backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by Cheesew1z69.. on Jul 27 at 3:34 PM

It's available in the U.S. starting today, with other countries to follow

Google introduced a media streaming stick today that allows users to watch videos from services like YouTube and Netflix on their TVs. 

The streaming stick is called Chromecast, and it connects to a TV's HDMI input to wirelessly sync with mobile devices or the Chrome browser allowing users to view videos, photos and more right on their TVs.

In other words, if you choose a movie from your smartphone's Netflix app, you can use Chromecast to play it on your TV.

The Google stick performs the duties of a media streaming box and a remote control. Chromecast is compatible with Android and iOS-powered smartphones and tablets, allowing users to not only use these devices to choose the videos they want to watch on their TVs, but also wirelessly control the videos with them (play, pause, stop, rewind, etc.). 

Chromecast is also compatible with the Chrome browser on any PC or Mac. 

A couple of other cool features include screen-mirroring, which will show the user's activity on their Chrome browser including videos and photos, and use of multiple devices to control Chromecast (for instance, if you play a movie from your smartphone's Netflix app, you can use your tablet as a remote control). 


Chromecast will even automatically switch your TV to the correct input upon choosing to watch videos, photos, etc. via Chromecast.

Chromecast's hardware measures a mere 2 inches, and it supports 2.4GHz Wi-Fi 802.11. It can play back 1080p video with 5.1 surround sound, and comes with a USB power cable and a power adapter. 

At launch, Chromecast can only support four apps: Netflix, YouTube, Google Music and Google Movies. However, an upside to this is that Google is offering both new and existing Netflix users three free months of the service if they buy Chromecast. 

Despite its limited app selection, Google said more options will be coming soon. But for now, the tech giant is hoping to use the device's convenient features and low price of only $35 to draw customers in. 

Yes, I said $35. So it doesn't have the options that competitors like Apple TV and Roku's Streaming Stick have, but the attractive price should set sales in motion. 

Chromecast is available starting today in the U.S., and will come to other countries later. 

Google has had a busy week of launches so far. It also unveiled the new Nexus 7 tablet, which features a a quad-core 1.5Ghz Snapdragon S4 Pro processor, a 1920x1200 pixel resolution, a 7-inch 1080p HD screen, a 5-megapixel rear-facing camera, dual stereo speakers, and prices of $229 for 16GB and $269 for 32GB. 

Additionally, Google introduced Android version 4.3 Jelly Bean -- which will power the new Nexus 7 tablet. 

Source: Google Chrome Blog



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I'm confused
By bug77 on 7/25/2013 10:24:39 AM , Rating: 1
Who said I was going to buy one? I was just asking why would I go with a dumb TV (that will disappear in a few years anyway) and a Chromecast, instead of a smart TV.


RE: I'm confused
By Reclaimer77 on 7/25/2013 10:35:39 AM , Rating: 2
Then don't buy it?

Seriously, I don't think Google is claiming this is some all-in-one solution or a fully featured streaming box. Are they?

But for some people and situations, this is pretty damn cool.

And if you think it's going to take a "few years" for 'dumb TV's' to disappear, you're pretty optimistic.


RE: I'm confused
By retrospooty on 7/25/2013 11:11:41 AM , Rating: 3
I know, what is so hard to get about this? It's not for every TV... It's for the millions and millions of TV's out there that dont support wireless video.

For a mere $35, you plug this tiny dongle into any HDMI port and that it, you have wireless streaming from any device, your tablet, your phone, your laptop, whatever.

The other thing is the UI. Its one nice and easy UI that can do it, where your existing UI might suck. For me, I have a Tivo HD. The Tivo's UI is great for TV, but the other options, Netflix, Amazon, etc are absolutely horrible. Even most smart TV's UI's are crappy. I would get this even though I dont need it, because for $35, you cant go wrong. Its not for everyone in every situation, but its a good cheap and easy option for those that can use it.


RE: I'm confused
By Spuke on 7/25/2013 3:43:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
For a mere $35, you plug this tiny dongle into any HDMI port and that it, you have wireless streaming from any device, your tablet, your phone, your laptop, whatever.
BAM! NONE of my TV's are smart. This is a Godsend as far as I'm concerned. And, yes, I'm on the buy list. Too bad I didn't find this out till this morning before they all sold out. Even the wife is impressed.


RE: I'm confused
By bug77 on 7/25/2013 11:15:50 AM , Rating: 2
When I said they'll disappear, I meant from vendor's catalogues. I know people will hold on to their TV a while longer.


RE: I'm confused
By Rukkian on 7/25/2013 11:15:36 AM , Rating: 3
It is your option, but paying ~$300 extra for a "smart" tv, where most of the apps are not updated very often and have a clunky interface instead of $35 for a portable device that should work with any HDMI (practically) TV, does not sound smart.

All of the so called "smart" tvs I have played with have older interfaces, that rarely update and are not as easy to use.


RE: I'm confused
By bug77 on 7/25/2013 12:08:33 PM , Rating: 2
First of all, the difference is not $300. It may not even be $200.
Second, "dumb" TVs are also limited to "100Hz" or so (using the marketing speak where 100Hz can mean a lot of things). Smart TV routinely do 200, 400 or more.
So yes, I got that someone who doesn't have a smart TV could use this, but it doesn't save you nearly as much as you'd think.

Also, the apps on my Samsung seems to be getting a few updates each month. Don't ask me what they do, I don't get a change log. The YouTube application which I use the most has gotten some nice improvements, tho.


RE: I'm confused
By Rukkian on 7/25/2013 12:54:32 PM , Rating: 2
I have a 240HZ LG LED 42", and it was more than $300 more than the equivalent smart LG. I have no need for a smart tv, cause I have a pc next 2 it with an hdmi out, but I am still ordering one of these, cause it is cheaper than adding a bt keyboard and mouse to use from the couch. I also dont have to pay the extra price if/when I change out my tv again.

While it may not be for everybody, I was responding to those that say there is absolutely no need for this and will be replaced by smart tv's.


RE: I'm confused
By Moishe on 7/26/2013 2:22:07 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly.... the control mechanism, portability, and price make this a no-brainer.


RE: I'm confused
By XZerg on 7/25/2013 12:57:53 PM , Rating: 2
your argument is invalid! there, happy?

this merely serves as an option for those who have tvs that do not provide features this device does or want some device that they can control via their ios/andriod devices.

heck i wonder if i can connect this to my monitor and watch movies off of it. imagine that.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki