backtop


Print 99 comment(s) - last by Piiman.. on Jun 15 at 12:42 PM


  (Source: CNN)
Homeland Security committee member things freedom of the press in the U.S. is growing tiresome

What do President Barack Obama (D) and Rep. Peter King (R- N.Y.) have in common?  They are none too happy about the sources and the journalists involved in the publication of secrets on the NSA snooping on Americans.

I. Forget Freedom of the Press, Says Rep. King

In an interview with Anderson Cooper last night, Rep. King, who sits on the House Homeland Security committee, said that Glenn Greenwald of the Guardian and other journalists involved in the publication of details of the U.S. National Security Agency's (NSA) program to secretly spy on Americans should be charged and face prison time.

He comments:

Actually, if they willing knew that this was classified information, I think action should be taken, especially on something of this magnitude.  I know that the whole issue of leaks has been gone into over the last month. I think something on this magnitude, there is an obligation, both moral but also legal, I believe, against a reporter disclosing something which would so severely compromise national security.


President Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder has reportedly carried out campaigns to spy on a Fox News reporter who was involved in the publication of leaked intelligence details on North Korea.  In that case, AG Holder signed early documents suggesting that the journalist -- James Rosen -- was considered a "co-conspirator" to the leaker and could face criminal charges.  The effort to charge the journalists was ultimately dropped as the investigation proceeded, but drew substantial criticism.

Eric Holder
AG Eric Holder has considered charging journalists in previous leaks. [Image Source: AP]

AG Holder also supervised a program to monitor dozens of Associated Press phone lines in an effort to hunt down the person who leaked details of a foiled bomb plot.

The Obama administration has charged more than twice as many whistleblowers with Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. § 792) offenses as all the previous administrations before him (since the Act was passed in 1917) combined.  But he's only been able to do that thanks to support of the practices by members of Congress, including House Republicans like Rep. King.

II. FBI Works Towards Charging Whistleblower

News of the long rumored NSA spying -- funded by Barack Obama's "big data" spending program -- broke last week.  Details of two programs -- a narrow, more aggressive program dubbed PRISM and a broad, ubiquitous unnamed phone records seizure program leaked.  According to the Obama administration the PRISM effort involved the seizure of email and chat records, but was meant to target suspected terrorists -- most foreigners -- and was limited to a small number of individuals.

By contrast the phone records seizure tracked the majority of U.S. citizens -- including those who never communicated with a foreigner and never were suspected of committing a crime.  The Obama administration sought to downplay this spying saying it was "only metadata".  However, that "metadata" contained records of who you talked to and when, plus tracked the locations of citizens on a daily basis.

Both programs were authorized under the Oct. 2001 USA PATRIOT (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act.

FBI masked agent
The FBI is drafting chargers against the leaker, and possibly journalists.
[Image Source: Alamy]

On Sunday, the leaker outed himself as Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the NSA who worked at Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH).  Rep. King was among the first to call on him to be charged.  The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) is rumored be currently drafting up those charges.  Mr. Snowden is rumored to be holed up at a safe house in Hong Kong.

Source: CNN on YouTube



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By TSS on 6/13/2013 7:12:39 AM , Rating: 2
I wholehardidly disagree with your post.

The big difference between now and the past is the capability of technology. Storage capacity has increased exponentially, so has computing power. Where it used to be possible to only store a number of who called who and when, it's now possible to store the entire conversation. As well as internet being intergrated with everybodies lives and everybody has a smartphone so the amount of calls and thus people affected have gone way, way up.

Also US administrative powers are more corrupt then a decade ago. Corruption isn't a binary thing, as in you either are or you aren't. It's gradual with alot of shades of gray. Obama truely is more corrupt then bush ever was. He has already shown to target opponents directly, there's no way he didn't know about the IRS thing.

Let me give you an example of why it's dangerous to store and be able to find everything for all time. Right now the US has a democrat government. Because of all the scandals, it's likely republicans are up again next. Since the democrats pulled the trigger first they will have to make sure they cannot be targeted again -> take down the political opposition, the democrats.

After the opposition comes opponents of the regime. Considering their budget proposals about cutting government spending, they will most likely run on a platform of "small government". Wether they actually spend less or not doesn't matter, it's just the propaganda they'll use because democrats stand for big government spending. Ofcourse as mentioned they will continue to hunt down opponents of their regime to make sure it isn't threatened.

quote:
I'm a big fan of the gov't spending on these type of big projects.


That's what you said april 23 in a reply to NASA expenditatures. Would you care to explain why you support large government expenditatures in a time where everybody needs to cut back? Are you trying to bring this nation down with frivolous spending?

Terrorist.

Likely? no. Within the realm of possibility? Yes. And that's what has changed in the past 10 years. That yes used to be a No. Also enough people are aware of it and are willing to belive it.

This is the time to do something about it. What should be done is obvious: Impeach obama, new elections, vote a 3rd party. Somebody independant. There's 8 parties that run every election, use the frickin internet instead of the TV who to decide for. If this isn't done, the next guy is not only going to be worse, he's going to have carte blanche to do whatever he wants.

Mark my words: If obama doesn't get impeached over this and the other scandals, and he makes a full term, it's over. The US will *officially* be a dictatorship. The powers that be will know they can do anything to the US public and they will take it (as long as the EBT cards keep working). The only question left will be wether it's gonna be a blue or red day when the crackdowns come.


By BRB29 on 6/13/2013 8:13:08 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
I wholehardidly disagree with your post. The big difference between now and the past is the capability of technology. Storage capacity has increased exponentially, so has computing power.


Yep you're right but the amount of communications data had increased exponentially as well. It used to be 1 land line per household and some doesn't even have one. Now everyone has a phone or more, multiple email accounts, text, pics, videos, facebook, twitter, etc...

quote:
Also US administrative powers are more corrupt then a decade ago

I don't think anybody understand what you mean specifically by US administrative powers. At least not anyone that understand how the federal government work. Corruption exist everywhere including the government. There is much less corruption in ours than most other countries. You only think ours is bad because you don't see/hear the news in their country. Vietnam, China, Mexico, Russia, Brazil, Italy, etc... every country has their problems. If you think another country is so good then move there. As of right now, people from everywhere are flocking to the US. Yes plenty even from the Euro Zone.

quote:
After the opposition comes opponents of the regime. Considering their budget proposals about cutting government spending

Budget approval and proposal are actually the same as any bill going through Congress. It started there and gets voted there.

quote:
That's what you said april 23 in a reply to NASA expenditatures. Would you care to explain why you support large government expenditatures in a time where everybody needs to cut back? Are you trying to bring this nation down with frivolous spending?

NASA has done way more good than anyone can actually imagined. The technology they developed and scientific theories they've proven have shaped the entire world. It wasn't long ago that nobody cares about quantum mechanics and particle physics. Even today people don't realize all the electronics they use are based on these theories. Did you know that MRI scan uses antimatter?

If anything, the way mankind is going, I would say NASA is our hope for survival in the future.

quote:
This is the time to do something about it. What should be done is obvious: Impeach obama, new elections, vote a 3rd party. Somebody independant

Um... there's no new election after you impeach a president. Please check how many independent politicians out there.

quote:
Mark my words: If obama doesn't get impeached over this and the other scandals, and he makes a full term, it's over. The US will *officially* be a dictatorship

lol wake up buddy, you're dreaming


"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki