Print 69 comment(s) - last by SlyNine.. on Jun 29 at 12:48 AM

  (Source: AP)
WSJ report cites sources close to agency saying holes in interception are filled by data grabs at a lower level

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, sources close to the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) warn about a potential "blind spot" in their phone record (aka "telephony metadata") scheme that allows them to track the call records and locations of Americans on a daily basis.

I. T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless Make Spying on Americans Trickier...

The source states that T-Mobile's foreign ownership (T-Mobile is owned primarily by Germany's Deutsche Telekom AG (ETR:DTE)) and Verizon Wireless's foreign co-ownership (UK-based Vodafone Group Plc. (LON:VOD) has a 45 percent stake in Verizon Wireless) made seizing phone records under the Oct. 2001 USA PATRIOT (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act slightly harder.  

Both companies reportedly at times refused to participate in the program, although U.S. Verizon Wireless parent company Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) did turn in information on its land lines, which it solely serves.  And reportedly the U.S. government did not challenge theirt waivering cooperation.

Obama spying
Foreign co-owned carriers have reportedly been less than enthusiastic about Bush and Obama administration spying. [Image Source: AP]

But don't worry -- says the source -- Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile customers are still able to be monitored anyways.  Most of that traffic on Verizon or T-Mobile is at some point routed through connections owned by solely-U.S.-owned telecoms like AT&T, Inc. (T) or Sprint Nextel Corp. (S).  Thanks to this wonderful routing, the source assures, approximately 99 percent of phone traffic in the U.S. is monitored by the NSA.

II. ...But When There's a Will, Big Brother Has a Way 

A pending acquisition of Sprint might seemingly shift that balance if Japan's Softbank Corp. (TYO:9984) wins in its bid for most of the U.S. carrier.  But it will likely have little effect.

T-Mobile or smaller U.S. carriers often fill in holes in their coverage by allowing customers to roam onto solely-U.S. owned networks like AT&T.  This is one spot where the NSA can intercept the phone data.

And ultimately the NSA can always monitor at an even lower level, if necessary -- the high speed telecommunications backbone that underlies both landlines and wireless networks.  And that infrastructure is solely owned by U.S. firms -- AT&T and Verizon Business Network Services Inc. (a subsidiary of Verizon Communications).  Thus regardless of who owns the cellular carriers, the NSA can (and in many cases reportedly already does) seize communications at the lowest level, eliminating pesky civil liberties complaints by foreign nations.

fiber optics
Communications can be seized at the U.S.-owned backbone that underlies wireless networks.
[Image Source: AP]

In a letter to Rep. Edward Markey (D., Mass.) Verizon Wireless admits [PDF] it did turn over records some of the time.  It says it responded to 260,000 customer data requests in 2011 (although it did not say how many customers were involved per request).  Of those half of the orders were without warrant (due proccess) while approximately half were via a court order or warrant.

According to sources, U.S. officials recognized the foreign leadership of T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless might lead them to buck the data gathering if they pushed the issue too hard.  So the feds kept their requests relatively small, knowing they could seize the information they missed further down the pipe.

Recent surveys showed approximately half of Americans are comfortable with the goverment tracking their locations (phone records).

Sources: WSJ, Verizon Wireless [PDF]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By TheEinstein on 6/14/2013 7:16:03 PM , Rating: 5
Will you all be scared then finally?

By Stuka on 6/14/2013 8:39:29 PM , Rating: 1
The parties need to be renamed. They bleed across each other on every topic except select "social" issues. Politically, they are carbon copies anymore.

Democratic Party = Marxist Party
Republican Party = Jesus Party

Futurama nailed it years ago when Nixon's head ended up getting elected 'cos the choices were the clones, Jack Johnson and John Jackson.

By espaghetti on 6/15/2013 7:31:34 AM , Rating: 2
The leaders of the "establishment republicans" are constantly giving up on second amendment, illegal immigration, programs that take away your privacy, covering up horrible events that get Americans killed over seas, then I only see one party.

You call it what you want but it needs to go.

By tamalero on 6/16/2013 9:19:56 PM , Rating: 2
and putting restrictions on minorities and women rights.

By Jeffk464 on 6/15/2013 11:32:29 AM , Rating: 5
You missed the point, both parties are heavily influenced/controlled by corporations. This is the main reason its hard to tell them apart.

By Belard on 6/19/2013 12:57:30 PM , Rating: 2
And what major corporations are you thinking is controlling the Dems?

By ironargonaut on 6/18/2013 2:23:57 PM , Rating: 2
The arguement that both parties are the same is simply a justification for ones lazyness/lack of responsibility. If it is claimed that both parties "are carbon copies", then it does not matter whom you voted for, thereby relieving you of any personal responsibility for voting for whatever official is in office screwing up. If you didn't vote then you are once again relieved of responsibility because of course it wouldn't have made a difference if both are "carbon copies" whom you had voted for. And, now you don't have to actually follow what is happening or become informed and lord forbid, actually take a side.
Basically, your arguement is a copout.

By vol7ron on 6/15/2013 12:24:10 PM , Rating: 3
I'm not Republican and I don't believe a tech site is the best forum for a political debate, but I also don't think it should condone ignorance, so I think it's funny how you talk about fear when your first choice of President is currently in the limelight for ~7 significant scandals, 3 of which are so major that the news doesn't even know what to concentrate on - they keep bouncing back and forth. You shouldn't be so party-line that you ignore the person that is representing your beliefs - just like I wouldn't want Clinton talking about strong moral fiber and family values.

As a current Libertarian, which is not set in stone and could change in the future, I think it's your duty to consider why Liberals are so liberal and Conservatives, so conservative. There are smart people in both parties and both have justifiable points of view. Don't be so quick to act/judge; believe what you believe, but don't stop questioning (yourself or others) to find what's right, instead of blindly imposing your beliefs on others - it's a duty we should all accept.

The following doesn't belong here, but I found it humorous, so maybe TheEinstein will also get a laugh out of it:

By retrospooty on 6/17/2013 8:08:09 AM , Rating: 2
Well said ... +1

By TheEinstein on 6/18/2013 4:20:31 PM , Rating: 2
Great cartoon

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki