Print 53 comment(s) - last by ClownPuncher.. on Jun 24 at 11:22 AM

Backup camera regulations delayed again

The Obama administration announced this week that it is delaying rules that would mandate backup cameras for all new automobiles. The new delays will put off any regulations for backup cameras for another 18 months. The move will undoubtedly upset safety advocates who have been pushing for all new vehicles to come with backup cameras to increase safety.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood sent letters to Congress yesterday noting that finalized requirements aren't expected until as late as January of 2015. However, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does plan to encourage automakers to install the cameras anyway before they are mandated to do so.

The recent delay marks the fifth time mandates have been pushed back and is considered a victory for automakers that have fought to prevent the mandate claiming that it's too expensive.

[Image Source: Car and Driver]

“It’s not going to get done before I leave. I’m leaving a week from Friday,” LaHood said in a Detroit News interview on Thursday. “This is an expensive rule and we just have to figure out ways to bring down the costs.”

In a letter to Congress, LaHood said, “This rulemaking is important to the department due to its focus on enhancing the safety of our children.”

Initially, the regulations requiring backup cameras were expected to be fully implemented by September 2014. Automotive manufacturers have resisted legislation because it will cost the automotive industry between $1.9 billion and $2.7 billion annually.
Backup cameras are available on many vehicles sold today as an option (some newer models -- like the new Honda CR-V and Accord -- include the feature standard).

Source: Detroit News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

2-3 Billion Dollars Really?
By unimatrix725 on 6/21/2013 12:40:07 PM , Rating: 0
I think that statement is a crock of shit. No one has to have an "HD" camera. Hell I can go to Kmart or else where and get a decent webcam for 20$ I can even go to Amazon and get a decent cctv type camera cheap too. There exists a thing called open source which is free. Imo it is the software for motion detection that will make the difference. If we go by the same logic as price we could also argue that those backup cameras are a violation of iur privacy as they can be hacked or tied to Google Glass! Omg wtf?!

RE: 2-3 Billion Dollars Really?
By 1prophet on 6/22/2013 9:30:13 AM , Rating: 2
installing a camera on your own vehicle is one thing,

installing it on millions of vehicles and adhering to federal regulations, as well as potential legal issues from incorrect operation, developing training for dealerships, spare parts procurement, etc. is a completely different thing.

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki