Print 68 comment(s) - last by wolfchen.. on Jul 16 at 2:36 PM

  (Source: Oxford Press)
Data from over 3 million users helped build picture of local brainpower

San Francisco-based indie edutainment internet software company Lumosity has a bonafide hit, with its cognitive training app.  Consisting of over 40 games, the online portal is supposed to boost your memory and problem solving skills, similar to Nintendo Comp., Ltd.'s (TYO:7974) Brain Age for the Nintendo DS.

With over 3 million users, the site decided to offer up an interesting data mining analysis, determining which cities in America have the "smartest" citizens (as assessed by puzzle solving and memory skills).

It appears that Iowa and Indiana are among the most mentally endowed states.  More specifically, the top 10 cities are:
  1. Ithaca, N.Y.
  2. State College, Penn.
  3. Lafayette-West Lafayette, Ind.
  4. Iowa City, Iowa
  5. Ames, Iowa
  6. Ann Arbor, Mich.
  7. Bloomington, Ind.
  8. Madison, Wisc.
  9. Lawrence, Kans.
  10. Pullman, Wash.
Seattle (90) and San Francisco (114) both scored relatively well.

Washington D.C. (154), Portland (155) and Chicago (188) scored in the middle.

Red = not so smart; Green = smart [click to enlarge] [Image Source: Lumosity]

In the worst category, Texas and North Carolina get hit particularly hard.  The lowest ranking cities include:
  1. Wilson, N.C.
  2. El Paso, Tex.
  3. Talladega-Sylacauga, Alab.
  4. Albany, Geor.
  5. Brownsville-Harlingen, Tex.
  6. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, Flor.
  7. El Centro, Calif.
  8. Kinston, N.C.
  9. Laredo, Tex.
  10. Lumberton, N.C.
Los Angeles (309) and New York City (382) (which was lumped with Newark/Jersey City) were among the worst scoring large cities.

Lumosity has an interactive map of its results here, and a full white paper on the study here [PDF].

Sources: Lumosity [map], [white paper; PDF]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Red states are um.. red
By KPOM1 on 7/2/2013 10:40:16 PM , Rating: 2
Seems to align perfectly with conservative politics.

Yes, LA and NYC are known Tea Party hotspots.

Los Angeles (309) and New York City (382) (which was lumped with Newark/Jersey City) were among the worst scoring large cities.

RE: Red states are um.. red
By gamerk2 on 7/3/2013 3:09:48 AM , Rating: 2
Outliers exist. Note the blob of red in the South-East though.

RE: Red states are um.. red
By Solandri on 7/3/2013 4:19:56 AM , Rating: 3
When the two biggest population centers in the country don't match the hypothesis, they are not outliers. They're a pretty strong indication the hypothesis is wrong. Remember, the hypothesis is based on people, not cities. So having some remote village of 150 people in Alaska not fit the hypothesis is not too far-fetched, and thus a likely outlier. But having two cities representing 1/25th the entire country's population not fit is statistically nearly impossible.

The data, while interesting, suffers from two statistical problems. (1) It's a self-selected sample, not a random sample. (2) It's arbitrarily grouped by city/county - things that have nothing to do with intellect (or some abstracted measure of it). That makes it susceptible to Simpson's paradox (google it) - arbitrarily grouping data can create trends contradictory to what's really going on.

An example of (1) is that Texas specifically and southern states in general have higher SAT scores for hispanics than the rest of the country. The reason turns out to be that a smaller percentage of hispanics tend to take the SAT in these states, and those that do tend to be the top students. That means the statistic is a measure specific only to hispanic SAT-takers, rather than a measure of hispanic students in general.

An example of (2) is that Red states tend to be net recipients of federal funds, while Blue states tend to be net federal tax contributors. This despite the fact that Republicans on average have higher incomes and thus tend to be tax contributors, while Democrats tend to have lower incomes and thus tend to be government spending recipients. The reason turns out to be the arbitrary grouping of the population into states. Basically, the wealthiest Republicans tend to live in or near urban areas. Those urban areas tend to vote Democrat thus making the state Blue. So the arbitrary grouping into states means tax contributions by individual wealthy Republicans get incorrectly attributed to Democrats simply because they happen to live in a state which votes Democrat.

RE: Red states are um.. red
By JediJeb on 7/3/2013 1:56:49 PM , Rating: 2
This discrepancy is also shown in the fact that the democrats carried most of those large cities yet the last presidential election was just about even on votes cast for each party nation wide.

RE: Red states are um.. red
By Donkey2008 on 7/4/2013 3:36:08 PM , Rating: 1
You would be really surprised at how many conservative Republicans live in the Southern California area. It is just unfortunate that a lot of the American population believes everything they hear on Fox News or conservative radio. Say something like "socially liberal, fiscally conservative" and it totally blows their minds.

RE: Red states are um.. red
By powerwerds on 7/9/2013 4:46:23 PM , Rating: 2
I too am waiting for the political representation of these two ideals. I am from the south. On the one side my dad runs a family business and is typical southern Republican. My siblings and I are college educated and have all arrived at world-views individually different from our parents. The running of a business coupled with a dire observance of a large population of tax revenue negative peoples that can only be most positively termed as parasites, lends me a strong reverie of fiscally conservative policies. On the other hand my brother has a boyfriend, and I feel very passionate about a couples/ woman's right to abort. I obviously do not support other socially liberal policies that by their nature oppose fiscal conservatism.

I find the data interesting, but not surprising. Do they have data by country? Also, I believe the progression of our societies can only humbly be described by our lowest common denominator and so to really truly advance we need to bring the bottom up.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home
Related Articles
Lumosity: Does it Work?
May 22, 2013, 8:20 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki