New Jersey Bill Would Allow Cops to Search Your Cell Phone Messages, Calls After Crash
June 12, 2013 4:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
New law is meant to determine if you were talking/texting while driving, but represents a gross invasion of privacy
Expect this one to light up the appeals court if it's passed: New Jersey's state senate is considering a bill (
) that would allow a police officer to seize your cell phone and check your messages and phone calls to see if you were talking or
texting when the accident occurred
Back in 2007, New Jersey became one of the first states to ban texting while driving (
P.L. 2007, c.198
[PDF]). It currently is also working on a bill (
No. 69 R1
) that would increase the penalties of texting while driving by a couple hundred dollars, plus at three points to a drivers license for every offense after the second one.
But those efforts pale in comparison to the latest effort -- the cell phone seizure act – that grants
bold new powers to the police
. Its synopsis unequivocally states:
Permits police officer to confiscate cell phones under certain circumstances; increases penalties for texting while driving.
Sen. Jim Hopzapfel (R-Ocean) sponsored the seizure bill. [Image Source: Facebook]
The provisions of exactly when an officer can seize your phone are pretty ambiguous. The bill states a phone may be seized:
[If] the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the operator involved in the accident was operating a hand-held wireless telephone while driving a motor vehicle [prior to the accident.]
State Sen. James Holzapfel
(R-Ocean) sponsored the bill. He tells
, "Think about it: The chances of the cop witnessing the accident are slim to none."
Local police are already salivating at their new potential powers. Comments Sgt. Ken Drost, who works in South Brunswick and is president of the Middlesex County Traffic Officers Association, "It’s one of the questions you ask them: ‘Were you on your cell phone at the time of the crash?’ And, of course, they say ‘no.' Without the phone you really can’t tell."
Prepare to have your phone seized. [Image Source: Getty Images]
But the possibility of new powers of seizure for police is already drawing the ire of many groups.
Steve Carrellas, New Jersey representative of the National Motorists Association, says that even with the Orwellian seizure you won't be able to really "tell" if the phone caused the crash. He remarks, "Here’s the bottom line: If you went all through what the bill is supposedly allowing, you still can’t determine if the person with the phone actually had a distraction that contributed to a crash."
American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey
crafting a "constitutional challenge"
should the bill be enacted. Local counsel Alexander Shalom comments, "This bill is problematic because it infringes on the privacy rights of citizens. Our state and federal constitutions generally require probable cause before authorizing a search, particularly when it comes to areas that contain highly personal information such as cell phones."
A major question that the bill's proponents have not addressed is the question of what happens if you lock your phone. If you safeguard your phone with a gesture or password, it's unclear whether an officer or court could punish you for failing to unlock. This is a similar question to the issue of whether police have the right to demand
forced decryption of suspects' hard drives
NJ State Senate
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: More crap articles from Jason Mick
6/13/2013 12:19:30 AM
That's because the major push in vehicle safety started since the 70s
In 1974, GM offered driver and passenger airbags as optional equipment on large Cadillacs, Buicks, and Oldsmobiles.
In 1979 NHTSA began crash-testing popular cars and publishing the results, to inform consumers and encourage manufacturers to improve the safety of their vehicles. Initially, the US NCAP (New Car Assessment Program) crash tests examined compliance with the occupant-protection provisions of FMVSS 208. Over the subsequent years, this NHTSA program was gradually expanded in scope. In 1997, the European European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) was established to test new vehicles' safety performance and publish the results for vehicle shoppers' information. The NHTSA crash tests are presently operated and published as the U.S. branch of the international NCAP programme.
In 1984 New York State passed the first US law requiring seat belt use in passenger cars. Seat belt laws have since been adopted by all 50 states, except for New Hampshire. and NHTSA estimates increased seat belt use as a result save 10,000 per year in the USA.
In 1986 the central 3rd brake light was mandated in North America with most of the world following with similar standards in automotive lighting.
In 1995 the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) began frontal offset crash tests.
In 1997 EuroNCAP was founded.
In 2003 the IIHS began conducting side impact crash tests.
In 2004 NHTSA released new tests designed to test the rollover risk of new cars and SUVs. Only the Mazda RX-8 got a 5-star rating.
In 2009 Citroën became the first manufacturer to feature "Snowmotion", an Intelligent Anti Skid system developed in conjunction with Bosch, which gives drivers a level of control in extreme ice or snow conditions similar to a 4x4
In 2009 NHTSA upgraded its roof-crush standard for vehicles weighing 6000 pounds or less. The new standard increased the crush load requirement from 1.5 to 3 times the vehicle's curb weight.
Yes cell phones is just one of the problems. During the 90s the cool thing was the have a retarded sound systems with dubs blasting Big Tymers and racing down the street. Now it's smartphones, texting and facebook. While they may replace one bad habit with another, if we don't do anything then it could mean they'll blast music, race, text, and facebook all at the same time. We need to prevent as many idiot drivers as possible. They may not be murderers but if they killed someone by accident then it's still a dead innocent person.
I've seen so many paralyzed or dead people because of drunk drivers. Playing with your phone is almost just as bad. I used to just have to dodge drunk drivers at night. Now I have to dodge people on their phone during the day too.
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates
ACLU Sues Government for Tracking Citizens; Boehner Calls NSA Leaker a "Traitor"
June 11, 2013, 8:46 PM
Federal Judge Grants Reprieve to Suspect Facing Forced Hard Drive Decryption
June 5, 2013, 6:18 PM
AT&T: More Adults Text and Drive Than Teens, Employers May be to Blame
April 1, 2013, 8:02 AM
UPDATED: U.S. Police Begin Warrantless Phone Data Grabs, ACLU Fights Back
April 21, 2011, 2:20 PM
Ford, Toyota, and Universal Pictures Celebrate "Back to the Future Day' in Style
October 21, 2015, 4:19 PM
Consumer Reports Flexes Muscle, Hits Slumping Tesla Motors Stock
October 20, 2015, 4:13 PM
Debunked: Beneath the Lies, Nigerian "Pee Generator" Is Still Pissing Into the Wind
October 19, 2015, 7:53 PM
Hot Air? President Obama, G7 Pledge to Eliminate Most Fossil Fuel Use by 2100
June 8, 2015, 5:40 PM
Study Predicts Self-Driving Vehicles Could Rake in Billions
March 6, 2015, 8:34 AM
Dual-Motor Tesla Model S P85D's "Insane Mode" Shocks Passengers
January 28, 2015, 11:18 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information