggest fan of bitcoin but I'm directly opposed to the US government seizing any more power for itself...and it is no more of a "ponzi" scheme than health insurance, social security or pretty much any government program. Judges are not there to make laws or policy, so why is he even talking?

It has been time to take action for a long time already. We're aware of these problems, we talk about it but we don't do anything so the government keeps taking at the peoples' expense...


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki