Print 17 comment(s) - last by Donkey2008.. on Jun 23 at 10:56 PM

Trolls say they serve a valuable roll protecting inventors and business partners

In response to a request by Congress to wage war on so-called "patent trolls" -- also know as a patent assertion entity (PAE) or non-practicing entity (NPE) -- the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is expected to consider solutions to the problem via a 6 (b) probe, a type of federal investigation.

I. Prepare to Be Probed

This kind of probe is authorized under the aforementioned section in the FTC Act (specifically, 15 USC § 45), the law that created the Commission back in 1914.

FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez in recent months has opined that the patent system is growing too big to reasonably enforced.  The technology of a smartphone, for example, was likely covered by tens of thousands of patents (many of which it was in infringement of) she said.

Her organization had taken a soft approach with the so-called patent trolls in a workshop held December 10, 2012 in the capitol, co-hosted by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).  But since then Congress and the White House have been under pressure by their donors in the tech industry to take aggressive action against the trolls, who are leeching away industry profits.

The U.S. FTC is probing "patent trolling". [Image Source: TheNextWeb]

President Obama issued five executive orders earlier this month targeting the trolls.

The FTC will now vote on whether to launch the follow-up to its December workshop, a full probe.  Given the unilateral pressure from lawmakers, this seems virtually certain.

II. Trolls Fight Back

The "trolls" have long rebuked that title and claim they play a valuable role in protecting small inventors and helping some larger firms monetize their portfolios (or liquidate investments) via lawsuit-or-license schemes.  Companies like Intellectual Ventures, the alleged troll founded by former Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) chief technology officer Nathan Myrhvold, and semiconductor licensing technology firm Mosaid Technologies Inc. (TSE:MSD).

Nathan MyrhvoldNathan Myrvhold -- an ex-Microsofter -- heads one of the largest alleged "patent trolls", Intellectual Ventures. [Image Source: ZUMA Press]

Mosaid's chief intellectual property officer Scott Burt comments, "There are companies that are engaged in spurious lawsuits, seeking settlements that are less than the cost of litigation. But not us.  We are a patent-licensing company."

The NPEs (or trolls, if you prefer) are responsible for 60 percent of the roughly 4,000 patent lawsuits filed last year (up from a mere 29 percent in 2010).  And many of the lawsuits push the bounds of credibility -- such as the company who patented scanning a document and emailing it, and then proceeded to sue thousands of small businesses on the East Coast.  One major problem is that it often takes more money to fight a bad patent in court than to simply pay a small settlement to a troll.

Ms. Ramirez says the verdict on NPE's utility is still out, commenting, "A central empirical question, which we will continue to examine, is whether P.A.E.’s encourage invention or instead hamper innovation and competition."

Her board is currently short-staffed due to a deadlock in nominating a fifth commissioner.  Currently there are two Democrats and two Republicans on the FTC.  However, the trolling issue is arguably outside party lines as the tech companies affected donate to both parties.

The only concern about an inquiry is that it could broadly expose business information and trade secrets of alleged NPEs.

Assuming the inquiry proceeds, it's important to remember that no action will be taken -- the inquiry would only be for the purpose of generating recommendations to Congress.  Congress has been sluggish in acting on the issue.  But once the FTC finishes up, it may be budged into action at last.

Source: The New York Times

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: the trolls are not the issue...
By timothyd97402 on 6/20/2013 4:00:18 PM , Rating: 1
Parrot much?

Apple did not patent a shape. They patented "trade dress" which involved many, many things beyond simply patenting a rectangle with rounded corners. "Trade dress" has been in use for a long time. It was supposed to prevent people from selling nearly identical knock offs of name brand products.

Samsung went to extraordinary lengths to identify every aspect of an iPhone's appeal so that they could then implement the same features. Now they have moved on and are doing quite nice designs of their own. But make no mistake, copycat they did. Samsung documents that detail the practice are part of court records.

Trolls are part of the issue. Many of them engage in get rich quick schemes looking for little known patents that they can buy cheap to then use to threaten hundreds over even thousands of people with lawsuit. It is a nuisance and everyone knows it but it is cheaper not to fight and the trolls know it.

The ability to patent nearly anything is another. Software was never meant to be patented. It is akin to writing a murder mystery with a clever plot twist. You can copyright it but anyone can write their own book and use that plot twist without issue. If software patents had been around in the 70's there would be no PC's unless IBM made them...

RE: the trolls are not the issue...
By Cheesew1z69 on 6/20/2013 7:14:49 PM , Rating: 2
But make no mistake, copycat they did.
LOL, no, they really didn't.

By maugrimtr on 6/21/2013 11:01:02 AM , Rating: 2
Apple patented a rectangle with rounded corners. That's the common sense interpretation of the patent. Sure, there is all sorts of legal and technical jargon needed to address a rectangle with rounded corners - but it is what it is. A rectangle. With rounded corners.

Given that phones are overwhelming rectangular, and that a keyless phone would be 90%+ screen very obviously, their patent is trash and should never have been granted.

By Donkey2008 on 6/23/2013 10:56:18 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe not, but HTC certainly did. The Incredible was the most blatant copy of an iphone of any Droid device to date. It was a piece of crap on top of that.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki