backtop


Print 38 comment(s) - last by unimatrix725.. on Aug 13 at 8:12 PM

Nvidia expects significant declines in Tegra profits for fiscal 2014

NVIDIA recently announced that it is expecting a significant drop in its Tegra chip revenue this year. NVIDIA is predicting that revenue may drop as much as 40% and is laying the blame for that significant drop at Microsoft's feet citing poor Windows RT adoption as the cause.

"We don't expect as much return from the investment as we had hoped," NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang said this week.

Microsoft and NVIDIA worked together closely to ensure that Windows RT would work on the NVIDIA Tegra 3 chips. Lenovo was one the manufacturers that produced a tablet that used NVIDIA's chips, but that tablet, the Yoga 11, was yanked from Lenovo’s online store.

NVIDIA posted revenue for its Tegra line in the last fiscal year of around $750 million. The expectation is for revenue from the chip family in fiscal 2014 to be $200 million to $300 million less than last year.

Despite the fact that revenues are expected to significantly declined for NVIDIA's Tegra line, NVIDIA continues to work with Microsoft on the second-generation Surface tablets. Jen-Hsun Huang says that NVIDIA is working very closely with Microsoft to make Surface 2 a "big success."

If NVIDIA is onboard with Surface RT 2.0, we’re likely to see Tegra 4 as the brains behind the machine.

Sources: Computer World, CNET



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: why
By Mint on 8/9/2013 5:50:41 PM , Rating: 2
Well, only the license cost is MS's fault. The rest is the OEMs trying to get a fatter margin.

The real problem with RT is that it's pointless now that Intel has such low power x86 chips. Why use RT when you can put full Win8 on it?

Have you seen Anand's MacBook Air 11 review? Using the tablet browsing test, Haswell lasts longer with a 38 Wh battery and 11.6" screen than the A6X does with a 42.5 Wh battery and a 9.7" screen!

Granted, Retina needs more power per sq. inch than non-retina, but it's still amazing, and we haven't even seen the ULX and ULY processors yet.

Assuming Intel is serious about the low end, Silvermont makes RT completely pointless unless they want to give it away for free.


RE: why
By othercents on 8/12/2013 8:44:55 AM , Rating: 3
I agree with the OP. Why are NVIDIA's hardware chip sales dependent on one software platform? Shouldn't Android be included in this? Maybe NVIDIA is just making an inferior product to other vendors regardless of what software platform it is using.


RE: why
By Reclaimer77 on 8/12/2013 8:52:53 AM , Rating: 2
Yup.

I was laughed at last year when I opined that Intel would make serious headway in the mobile space sooner rather than later.

But here we are, already.


RE: why
By JPForums on 8/12/2013 9:16:37 AM , Rating: 2
I remember that, though to be fair, I wasn't laughing.
I thought you were spot on, but there was so much anti-Intel/pro-ARM sentiment at the time that nobody would even consider the idea that Intel could achieve competitiveness.

That said, I had hoped Intel would address the graphics situation a little earlier, but C'est la vie.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki