Print 20 comment(s) - last by Wolfpup.. on Jun 26 at 7:34 PM

  (Source: Michael Rafter)
Book seller will look to partner with third parties for branded color tablets, to avoid soaring losses

Between fiscal Q4 2012 and fiscal Q4 2013 (calendar Q1 2013), Barnes & Noble, Inc. (BKS) took a financial beating thanks to soaring losses from its tablet unit.  

The book seller's retailer wing dipped slightly from last year, down to a profit (EBITDA) of $51M USD, versus $67M USD from a year before.  The new college textbook unit chipped in an additonal $4M USD.

I. Licensing, E-Book Slump, Cost-Cutting Drive NOOK HD/HD+ to Massive Losses

But the tablet unit lost $177M USD in Q4 2013 -- $100M USD more than it did last year.  That plunged the otherwise profitable company to a net loss.  Revenue for the tablet unit plunged to $108M USD from $164M USD last year.

E-INK readers have been a double-edged sword for Barnes & Noble.  While, Inc. (AMZN) showed the market that e-books are a ticket to higher profits, B&N's Nook -- launched during the 2009 holiday season -- has been largely a money loser for B&N.  The company added a color Android tablet (the Nook Color) during the holiday 2010 season, which was followed by the Nook HD and Nook HD+ tablets.  

But ultimately if E-INK were break-even or slimly profitable, with e-book sales considered, color tablets were even worse for the book seller, proving to be pure money-losers.  The sector's aggressive pace of cost cutting -- plus forced licensing from Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) -- left Barnes & Noble swallowing a loss for every tablet.

Steve Ballmer
With partners like this, who needs enemies?  Microsoft (CEO Steve Ballmer pictured) has forced Barnes & Noble into painful licensing with lawsuits, despite their common e-book business.
[Image Source: Getty Images]

The parasitic Microsoft relationship is particularly peculiar in that the pair are technically partners -- Microsoft and B&N jointly own stakes in the "Newco" e-book venture.  Microsoft owned approximately 16.8 percent stake in Newco, while B&N owned 83.2 percent ($1.49B USD) of the venture as of its April 2012 launch.  

That partnership hasn't stopped Microsoft from suing its partner over alleged patent infringements (which were eventually settled with a licensing deal).  As B&N uses Google Inc.'s (GOOG), it's as much a competitor to Microsoft as a partner (Microsoft's allies use Windows 8 or Windows RT in their tablets).  Microsoft was rumored to be eyeing a $1B USD acquisition of the entire NOOK business, but it appears that ultimately B&N has opted for a different route.

This may be a case where the licensing parasite drained a little too much, killing the host.  At the very least, the cost of lawsuits and licensing didn't help B&N.

The company's losses were further exacerbated by the fact that Q4 was a down quarter for e-book sales, with no major hits, versus a year ago which saw the release of books in the Hunger Games and Fifty Shades of Grey trilogies.  Plus Apple, Inc. (AAPL) allegedly drove up prices via anticompetitive price fixing tactics with book publishers, which raised the average cost of an e-book from $10 to $15, while giving the digital seller virtually no cut of the extra cost (while offering lower overall sales due to supply and demand).

II. Fire Sale Ahead

So what is B&N going to do to avoid allowing these losses to scuttle the entire company?  Given the severity, the company has at last sprung into action with a decisive plan of action -- one which preserves the NOOK brand in some form.

The good news for consumers is that it sounds like you should be able to potentially get the decently reviewed NOOK HD or NOOK HD+ (powered by  Android OS) at fire sale prices shortly -- or as the company puts it:

The company will continue to offer its existing inventory of its high quality NOOK® HD and NOOK® HD+ devices at amazing prices through the holiday.
The Nook HD+ series is already available at incredibly low prices. In early May, B&N was selling the 16GB and 32GB Nook HD+ models for $179 and $199 respectively. Today, the company is selling those same tablets for $149 and $179 respectively. That $149 entry price gets you a 9" 1920x1280 display, 1.5GHz dual-core processor, microSD slot, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and full support for the Google Play Store.

Looking ahead Barnes & Noble is planning a major shift to cut its losses.  It will no longer design and build its own color Android tablets.  Instead, it will rely on branded contract designs with third party OEMs.

The Nook HD and HD+ will see inventory liquidation this fall. [Image Source: B&N]

It writes:

The widely popular lines of Simple Touch™ and Glowlight™ products will continue to be developed in house, and the company’s tablet line will be co-branded with yet to be announced third party manufacturers of consumer electronics products. At the same time, the company intends to continue to build its digital catalog, adding thousands of eBooks every week, and launching new NOOK Apps™.

Ultimately this is good news for Barnes & Noble, but somewhat bad news from consumers in the long term, as the tablet market looses another viable competitor. 

It's hard to say who's to blame for B&N's decision to bow out of this market.  One could easily blame Microsoft for its allegedly high licensing fees (which are reportedly $10 USD or more per device).  One could blame B&N for poor marketing.  One could blame Amazon cost cutting -- or blame Apple and Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KSC:005930) for prompting those cuts by driving Amazon into third place.  Or one could even blame Apple's (alleged) e-book price fixing for raising the cost of e-books, cutting sales while offering no additional margin per book sold.

Of course, one could simply blame the market itself -- which is highly competitive and has high development costs with low rewards for smaller players.

Source: Barnes & Noble on BusinessWire

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

First gen
By ipay on 6/25/2013 2:37:05 PM , Rating: 2
I have a first gen Nook with E-INK, and I am not and was never interested in any of the subsequent products. The first gen has a skinny bezel, user replaceable battery, and a non-LCD screen. It has a great battery life and doesn't require touching the screen to change pages. IMO perfect for a e-book reader.

RE: First gen
By Avatar28 on 6/25/2013 3:28:00 PM , Rating: 2
I gotta tell you, my wife had the first-gen nook. I picked up one of the Nook Simple Touch readers for her this past Christmas. The new one is a significant improvement. The interface is easier to use, the newer e-ink display is easier to read, page turns are faster, and the battery life is significantly better. Touching the screen really isn't a big deal. You just tap the edge of the screen right next to where the button would have been on the original model, it doesn't take any more reaching. I totally get not wanting one of the Nook tablets as a reader but don't discount the newer e-ink readers.

RE: First gen
By ipay on 6/25/2013 3:58:00 PM , Rating: 2
Thank you. I might have to give the Simple Touch another try based on your feedback. Did you purchase the model with the GlowLight? If so, opinions?

RE: First gen
By Avatar28 on 6/26/2013 12:40:39 AM , Rating: 2
No, it was the regular one I'm afraid as that's the one that was on sale. From my research prior to that though the glo sacrificed a bit of sharpness and contrast, especially when using the light, but that it was still an excellent screen. If you're going to be reading in the dark much, it would be worth it, IMHO.

RE: First gen
By Captain Orgazmo on 6/26/2013 3:12:20 AM , Rating: 2
I have the glowlight one. Contrast is not the best (esp. compared to the Paperwhite) but the glowlight, touch, scroll buttons, and epub support is worth it. The glowlight is surprisingly handy, even during the day you will use it (except in direct sun). However I got mine before the Paperwhite came out, and if I had the choice I probably would have gone for the amazon one and used Calibre to convert eBooks as needed.

RE: First gen
By Wolfpup on 6/26/2013 7:34:56 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I VASTLY prefer the Nook 1 to the 2/Simple Touch in form factor, feel, use of physical buttons, etc.

The only problem with the Nook 1 was the screen-it's slower/lower contrast than the eInk Pearl screens used now. But it LOOKS better, has buttons, feels better, flashes on page update, etc. "Simple touch" is just...really bad.

"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki