Print 99 comment(s) - last by Piiman.. on Jun 15 at 12:42 PM

  (Source: CNN)
Homeland Security committee member things freedom of the press in the U.S. is growing tiresome

What do President Barack Obama (D) and Rep. Peter King (R- N.Y.) have in common?  They are none too happy about the sources and the journalists involved in the publication of secrets on the NSA snooping on Americans.

I. Forget Freedom of the Press, Says Rep. King

In an interview with Anderson Cooper last night, Rep. King, who sits on the House Homeland Security committee, said that Glenn Greenwald of the Guardian and other journalists involved in the publication of details of the U.S. National Security Agency's (NSA) program to secretly spy on Americans should be charged and face prison time.

He comments:

Actually, if they willing knew that this was classified information, I think action should be taken, especially on something of this magnitude.  I know that the whole issue of leaks has been gone into over the last month. I think something on this magnitude, there is an obligation, both moral but also legal, I believe, against a reporter disclosing something which would so severely compromise national security.

President Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder has reportedly carried out campaigns to spy on a Fox News reporter who was involved in the publication of leaked intelligence details on North Korea.  In that case, AG Holder signed early documents suggesting that the journalist -- James Rosen -- was considered a "co-conspirator" to the leaker and could face criminal charges.  The effort to charge the journalists was ultimately dropped as the investigation proceeded, but drew substantial criticism.

Eric Holder
AG Eric Holder has considered charging journalists in previous leaks. [Image Source: AP]

AG Holder also supervised a program to monitor dozens of Associated Press phone lines in an effort to hunt down the person who leaked details of a foiled bomb plot.

The Obama administration has charged more than twice as many whistleblowers with Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. § 792) offenses as all the previous administrations before him (since the Act was passed in 1917) combined.  But he's only been able to do that thanks to support of the practices by members of Congress, including House Republicans like Rep. King.

II. FBI Works Towards Charging Whistleblower

News of the long rumored NSA spying -- funded by Barack Obama's "big data" spending program -- broke last week.  Details of two programs -- a narrow, more aggressive program dubbed PRISM and a broad, ubiquitous unnamed phone records seizure program leaked.  According to the Obama administration the PRISM effort involved the seizure of email and chat records, but was meant to target suspected terrorists -- most foreigners -- and was limited to a small number of individuals.

By contrast the phone records seizure tracked the majority of U.S. citizens -- including those who never communicated with a foreigner and never were suspected of committing a crime.  The Obama administration sought to downplay this spying saying it was "only metadata".  However, that "metadata" contained records of who you talked to and when, plus tracked the locations of citizens on a daily basis.

Both programs were authorized under the Oct. 2001 USA PATRIOT (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act.

FBI masked agent
The FBI is drafting chargers against the leaker, and possibly journalists.
[Image Source: Alamy]

On Sunday, the leaker outed himself as Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the NSA who worked at Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH).  Rep. King was among the first to call on him to be charged.  The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) is rumored be currently drafting up those charges.  Mr. Snowden is rumored to be holed up at a safe house in Hong Kong.

Source: CNN on YouTube

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Finally!
By MrBlastman on 6/13/2013 12:10:02 AM , Rating: 2
I didn't vote for any of those jackasses.

My first candidate, Herman Cain was thrown under a bus by his own party (the Republican) and set up by them with plants and conspiracies.

My second candidate, Newt Gingrich lost the nomination (but won my State at least).

Screw Obama and Romney. Neither of them were worthy of my vote.

Note: When write-ins are allowed, I generally vote for Elvis Pressley. The King lives!

Yes, the people get who they deserve. It is shameful that most of them don't give a darn enough to pay attention and DEMAND representation of 3rd parties on major media networks. Of course, since the Democrat and Republican parties own them, this will never happen.

RE: Finally!
By stilltrying on 6/13/2013 6:43:50 AM , Rating: 2
Still believing in fairy tales. Keep on voting for those put in front of you that are own and controlled. Voting will not change this. Why do we have to have slave masters?

Rape victims supporting their rapers. Governments sole existence is based upon FORCE. Force to kill, force to tax, force to steal, force to regulate.

RE: Finally!
By MrBlastman on 6/13/2013 3:28:34 PM , Rating: 2
Fairy tales? The need for third parties being properly represented is not a fairy tale, it is reality!

Governments sole existence is based upon FORCE. Force to kill, force to tax, force to steal, force to regulate.

What's your point here? The NSA is watching, btw. I read between the lines and see what you mean but it would require Americans willing to abandon the coddling they have and embrace the uncertain unknown before them.

It'd be a big step and end this cycle we are in but people have to be willing to sacrifice and go all in with their efforts and dedication.

RE: Finally!
By Piiman on 6/15/2013 12:20:54 PM , Rating: 2
"Fairy tales? The need for third parties being properly represented is not a fairy tale, it is reality!"

But your first two picks were from the Republican Party?? LOL nothing like practicing what you preach.

RE: Finally!
By BRB29 on 6/14/2013 10:40:54 AM , Rating: 2
Newt Gingrich lost the nomination

Newt is as bad or worse than Romney. He is clearly a racist and have terrible relations with the public besides white males.

RE: Finally!
By MrBlastman on 6/14/2013 10:06:06 PM , Rating: 2
He's no more racist than our current President--or the general public who likes to play the race card anytime anything is said about any race at the opportune moment.

In other words--the whole damn "racist" term is used far too often.

In no way was Newt worse than Romney. For one thing he doesn't have mega-millions and for another, he isn't utterly out of touch with the general population. I'd take him any day over Romney. Romney was a worthless sack of crap that was pushed on us by the mainstream media because they knew he couldn't win the presidency on the ballot. What is sad is the American public bought into it and... viola, he won the nomination.

Face it, we are slaves to the media until we learn to think for ourselves.

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki