Print 18 comment(s) - last by wushuktl.. on Jul 2 at 7:45 AM

A hundred manufacturers and technology-makers will field products

Texas A&M Univ.'s Central Texas branch announced this week a pretty clever way to save on its power costs -- turn nearby unused acreage into the world's largest solar test farm, dubbed the "Center For Solar Energy".

(Note: There are many bigger commercial farms, but Texas A&M is billing this as the biggest farm purely for solar prototyping/R&D.)

Announced by Texas A&M System Chancellor John Sharp and A&M-Central Texas President Marc Nigliazzo, the new farm will be far different from commercial farms, fielding hundreds of solar cell designs from dozens of manufacturers.  Mr. Sharp said he hopes to have over 100 manufacturers and solar technology players onboard for the project, which he thinks could draw in $400-500B USD in research over a five- to six-year span.

Why does the university claim that much investment will be inbound?  It's confident that by making itself the nucleus of all things solar, it will become the favored prooving ground for all manner of technologies that produce power from sunlight from traditional photovoltaics to more novel designs like stirling engines.  It says that a product that would take six years to develop elsewhere should be able to be fully tested in only two years, thanks to this concentration of expertise.

Marc Nigliazzo
Texas A&M-Central Texas President Marc Nigliazz [Image Source: KD Herald]

The farm will be situated on 800 acres in Bell County, and is expected to produce 50 MW.  That's enough to provide 100 percent of the university's power (with grid storage smoothing periods of low production), plus enough juice for 20,000 nearby homes.  The installation will also provide electricity to the nearby Fort Hood military installation, the largest active-duty armored post in the U.S. Armed Services.  Fort Hood officials were on hand at the project kickoff.

A&M Chancellor Sharp brags, "Obama has charged military installations to use 30 to 40 percent of renewable energy on their bases.  With this [center], Fort Hood thinks it will be the first post to achieve that."

The project will cost $600M USD, but most of the costs will be absorbed by venture capitalists, eager to profit off the technologies tested and developed at the site.  As a result, the university says it does not expect to "expend any capital on the project", and in fact expects to save "$250,000 in its first year of center operation."

Center director
Center director Bruce Mercy explains the planned installation. [Image Source: KD Herald]

Students at the university will also gain new options -- "physics and business degrees with an emphasis in renewable energy; and advanced degrees in those same disciplines" will be offered.

So far the primary private-sector collaborator is California-based PPA Partners, LLC, a renewable energy consulting firm.

Sources: Texas A&M [press release], KD Herald, The Eagle

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Solar in Texas is common sense
By m51 on 6/30/2013 10:07:28 AM , Rating: 2
None of these alternative energy sources are competitive with current natural gas. Although there may be special small cases like this one, the vast majority of the power market isn't going away.

Fresh water is not required for natural gas turbine power plants. You can get some efficiency improvement with wet cooling over dry cooling but it's not required.

RE: Solar in Texas is common sense
By Shig on 6/30/2013 1:52:59 PM , Rating: 2
That's simply wrong. It is true that in general natural gas is cheaper in a larger number of regions, but the number of regions where renewables are better is growing every quarter, and it's growing quickly.

This is what solar expansion in Germany looked like. Watch how it grows, because that is currently happening in southern California and Arizona.

By Solandri on 7/1/2013 6:53:52 AM , Rating: 2
Solar's capacity factor in Germany absolutely sucks. It's less than 0.1. That is, if you have 500 MW of solar panels installed, on average they will produce less than 50 MW. By comparison, the average for solar in the U.S. is about 0.145, and up to 0.185 in the desert southwest. Onshore wind's capacity factor is about 0.2-0.25, offshore wind about 0.3-0.4, hydro about 0.4, coal 0.6-0.7, and nuclear 0.9. If you want to compare installation sizes for different power plants, you need to divide by this capacity factor. e.g. If Germany shuts down a 1 GW nuclear reactor hoping to replace it with solar, they'd have to install 9 GW of solar to generate the same amount of electricity.

Except in specialized (off-grid) applications, solar in Germany is just plain. The only reason Germany is using solar is because of politics. Their attempt to block nuclear while expanding renewables has cause them to burn more coal to take up the slack, resulting in an increase in greenhouse gas emissions.

On a cost per kWh generated over the lifetime of the plant, solar is currently about 2-4x more expensive than the alternatives. Wind is about the same as to 1.5x more expensive. So yes there are places where wind makes sense. There are almost no places where solar makes sense, even in the desert. About the only place it's cost-effective is in off-grid applications, and remote areas where electricity is very expensive. e.g. some of the smaller Hawaiian islands where it can be over $0.40 per kWh, vs a national average of $0.12 per kWh. (For comparison, electricity in Germany is around $0.32 per kWh, largely due to the renewable initiatives.)

That said, it sounds like what Texas A&M is trying to do here is attract $600 million in R&D funding for solar. They're not trying to build a commercially viable $600M PV solar farm, they're trying to attract research into solar technology. I don't see any problem with that.

"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki