World's Largest Offshore Wind Farm -- 630 MW, 175 Turbines -- Turns on in the UK
July 4, 2013 9:51 PM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: Siemens AG)
Project cost $2.84B USD, exploits natural abundance of marine winds
Britain's miles of coasts are home to some of the world's most active marine winds, making them a prime place for offshore wind power. The nation this week announced the opening of the world's largest marine wind farm installation, a monstrous 630 Megawatt, 175-turbine design dubbed "
the London Array
I. London Array is Turned On
The new farm is the latest bump for the UK, which has more installed offshore wind capacity than any other nation in the world. The UK currently gets 12 percent of its energy from renewable energy, but it hopes to expand that to 30 percent by 2020. New offshore wind installations are critical to that goal.
The new farm is located along the coastal border of Kent and Essex, to the northeast of London, facing the North Sea. It uses Siemens AG's (
[PDF] (3.6 MW), which has three blades and a diameter of 117 meters. The turbines are installed 20 kilometers (~12.4 miles) off the coast.
Here's some videos of the plans and construction of the farm and supporting substation.
The groups have petitioned to expand the installation to 870 MW, adding another 66 turbines to the current count.
II. Green Profit, But Energy Firms are Hungry for More
The new installation is a joint venture owned by Germany's E.ON SE (
) (30% stake), United Arab Emirates' state-owned Masdar Abu Dhabi Future Energy Comp. (20% stake) and Danish state-owned Dong Energy A/S (50% stake). It cost a whopping €2.2B ($2.84B USD) to build, but is expected to power a half million homes for at least 30 years.
Its total annual generation is estimated by the developers to be 2.1 terawatt-hours (tWh) per year, but perhaps a more realistic metric would be 1.65 tWh, if you take the average capacity factor (29.6 percent) of UK offshore wind farms last year.
UK energy costs around 15 pence ($0.23 USD) per kWh [
], so this works out to somewhere between $379.5-483M USD in revenue per year, or roughly $11.4-14.5B USD in revenue over a 30-year lifespan. However, Prime Minister David Cameron recently announced that the government would mandate incentives to drive the revenue per kWh to three times the base rate, which would be mean over $1B USD in revenue per year.
UK companies want longer term guarantees on gov't renewable energy financing commitments.
[Image Source: Siemens]
The UK has 3.3 GW worth of installed offshore wind capacity. EON estimates the new farm will save 900,000 tons of carbon emissions per year.
While it appears to be a booming era for UK offshore wind, the manufacturers and energy companies are a bit disgruntled at the lack of longer term guarantees from the UK central government. They wanted plans to run through 2030, but only got targets for 2020.
, "[David Cameron's administration] needs to give the sector long-term certainty by agreeing to cut carbon completely from our electricity sector."
London Array [press release]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
7/5/2013 5:42:37 AM
It is not so much Thorium rather than Uranium, it is Molten Salt Reactor technology that is the Silver Bullet. LFTR (i.e. a breeder) is very compelling, but running with denatured uranium (i.e. a burner) is also very efficient and much simpler. Using DMSRs (Denatured Molten Salt Reactors) we could generate 2500GW of electricity (i.e. the world's present electrical generation) without any increase in uranium mining (about 60-65,000 tonnes), and in the process, eliminate the mining of 7 BILLION tonnes of coal. That's 2500GW with DMSRs versus the 400GW presently generated by uranium. And because MSRs are so much more efficient than LWRs (Light Water Reactors) they can withstand huge increases in the price of uranium. And if the price rises then massive amounts of, what is presently uneconomical, ore, would become available. The first MSRs will be running in about 10years time and then the joke that is wind and solar, and LWRs I might add, will be glaringly apparent. Whether LTFRs then go on to dominate, or simply uranium, is less important than the liquid fueled reactor technology itself.
7/5/2013 4:24:06 PM
I see you've been following the work of Dr. David LeBlanc!
He certainly makes a fabulous case for the DMSR. I really love how he found the perfect application - steam heating for the oils sands industry - to work on a barebones DMSR before going into electricity production.
7/6/2013 3:20:38 AM
yeah, I follow his work closely
"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information