Death Before Dishonor: Secure Email Services Close to Avoid U.S. Spying
August 9, 2013 11:40 AM
comment(s) - last by
Lavabit and Silent Circle refuse to be "complicit" with government, decides to kill encrypted services
Someday it may be written, "first they came for Lavabit and Silent Circle." A telling sign of the
growing atmosphere of censorship
of the internet by the U.S. federal government arrived this week with the shuttering of these two top encrypted email services.
I. Lavabit Chooses Death Before Dishonor
Lavabit was founded in 2004 and was owned/operated by Ladar Levison. It offered free accounts of 128 megabytes, and paid accounts up to 8 GB. As of July 2013, it had a reported 350,000 customers. Among them -- allegedly --
was Edward Snowden
, the man who leaked secrets of the
U.S. National Surveillance Agency
of millions of Americans
Not long after Edward Snowden's usage of the service was revealed at a July 12 press conference, Lavabit reportedly received either
a national security letter
(NSL) -- a warrantless demand for citizen data -- or a full-blown search/eavesdropping warrant -- both of which are
sealed under gag order
. While unable to talk about the demand publicly, under threat of prosecution, Mr. Levison fought the government for six weeks with internal appeals seeking to protect his customers' privacy.
After reportedly losing that battle he
posted the following message
My Fellow Users,
I have been forced to make a difficult decision: to become complicit in crimes against the American people or walk away from nearly ten years of hard work by shutting down Lavabit. After significant soul searching, I have decided to suspend operations. I wish that I could legally share with you the events that led to my decision. I cannot. I feel you deserve to know what’s going on–the first amendment is supposed to guarantee me the freedom to speak out in situations like this. Unfortunately, Congress has passed laws that say otherwise. As things currently stand, I cannot share my experiences over the last six weeks, even though I have twice made the appropriate requests.
What’s going to happen now? We’ve already started preparing the paperwork needed to continue to fight for the Constitution in the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
[in Richmond, Virg.]. A favorable decision would allow me resurrect Lavabit as an American company.
This experience has taught me one very important lesson: without congressional action or a strong judicial precedent, I would _strongly_ recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States.
Owner and Operator, Lavabit LLC
Defending the constitution is expensive! Help us by donating to the Lavabit Legal Defense Fund
It's important to note here that Mr. Levison is not a privacy absolutist. As
's Kevin Poulsen points out, he
complied with a June 2013 search warrant
of a suspect child pedophile's account. However, he clearly felt there was a vast difference between helping bring to justice a misanthrope who preyed on children and colluding with the U.S. government to help silence criticism of its spying on its citizens.
Some users are angry at Lavabit, complaining on
, Inc. (FB) social network page that they lost their Steam accounts and that the company provided them with no migration route/refund. A supporter of Lavabit blasted these critics, writing:
Holy shit, you guys are crying over your Steam accounts. Just change your email to something else. Lavabit either had to roll over for the government, compromising our privacy, or shut down service. Be happy Ladar shut it down instead of rolling over.
The angry users seemed to outweigh the proponents.
II. Silent Circle is the Second Casualty
Soon after Lavabit's announcement, Silent Circle -- a hot new encrypted email service launched in Oct. 2012 and co-founded by Phil Zimmerman, the creator of the popular Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) encryption program -- announced that it was also proactively closing up shop.
Company CEO Michael Janke
It goes deeper than that. There are some very high profile people on Silent Circle- and I mean very targeted people- as well as heads of state, human rights groups, reporters, special operations units from many countries. We wanted to be proactive because
we knew [the U.S. Government] would come after us
due to the sheer amount of people who use us- let alone the “highly targeted high profile people”. They are completely secure and clean on Silent Phone, Silent Text and Silent Eyes, but email is broken because govt can force us to turn over what we have. So to protect everyone and to drive them to use the other three peer to peer products- we made the decision to do this before men on [SIC] suits show up. Now- they are completely shut down- nothing they can get from us or try and force from us- we literally have nothing anywhere.
These losses may just be the first in a far greater anti-privacy crackdown by the powers that rule the U.S. In recent weeks the NSA and other intelligence agencies have demanded companies like Google Inc. (
turn over master encryption keys
allowing them to access any U.S. citizens private messages without permission.
Jennifer Granick, the Director of Civil Liberties at the
Stanford Center for Internet and Society
(Stanford CIS) at
, says that the U.S. federal government's policing may kill the growing cloud software, services, and hosting industry in the U.S. Already
clients from Europe
, Asia, and the Middle East have started to cancel their contracts and move elsewhere she says. Even some companies in the U.S. are eyeing a move to European cloud hosting, fearing their competitive secrets will be seized by U.S. government spies.
Bush and Obama have over the last 13 years worked to successively increase government spying. [Image Source: NJ Today]
The U.S. government, in its rush to spy on everybody, may end up killing our most productive industry. Lavabit may just be the canary in the coal mine.
She may want to watch that free speech -- top U.S. politicians -- such as
Rep. Peter King
(R- N.Y.) have suggested that academics and reporters who "severely damage national security" by disclosing or criticizing government spying on U.S. citizens
should face criminal charges
The public, though, remains partially apathetic. A recent survey by the non-partisan
Pew Research Center
found that nearly half of Americans were fine with rolling over and meekly surrendering their freedom of privacy, saying they would have
no problem with the government reading their emails
. In fact over half were fine with it if their party of choice was in power, with many only being opposed to it when the other ruling party was in power. More recent polls however, suggest that this may be shifting with over half of Americans saying collecting emails/phone records is wrong and that the NSA may be "going to far", according to
compiled by the
Electronic Frontier Foundation
That said, the vast majority of Americans -- critics or not of surveillance -- continue to either directly or indirectly support the parties that have championed it. In recent elections the majority has chosen to either not vote or continuing to vote for the same two parties that have ballooned the national debt and trampled the Constitution. Still, at least the public is starting to realize that America today might not be in the same free state it was in our parent's times.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Yeah, I'll bet you're ok with it
8/10/2013 10:07:44 AM
Indeed these people usually follow the quote of "you have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide."
(Which is ironically also a quote of Joseph Goebbels, a Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany.)
However, while it indeed doesn't affect most people directly, that hold no political or social weight, it does affect journalists, politicans, company/organization managers, etc. And if the government can track, predict, blackmail/control, defame or even remove these people, then it does affect all of us.
RE: Yeah, I'll bet you're ok with it
8/10/2013 1:56:28 PM
Simply put: the public is either vastly idiotic or it is being misrepresented.
I say it is a combination of both.
RE: Yeah, I'll bet you're ok with it
8/12/2013 8:33:27 AM
I bank more on the misrepresented side. A very effective tactic is to make your opposition feel isolated. It's pretty easy to do if you have the media in your back pocket. You run stories on a few or even tens of people. Run surveys on an undisclosed number of people until you get a couple hundred to a couple thousand that look like they could make up a properly diverse group. Then release the subset of information as if it properly represents a nation of over 300 million. Then nobody thinks it is odd when something gets pushed through despite having >90% opposition. After all, it looked like a close battle to them.
This type of misinformation has been going on all over the world for a long time. However, for some reasons, many Americans seem to think they are special and this doesn't happen to them. CNN releases surveys frequently that include something like 3000 people from a properly diverse group. However, you don't really know how many groups they had to survey before they find this particular one. It's not terribly difficult to find a properly diverse looking group when you only post the results of a survey for one one thousandth of a percent of your nation's population. For each group there are a hundred thousand other equally diverse groups that could have a differing opinion.
RE: Yeah, I'll bet you're ok with it
8/12/2013 4:16:23 PM
Err ... I don't think you understand what a representative sampling means. For example, to get 95% confidence that a given result is
+/- 3% of what the survey predicts, of a population of 250,000,000 (the adult US population, give or take a couple million), you only need a sample size of only a little more than a thousand random people. (This is how people say "People support Proposition Y 56-to-44, +/- 3%.")
If the groups in your last statement are all as equally diverse, the results of any given survey should all be relatively similar to each other. If all the sample groups are (relatively) random, it's mathematically very unlikely to be able to cherry pick a particular sample and use that to twist your data to support your view.
"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet. A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
Report: NSA is Reading Your Email, Chats without Warrant
July 31, 2013, 5:40 PM
Federal Appeals Court Rules Gov't Can Track Your Location Without Warrant
July 31, 2013, 2:47 PM
FBI, NSA Want Master Encryption Keys from Internet Companies
July 25, 2013, 7:06 PM
Source: Don't Worry, NSA Spies on "99 Percent" of Americans' Locations, Call Records
June 14, 2013, 3:57 PM
EU Demands Obama Admin. Come Clean About Spying on EU Citizens
June 13, 2013, 11:53 AM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information