backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by half_duplex.. on Jul 8 at 11:59 AM


  (Source: i1-news.softpedia-static.com)
There will be an inquiry into how Ireland uses the "global tax architecture," but the questioning will no longer require the presence of company executives

Apple and Google are off the hook when it comes to an investigation into how they use the Irish tax system

Apple, Google and other multinational companies were originally called to talk about their tax setups in Ireland; as such arrangements had come under fire recently. The companies were accused of dodging taxes in other countries by a special route through Ireland. 

However, Ciaran Lynch, chairman of the Irish parliament's finance committee, has cleared company executives from Apple and Google from having to explain their tax situations with Ireland. According to Lynch, there's no need for Ireland to have a tax investigation when the U.S.'s Senate subcommittee and the UK's public accounts committee are doing the same already. 

"If there has been suggestions that companies have been 'off side' on tax, then the right people to go are those who make the rules," said Lynch. "You don't go to Manchester United or Chelsea when they're accused of being offside – you go to the referee, or to Fifa or Uefa."

Lynch will, however, have an inquiry into how Ireland uses the "global tax architecture," but the questioning will no longer require the presence of company executives. 

In April 2012, The New York Times accused Apple of dodging millions of dollars in taxes in California and 20 other U.S. states (and dodging billions of dollars in taxes worldwide) by routing its money through other locations. Even though Apple is based in Cupertino, California, it put an office in Reno, Nevada which allows Apple to escape California's 8.84 percent tax rate for Nevada's 0 percent. Apple has also sold digital content from low-tax countries anywhere around the world, and has used the "Double Irish With a Dutch Sandwich," which allows Apple to cut taxes by directing profits through low-cost Irish subsidiaries, the Netherlands and the Caribbean.

In May of this year, Apple CEO Tim Cook was called to appear before Congress to offer tax proposals. More specifically, he presented proposals that discuss companies bringing back foreign earnings to the United States. Furthermore, he suggested that this money be invested in research and development and creating jobs in the U.S. 

Apple had come under fire for dodging heavy tax payments by profit shifting. For example, Apple made an estimated £6B ($9.50B USD) in Britain last year, but paid only £10M ($15.8M USD) in taxes.  It was able to do this because of the British tax code's rule that largely exempts companies based in Ireland from paying British taxes.

Source: The Guardian



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By maugrimtr on 7/8/2013 10:35:49 AM , Rating: 2
The way it works now in Ireland is that the law excludes companies registered in Ireland but which are actually managed from another state, i.e. Apple. So Irish Law views Apple's Irish subsidiary as exempt. It's not managed in Ireland so why tax its overseas profits that weren't even earned in Ireland? US Law views the same subsidiary as exempt because there's no profit repatriation. Britain views the same subsidiary exempt because it's an "Irish company".

Who's wrong? All the fingers are pointing at Ireland instead of looking closer to home. Irish Law basically assumes the US and Europe will tax profits made in their own backyard. I'm sure the Irish wish they could levy 12.5% on billions of overseas non-Irish income. They have a bit of a deficit to cover! :P


"It looks like the iPhone 4 might be their Vista, and I'm okay with that." -- Microsoft COO Kevin Turner














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki