Print 25 comment(s) - last by peternelson.. on Jul 11 at 7:42 PM

The dummy pins on Intel Socket P are rotated 90 degrees

Intel "Santa Rosa" block diagram
New mobile socket for "Santa Rosa"

DailyTech has come across a roadmap outlining Intel’s upcoming Socket P mobile processor socket. "Socket P" will part of Intel’s next generation Santa Rosa mobile platform and will continue to be a pin-grid array based socket unlike the land-grid array based desktop processors. There will be no backwards compatibility with "Socket P," as it will be keyed differently than the current Socket M. Socket P processors will have pins A1 and A2 removed unlike pins A1 and B1 of current Socket M processors. Sacrificial "Corner Balls" will also be introduced with Socket P for greater differentiation with Socket M processors. Intel's guidance clearly states:
Not pin-compatible with Intel Core 2 Duo for Napa, or Intel Core Duo T2500

Intel’s Santa Rosa platform is expected to launch in 1H’07 with new Socket P based Core 2 Duo processors. Santa Rosa is the next major revision to Intel’s successful Centrino mobile platform and will bring a new chipset and Intel’s Robson technology. At the heart of Santa Rosa will be the upcoming Crestline GM965 Express chipset with a fourth generation integrated graphics core that will be a derivative of Intel’s GMA X3000 found on desktop G965 Express chipsets.

Socket M still has some life in it, however. Before Intel launches Santa Rosa early next year, Intel will release Merom processors in August which will run on current 945M and 945GM chipsets. This will be known as the Napa "refresh." Users should be able to use first-generation Merom processors in their current notebooks provided that their BIOS supports the new microcode.

Intel has not stated how long the new socket will last, although Socket M stuck around for more than three major CPU revisions. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By MatthewWood on 7/7/2006 12:04:16 PM , Rating: 2
Guys - is that a Trusted Platform Module attached to the Low Pin Count Bus??????? hmmm

By The Cheeba on 7/7/2006 12:07:27 PM , Rating: 2
You bet your ass it is.

By Tyler 86 on 7/7/2006 12:15:32 PM , Rating: 2

By maverick502 on 7/7/2006 12:16:01 PM , Rating: 2
Oddly it's not actually attached, either error on the graphics/publication side or maybe it's optional.

By The Cheeba on 7/7/2006 12:20:22 PM , Rating: 2
Weird... Good?

By Phynaz on 7/7/2006 12:22:18 PM , Rating: 2
Of course it's optional. TPM is a motherboard component, not a chipset component.

All this slide shows is there's hardware support for communicating with the TPM in the chipset. I'd bet every chipset released next year contains it.

By Alphafox78 on 7/7/2006 2:56:21 PM , Rating: 2
What does a TPM do?

By Hare on 7/7/2006 3:08:39 PM , Rating: 2
By Alphafox78 on 7/7/2006 3:34:20 PM , Rating: 2
wow, I dont want this.

By saratoga on 7/7/2006 5:38:55 PM , Rating: 2
It still requires software support, so what you really don't want is software thats going to try and use it.

The TPM itself is pretty harmless if you don't install stuff that can use it.

By Master Kenobi on 7/7/2006 3:40:25 PM , Rating: 2
Mother****ers is right......

By creathir on 7/7/2006 5:56:05 PM , Rating: 2
It is just attatched to the LPC...
I believe it is there just to show an example of what devices could be included down there... or maybe suggested devices...

It certainly is not a part of the chipset itself so...

- Creathir

By Xenoterranos on 7/9/2006 3:14:50 AM , Rating: 2
Isn't denial the first step?

"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki