Publishers Don't Agree with DOJ's Consequences for Apple's Ebook Ruling
August 8, 2013 11:25 AM
comment(s) - last by
The publishers say the new restrictions hurt publishers, not Apple
Book publishers aren't happy with the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ)
for Apple as a result of the eBooks ruling.
The five book publishers, which took part in an agency price model with Apple and were targeted in the DOJ investigation as well, said that the new solutions punish the publishers more than they do Apple.
Furthermore, they said that the restrictions on Apple go against the previous settlements between the publishers and the DOJ, where the publishers have already paid $166 million to benefit consumers.
"Despite achieving their stated goal of returning price competition, plaintiffs now seek to improperly impose additional, unwarranted restrictions on the settling defendants, thereby depriving each publisher of the benefit of its bargain with plaintiffs," wrote the publishers.
The publishers -- including Hachette Livre (Lagardère Publishing France), Harper Collins (News Corp., U.S.A.), Simon & Schuster (CBS Corp., U.S.A.), Penguin (Pearson Group, United Kingdom) and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holzbrinck (owner of inter alia Macmillan, Germany) -- filed a motion on Wednesday in U.S. district court in Manhattan. The motion said that the proposals don't place any limitations on Apple's pricing behavior, but instead punishes publishers by preventing them from having agency agreements with Apple.
This all started in April 2012, when the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Apple and the five book publishers
for using an agency pricing model in their agreements. This means that publishers were allowed to set the price of a book and Apple would take a 30 percent cut. In addition, the publishers could not let rivals sell the same book at a lower price.
Last month, Apple -- which was the only company to go to trial regarding eBooks while the book publishers had already settled with the DOJ -- was found guilty of conspiring to raise eBook prices. U.S. District Judge Denise Cote handed down the ruling, saying that consumers and competitors were negatively affected by the arrangement Apple had with the book publishers.
As a result, the DOJ and 33 U.S. states and territories devised
a list of solutions
to punish Apple. These included that Apple be banned from entering anti-competitive e-book distribution contracts for five years; end its business models with the five publishers it conspired with; use an outside monitor to make sure that its antitrust policies are effective, and allow retailers like Amazon and Barnes & Noble to provide links to their options for two years.
A hearing to discuss remedies and hold a trial on damages will take place on August 9.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
8/8/2013 12:49:26 PM
Fixing the damage done by price fixing hurts the price fixers. Who'd have thought?
8/8/2013 1:04:04 PM
Exactly...but, I think they may be coming from the stance that they settled, and by doing this to Apple it punishes them more.
Personally, I'm OK with that as I feel they got off pretty easy. But, I can see why they're upset with the ruling.
8/9/2013 8:57:12 AM
So basically, they want Apple to escape without punishment so Apple can re-enter into Agency agreements and get back to pumping up ebook prices which will benefit their bottom line?
Stupid publishers. They can enter an agreement with some other vendor instead. Finding another Apple sized vendor is their own business problem not the DOJ's.
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
Apple Handed Proposed Solutions for Ebooks Price-Fixing Ruling
August 2, 2013, 2:43 PM
DOJ Could Sue Apple As Soon As Today Over E-Books, Works to Settle With 5 Publishers
April 11, 2012, 9:15 AM
Die Shots Confirm A8 Packs Six PowerVR "Rogue" GPU Clusters
September 22, 2014, 4:05 PM
WSJ: Yes, HTC Nexus 9 ("Babel") is Incoming
September 22, 2014, 4:00 PM
Quick Note: Flagship BlackBerry Passport Smartphone to be Priced at $599 Unsubsidized
September 22, 2014, 3:31 PM
ChipWorks Confirms Apple's iPhone A8 SoC Switch to TSMC
September 22, 2014, 1:41 PM
A Year After It Was First Announced, PlayStation TV Headed to U.S. for $99
September 22, 2014, 11:37 AM
4.7" Samsung Galaxy Alpha to Grace AT&T’s Network Sept. 26 for $199 on Contract
September 22, 2014, 11:16 AM
Most Popular Articles
HTC Preps Nexus 9 With Nvidia K1 64-Bit "Denver" SoC, Android L Onboard
September 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Apple iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus Reviews Roll In
September 16, 2014, 9:13 PM
Big Media: If You Want Privacy, You're Probably a Pirate
September 18, 2014, 2:57 PM
Apple Cripples NFC in iPhone 6, 6+ With Developer Ban
September 17, 2014, 1:00 PM
"Decepticon" Driver Triumphs Over Cops in Massachusetts Court
September 5, 2014, 12:07 PM
Latest Blog Posts
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information