backtop


Print 6 comment(s) - last by jeepga.. on Jul 15 at 5:41 PM


Not anymore  (Source: businessinsider.com)
The co-owners have decided to hold onto Hulu and fund its growth

Hulu's co-owners have taken the "for sale" sign off of the video streaming service and decided to pour more money into it instead. 

NBCUniversal, 21st Century Fox and The Walt Disney Company -- which co-own Hulu -- have decided not to sell Hulu afterall. Instead, they're putting $750 million USD in cash into the service to help it grow.

"We believe the best path forward for Hulu is a meaningful recapitalization that will further accelerate its growth under the current ownership structure," said Chase Carey, President and Chief Operating Officer of 21st Century Fox. "We had meaningful conversations with a number of potential partners and buyers, each with impressive plans and offers to match, but with 21st Century Fox and Disney fully aligned in our collective vision and goals for the business, we decided to continue to empower the Hulu team, in this fashion, to continue the incredible momentum they've built over the last few years."

Hulu, which was founded in March 2007, has been attracting bidders such as Yahoo, Time Warner Cable and DirecTV ever since the sale was announced. In May of this year, some sources valued Hulu at $2 billion USD. 

However, selling Hulu wasn't easy because it only had short-term contracts with content providers, meaning the buyer would have to work to renew these contracts or find other sources of content -- and this does not come cheap. 

Hulu has some tough competition out there, such as Netflix and Amazon. The two have similar subscription-based models and have deep pockets to continue offering premium content at fairly low prices ($8 per month for Netflix or $79 per year with Amazon). But Hulu and its premium service Hulu Plus has a good following, and with the new $750 million in cash, Hulu has a good chance of sticking around as one of the big boys in the video streaming world. 

Source: Market Watch



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Willing to pay providing
By Mitch101 on 7/15/2013 11:13:01 AM , Rating: 4
Im willing to pay to watch Hulu however I don't want commercials if I'm paying. Commercials should be reserved for free streaming. Double dipping on paying customers is Hulu's downfall.




RE: Willing to pay providing
By kmmatney on 7/15/2013 11:53:14 AM , Rating: 2
What Hulu really needs is more channels. It's getting better, but I still can't cut the cord from satellite yet.


RE: Willing to pay providing
By Reclaimer77 on 7/15/2013 12:49:27 PM , Rating: 3
All I see on Hulu is the same crap that's currently on TV anyway. Maybe a few sitcoms others find funny like Friends or whatever, but seriously; why bother? Commercials, less content, no original programming like House Of Cards, and it costs more than Netflix.

It doesn't take a genius to see why its struggling.


RE: Willing to pay providing
By FITCamaro on 7/15/2013 12:36:30 PM , Rating: 2
I'm willing to pay and have commercials for even up to $20/month. Still way less than cable. Hulu still has fewer commercials too.

Content isn't cheap.


RE: Willing to pay providing
By tayb on 7/15/2013 12:36:32 PM , Rating: 2
I agree.

I will gladly pay for content so long as it does not have commercials.

or

I will gladly accept commercials if the content is free.

I think Hulu is a decent value but I'm still not going to sign up for the service because I refuse to watch commercials.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Related Articles
Hulu in Talks with Buyers
March 26, 2013, 1:25 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki