New Jersey Bill Would Allow Cops to Search Your Cell Phone Messages, Calls After Crash
June 12, 2013 4:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
New law is meant to determine if you were talking/texting while driving, but represents a gross invasion of privacy
Expect this one to light up the appeals court if it's passed: New Jersey's state senate is considering a bill (
) that would allow a police officer to seize your cell phone and check your messages and phone calls to see if you were talking or
texting when the accident occurred
Back in 2007, New Jersey became one of the first states to ban texting while driving (
P.L. 2007, c.198
[PDF]). It currently is also working on a bill (
No. 69 R1
) that would increase the penalties of texting while driving by a couple hundred dollars, plus at three points to a drivers license for every offense after the second one.
But those efforts pale in comparison to the latest effort -- the cell phone seizure act – that grants
bold new powers to the police
. Its synopsis unequivocally states:
Permits police officer to confiscate cell phones under certain circumstances; increases penalties for texting while driving.
Sen. Jim Hopzapfel (R-Ocean) sponsored the seizure bill. [Image Source: Facebook]
The provisions of exactly when an officer can seize your phone are pretty ambiguous. The bill states a phone may be seized:
[If] the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the operator involved in the accident was operating a hand-held wireless telephone while driving a motor vehicle [prior to the accident.]
State Sen. James Holzapfel
(R-Ocean) sponsored the bill. He tells
, "Think about it: The chances of the cop witnessing the accident are slim to none."
Local police are already salivating at their new potential powers. Comments Sgt. Ken Drost, who works in South Brunswick and is president of the Middlesex County Traffic Officers Association, "It’s one of the questions you ask them: ‘Were you on your cell phone at the time of the crash?’ And, of course, they say ‘no.' Without the phone you really can’t tell."
Prepare to have your phone seized. [Image Source: Getty Images]
But the possibility of new powers of seizure for police is already drawing the ire of many groups.
Steve Carrellas, New Jersey representative of the National Motorists Association, says that even with the Orwellian seizure you won't be able to really "tell" if the phone caused the crash. He remarks, "Here’s the bottom line: If you went all through what the bill is supposedly allowing, you still can’t determine if the person with the phone actually had a distraction that contributed to a crash."
American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey
crafting a "constitutional challenge"
should the bill be enacted. Local counsel Alexander Shalom comments, "This bill is problematic because it infringes on the privacy rights of citizens. Our state and federal constitutions generally require probable cause before authorizing a search, particularly when it comes to areas that contain highly personal information such as cell phones."
A major question that the bill's proponents have not addressed is the question of what happens if you lock your phone. If you safeguard your phone with a gesture or password, it's unclear whether an officer or court could punish you for failing to unlock. This is a similar question to the issue of whether police have the right to demand
forced decryption of suspects' hard drives
NJ State Senate
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: More crap articles from Jason Mick
6/12/2013 7:14:30 PM
You imagine. Exactly... I like to stick with reality. :)
In reality this is simply a law to check if a person of concern was talking, or texting, during the time of an accident. You know, BREAKING THE LAW.
RE: More crap articles from Jason Mick
6/12/2013 7:28:15 PM
Ah yes, to hell with the Fifth Amendment. Require me to hand over my personal property without due process (i.e., getting a warrant) so that I can incriminate myself about breaking the law. Virtually 100% of the time the officer did not see me on the phone. Hell, in a high percentage of the time the person driving the other care didn't see me on the phone either! So just demand that I hand over my cell phone and provide what could appear to be (but might not really be, see my other posts) self incriminating evidence which will be utilized at the officers sole discretion!
Hell, you're not officially, legally at fault for the accident until you either admit that it was your fault or the courts say it was your fault. How is handing over your cell phone so the officer can view your calling/texting history not a forced admission of guilt (assuming you were on a call)?
RE: More crap articles from Jason Mick
6/13/2013 12:26:07 AM
I don't agree with this potential law. It's dumb anyways because I can easily delete my text or call history in seconds.
I don't see why they need to do this. If someone is drifting all over the place because they're distracted then just give them a damn ticket for driving while distracted or wreckless driving. They can explain it in court with the judge.
If you hurt someone, then I hope you turn yourself in and be honest. If you did lie, it wouldn't make that much of a difference because that's trivial compared to what you have to deal with. You'll probably still get charged with other things anyways. I'm sure the judge can probably figure out if you're lying or not.
"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
ACLU Sues Government for Tracking Citizens; Boehner Calls NSA Leaker a "Traitor"
June 11, 2013, 8:46 PM
Federal Judge Grants Reprieve to Suspect Facing Forced Hard Drive Decryption
June 5, 2013, 6:18 PM
AT&T: More Adults Text and Drive Than Teens, Employers May be to Blame
April 1, 2013, 8:02 AM
UPDATED: U.S. Police Begin Warrantless Phone Data Grabs, ACLU Fights Back
April 21, 2011, 2:20 PM
Reports: Porsche Working on Tesla Model S Competitor, All 991.2 911s to Get Turbo Engines
October 27, 2014, 8:28 AM
Michigan Governor Signs “Anti Tesla” Bill That Bans Direct Sales, GM Applauds Decision
October 22, 2014, 8:56 AM
Report: 2015 Ford Focus Electric MSRP Slashed by $6,000, Will Retail for $29,995
October 18, 2014, 6:23 PM
Chevrolet Sonic EV to Have 200-mile Range, Debut in 2017
October 10, 2014, 12:01 PM
Auto Start-Stop Systems Will be Installed on Nearly 60% of New Vehicles by 2020
October 8, 2014, 4:19 PM
Volvo XC90 to Receive Triple-turbocharged, 450hp 2.0-liter Four-cylinder Engine
October 7, 2014, 2:29 PM
Most Popular Articles
Amid Theater Boycott Netflix Defiantly Plans New Movies, Plus 3 TV Shows for 2015
October 24, 2014, 7:30 PM
AT&T Defeats Purpose of New Apple SIM, Locks iPad Air 2 SIMs to Its Network
October 24, 2014, 2:17 PM
CVS, Rite Aid Kill Unofficial Apple Pay Support, Burn Google Wallet Users in the Process
October 25, 2014, 5:26 PM
1 Million Credit Card Activated on Apple Pay Within 72 Hours, Walmart CEO Hopes Visa "Suffers"
October 28, 2014, 8:17 AM
Microsoft's Figures Show Desktop Users Flocking to Windows 10 Preview
October 27, 2014, 11:04 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information