Print 88 comment(s) - last by Go_Plugless.. on Jun 26 at 9:42 PM

It's only for the Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf

Bosch is giving electric vehicle (EV) drivers a wireless charging option, and even new financing plans to help them afford it. 

Bosch Automotive Service Solutions teamed up with Evatran Group Inc. to offer a Level 2 240-volt wireless charging unit. It's only compatible with the Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf for now, but will open up to other models later. 

Bosch recently announced its wired charging system, Power Max home charging. It only costs $449 while the new wireless system costs a whopping $3,000 -- but Bosch believes that convenience will be key to sales of the expensive wireless option.

“The main reason is convenience,” Kevin Mull, vice president of business development at Bosch Automotive Service Solutions told PluginCars. “We think this is a very viable future technology and over time, with advancements in technology, the price will start to come down.”

To help EV drivers who want the wired or wireless system, but can't afford it, Bosch is offering financing options. Option #1 includes $0 down with no monthly payments for 12 months if repaid in full in a year for charging stations that cost $1,000 or more. Option #2 offers $0 down and a five-year 2.99 percent loan on charging stations of $3,500 or more (including installation).

Source: Plugin Cars

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Efficiency
By fanscale on 6/17/2013 9:25:34 AM , Rating: 2
I'm sorry there were individuals here complaining about power efficiency, when they don't actually know what they are saying.
Nearly everything you have does not have 100% or even 99% efficiency. A bridge rectifier, the old way of turning AC into DC outputs at 80%.
Unless you change everything to superconductors there is going to be power lost everywhere.
I don't know much about internal combustion engines but I would imagine a lot of the power is lost.

Get a 101% efficiency and you have invented something that never needs to be refueled. !!

RE: Efficiency
By karimtemple on 6/17/2013 9:46:39 AM , Rating: 2
A moot point when you're talking about choice. A charger loses power. Your only choice otherwise is to not use a rechargeable battery. But once you do get a rechargeable battery, you have the choice to lose 20% of the power or 44% (70% of 80%) of the power.

I won't argue that the choice is bad or not, or that convenience is or isn't better than resource conservation. But I will say that your argument -- that losing 44% of the power doesn't matter because we were losing 20% anyway -- is not a valid argument.

RE: Efficiency
By BRB29 on 6/17/2013 9:55:10 AM , Rating: 2
If wireless charging takes 10-20% hit in efficiency but greatly spread the use of EV then I would not hesitate to use it. Comparing that to how inefficient an ICE engine is along with its environmental concerns, it's not a hard choice.

RE: Efficiency
By karimtemple on 6/17/2013 10:24:03 AM , Rating: 2
Personally, the main reason I'll be getting an EV (the ~2015 "~$30k" Tesla, probably) is to save money on fueling. Tossing around 30% of the savings seems silly. I'll be plugging mine in. Let me know when the "90%" resonance charging gets out of the lab.

"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki