Print 32 comment(s) - last by superstition.. on Jul 3 at 11:43 AM

The precursor to photosynthesis may lie in manganese oxidation

Researchers have solid evidence indicating that massive blooms of photosynthesizing algae in the primordial ocean used the power of the sun to "split" (oxidize) water, releasing its oxygen atoms as diatomic atmospheric oxygen gas, while merging the hydrogen with carbon dioxide to build up sugars -- life's primary form of chemical energy storage.

I. What Came Before Modern Photosynthesis?

Researchers even have a good idea of where algae got their photosynthesis genes.  Describes geobiology Professor Woodward Fischer of the California Institute of Technology (CalTech), "Water-oxidizing or water-splitting photosynthesis was invented by cyanobacteria approximately 2.4 billion years ago and then borrowed by other groups of organisms thereafter.  Algae borrowed this photosynthetic system from cyanobacteria, and plants are just a group of algae that took photosynthesis on land, so we think with this finding we're looking at the inception of the molecular machinery that would give rise to oxygen."

Cyanobacteria is a hardy phylum of bacteria (better known as "blue-green algae", a misleading name as it's not an algae at all) that's found in every continent.  Some exobiologists even believe they may be descended from extraplanetary microorganisms that arrived aboard meteors hitting early Earth.  Having survived billions of years, the cyanobacteria of today have photosynthetic systems similar to plants and true algae.  But researchers believe it wasn't always that way -- there must have been an intermediate reaction that allowed the tiny sugar-factories to evolve towards full-blown synthesis. 

Green Forest
Researchers have been hunting for the precursor to nature's primary modern energy storing process -- photosynthesis. [Image Source: Take Pride in Utah]

Professor Fischer and others have long hunted for this stepping stone which is thought to have preceded full-blown photosynthesis.  Now he believes there may be an answer.

Maganese, a key component in photosynthesis involved in electron transfer, can also undergo alternative oxidation reactions (similar to the splitting of water) that transfer electrons to the manganese, changing its state without the presence of free oxygen.  This reaction could drive the formation of energy-storing biomolecules.  Prof. Fischer's graduate student Jena Johnson ponders, "Manganese plays an essential role in modern biological water splitting as a necessary catalyst in the process, so manganese-oxidizing photosynthesis makes sense as a potential transitional photosystem."

II. Manganese -- Can You Dig It?

But the researchers need evidence to support their hypothesis -- they need to document chemical and geological evidence of manganese oxidation being performed organically before traditional photosynthesis.  The perfect place to look was in magnesium rich sediments deposited before the evolution of traditional photosynthesis.

Manganese is naturally soluble in seawater, with electrons in tow.  But when exposed to strong oxidative agents (such as oxidative enzymes in a cyanobacteria), the manganese forms oxidated compounds which are insoluble and precipitate as solids, falling to the sea floor.

In an example of perfect timing the Agouron Institute (AGI) has just obtained drill cores of 2.415 billion-year-old South African marine sedimentary rocks.  To the excitement of the CalTech team, these rocks showed a high concentration of manganese.  Prof. Fisher comments, "Just the observation of these large enrichments -- 16 percent manganese in some samples -- provided a strong implication that the manganese had been oxidized, but this required confirmation."

Jena Johnson
Grad student Jena E. Johnson inspects an ancient African manganese-rich rock deposit.
[Image Source: CalTech]

The key question was first whether the manganese was truly oxidized and secondly when it arrived there.  If it was truly dropped off 2.415 bya (billion years ago), then that would provide strong evidence of an organic origin and the researchers' hypothesis of how pre-photosynthetic bacteria formed oxygen.  But ocean currents could easily have deposited the manganese at a later date, invalidating the deposits as solid evidence.  

Thus the team had to examine the cores at a micron scale.  To do that they developed new X-ray based techniques to examine the abundance of and oxidation states of manganese at a scale as small as 2 microns (2e-6 m, or 2000 nanometers).

Describes Prof. Fischer, "It's warranted -- these rocks are complicated at a micron scale!  And yet, the rocks occupy hundreds of meters of stratigraphy across hundreds of square kilometers of ocean basin, so you need to be able to work between many scales -- very detailed ones, but also across the whole deposit to understand the ancient environmental processes at work."

The method was developed in collaboration with Stanford University's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.  SLAC professor Samuel Webb describes, "It's really amazing to be able to use X-ray techniques to look back into the rock record and use the chemical observations on the microscale to shed light on some of the fundamental processes and mechanisms that occurred billions of years ago.  Questions regarding the evolution of the photosynthetic pathway and the subsequent rise of oxygen in the atmosphere are critical for understanding not only the history of our own planet, but also the basics of how biology has perfected the process of photosynthesis."

The researchers next verified that the manganese was oxidized via an electron transfer and did not have attached oxygens.  This was confirmed.

Together the evidence shows that something was widely oxidizing manganese across the ancient ocean, using a process that predated the oxygen-creating modern photosynthetic pathway.  Where modern photosynthesis uses manganese to feed electrons on down a chain of reactions to drive water splitting, this earlier pathway stopped before these reactions, using the oxidation of manganese to directly drive processes, according to the supported hypothesis.

III.  Can Researchers Recreate Ancient Bacteria?

Much work remains, though, in formulating what kinds of organic reactions the manganese oxidation may have directly driven.  Comments Prof. Fisher:

I think that there will be a number of additional experiments that people will now attempt to try and reverse engineer a manganese photosynthetic photosystem or cell. 

Once you know that this happened, it all of a sudden gives you reason to take more seriously an experimental program aimed at asking, 'Can we make a photosystem that's able to oxidize manganese but doesn't then go on to split water? How does it behave, and what is its chemistry?'

Even though we know what modern water splitting is and what it looks like, we still don't know exactly how it works. There is a still a major discovery to be made to find out exactly how the catalysis works, and now knowing where this machinery comes from may open new perspectives into its function -- an understanding that could help target technologies for energy production from artificial photosynthesis.

The team is moving on to a pair of new works to further support the hypothesis.  The first involves examining similar core samples from ancient Australian deposits.  If the samples show manganese, this would provide further evidence that manganese oxidizing pre-photosynthetic bacteria had spread around the globe.

Second, the team is looking to mutate a cyanobacteria to "go back", ditching the final pathways of photosynthesis to directly drive its biochemical pathways.

If the team can provide further evidence they could prove that bacteria first learned evolved a chain of enzymes to use sunlight to drive oxidation of manganese, before eventually acquiring more enzymes that allowed the splitting of water, improving the efficiency of the process, while allowing for the creation of an oxygen atmosphere and the high-density energy storage needed for multicellular life.

Researchers are working to "turn back the clock", engineering cyanobacteria that use manganese oxidation instead of water-splitting photosynthesis. [Image Source:]

Currently the team has published the work on their hypotheses and inspection of the African rock samples in a paper [abstract] in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal PNAS.  The work was funded by the Agouron Institute, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA)'s Exobiology Branch, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship program.

Other authors on the work include CalTech geology professor Joseph Kirschvink, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) geochemistry Professor Shuhei Ono and Ph.D alumni Katherine Thomas.

Sources: CalTech [press release], PNAS [abstract]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By navair2 on 6/27/2013 10:52:13 PM , Rating: 0
Once again, "science" is left to best guesses. God knows how it actually happened, because He did it.

By MechanicalTechie on 6/28/2013 1:38:35 AM , Rating: 4
There more evidence in the flying spaghetti monster than your maded up "i'm-so-scared-i-need-to-believe-in-a-fairy-story" God.

Do us all a favour and keep your Godsquad crap to yourself

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By Reclaimer77 on 6/28/2013 2:21:13 AM , Rating: 4
I like how he put science in quotes, as if it's something we just invented to cover up the biblical "truth" lol.

I don't bash religious people just for being religious. But this guy is just asking for it with an OP like that!

By Belard on 6/28/2013 3:24:45 AM , Rating: 2
No... It's called trashing religious people for being stupid.

religion is what it is, facts don't matter.

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By BRB29 on 6/28/2013 8:23:00 AM , Rating: 2
There more evidence in the flying spaghetti monster than your maded up "i'm-so-scared-i-need-to-believe-in-a-fairy-story" God.

They read a science article that provides evidence to a theory and trash it. But they'll believe everything in the bible that proves everything through vague stories. With so many versions of the bible and so many different splits of the same original religion, I don't even know why people put so much faith in it.

If there was one religion I want to bash it's gotta be the Catholic church. I swear every time I attend their service, all they want is my money or I'm going to hell. If I don't believe everything and anything is created by God and praise the lord to be absolute then it's blasphemy and I'm once again going to hell.

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By JKflipflop98 on 6/29/2013 11:44:32 AM , Rating: 2
But he loves you unconditionally. Right before sending you to hell for getting a tattoo.

By Rukkian on 7/1/2013 2:03:06 PM , Rating: 2
Or using a condom!

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By Gondor on 6/28/2013 5:17:32 AM , Rating: 1
Once again, "science" is left to best guesses. God knows how it actually happened, because He did it.

Indeed I do. It was manganese all along, Jenna Jameson is right.

By delphinus100 on 6/28/2013 9:34:52 PM , Rating: 2
So, 'Gondor' is your real name, your allness...?

That alone is gonna surprise a lot of people.

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By retrospooty on 6/28/2013 6:45:01 AM , Rating: 2
"Once again, "science" is left to best guesses. God knows how it actually happened, because He did it."

Christians... The new pagans.

Not that all Christians are ignorant enough to deny the mountains of evidence that prove we evolved over 4.5 billion years on Earth , that is just for the uneducated ignorant ones that are.

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By ShieTar on 6/28/2013 7:39:49 AM , Rating: 3
Well, most Christians also refuse to stone to death every atheists and homosexual they meet, even though their God has ordered them to do so. And most Christians would rather see a shrink than kill their own child if they start to hear a voice order them to do it. Also most Catholics will happily lend money for interest, even though that has been declared as a sin by the pope.

In the end, only uneducated ignorant (or crazy) people can be truly religious, everybody else just refuses to admit that they are actually atheist because they enjoy the social and cultural aspects of the religion they grew up with.

By superstition on 7/3/2013 11:43:12 AM , Rating: 2
Not to quibble, but the word homosexual didn't even exist when the biblical documents were written. Or, if it did, it wasn't written down. Contemporary translations/interpretations use words like that because Bibles that bash gays sell more copies.

Moreover, some translators say that the prohibition on male-male sex in Leviticus merely prohibits having sex with another man in a woman's bed. That and other passages is highly contested.

It is simply not factually true that Christianity requires heterosexism. In fact, some argue that Jesus and his disciples would have been looked at as if they're a group of men who slept together.

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By drycrust3 on 6/28/13, Rating: -1
RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By DesertCat on 6/28/2013 8:31:47 AM , Rating: 5
Actually scientists do have an answer why you can have c14 in petroleum. Petroleum is full of regular carbon. In the ground it is stored in a reservoir rock, like sandstone, which frequently contains small quantities of uranium. During the uranium radioactive decay process, tiny amounts of C14 may be generated from the regular C12 being bombarded. The amount of C14 generated in this way is tiny, which is why any dating attempts will generate an age of 50,000+ years (near the limits of C14 dating). The important thing to remember, however, is that C14 dating is only useful for materials that received their C14 from Earth's atmosphere (e.g. plants respirating). Since the oil's C14 is not from this source, using C14 as a dating technique is entirely inappropriate for petroleum.

With regards to other comments, it's amusing that one of the early posters says that there is no evidence when the article cites plenty of evidence. Evidence and unequivocal proof are not the same thing.

By BRB29 on 6/28/2013 10:54:51 AM , Rating: 2
Did you know that oil has Carbon 14 in it? Probably not, it isn't one of those facts Evolutionists proclaim loudly, but there it is, a fact that they don't have an answer to. The reason Carbon 14 is in oil is simple: the oil is less than 65000 years old, it isn't millions of years old. Did you know that there were at least 10 times as many animal and plant species prior to the Noah's Ark flood than exist now? No, probably not, and again the reason is simply because those that believe in Evolution don't like to tell you the truth.

are you kidding me? science shows repeatable results. Bibles have repeatable stories that are actually not repeatable because there's so many versions of it.

Doesn't christians believe that god created the earth and people 7000 years ago? Why are you even quoting 65k years for c14. Do you just quote science whenever convenient and the bible whenever you can't explain something?

By retrospooty on 6/28/2013 11:10:58 AM , Rating: 2
"Did you know that there were at least 10 times as many animal and plant species prior to the Noah's Ark flood than exist now"

more like 10000x. That evolved and dies out. Get an education and get back to me.

"Did you know that oil has Carbon 14 in it? Probably not, it isn't one of those facts Evolutionists proclaim loudly, but there it is, a fact that they don't have an answer to. The reason Carbon 14 is in oil is simple: the oil is less than 65000 years old, it isn't millions of years old."

Becasue YOU dont understand the science, doesnt mean everyone else doesnt.

By Skywalker123 on 6/28/2013 1:24:52 PM , Rating: 2
Did you know that there were at least 10 times as many animal and plant species prior to the Noah's Ark flood than exist now? No, probably not, and again the reason is simply because those that believe in Evolution don't like to tell you the truth.

Thats not possible , Noah saved all the animals

RE: No "evidence" to see here...move along.
By DukeN on 6/28/2013 9:34:55 AM , Rating: 1
Actually, my great-great-great-great grandfather ate a magic piece of dinosaur turd and the resulting fart gave the earth it's atmosphere 6000 years ago.

By mead drinker on 6/28/2013 9:56:56 AM , Rating: 1
Who would've thought, that the genetic pre-disposition to eat shit would last this long?

By ClownPuncher on 6/28/2013 2:37:15 PM , Rating: 1
Don't the details of the process fascinate you, pique your curiosity? You can't be satisfied with "It is because it is", can you? Whether creation is true or not, you should have some desire to know HOW.

By guffwd13 on 6/28/2013 3:39:25 PM , Rating: 1
Once again, "science" is left to best guesses. God knows how it actually happened, because He did it.

I love the irony primordially oozing from that statement. Thanks! Made my day...

"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki