backtop


Print 43 comment(s) - last by MrBlastman.. on Jun 14 at 10:01 PM

Gamers outperformed non-gamers at every time interval in visual tests

Gamers who sit in front of their consoles all day may actually be gaining better visual and decision-making abilities over non-gamers. 

Duke University researchers, led by Greg Appelbaum (an assistant professor of psychiatry in the Duke School of Medicine), found that gamers were better at quick visual and decision-making tests than non-gamers. 

The study used 125 college participants who were either hardcore gamers or non-gamers. The participants were asked to play a certain game where eight letters were arranged in a circle. The letters only appeared for one-tenth of a second.

Once the letters vanished, an arrow would point to a certain area in the circle where a letter had been. It was up to the participants to remember which letter was in that position. 

According to the study's results, delays in decision-making ranged from 13 milliseconds to 2.5 seconds. Both gamers and non-gamers experienced a rapid decay in memory of where the letters had been, but one thing was for sure -- gamers were quicker to the draw than non-gamers at every time interval.


Appelbaum explained that our visual system analyzes and sifts information out from what the eyes are seeing. Data that isn't used decays quickly, and while gamers sift the unused data about as fast as anyone else, they seem to be starting with more information before they even begin.

Playing video games means paying close attention to the surroundings within the fictional world to either ward off enemies, find important items or travel to a certain destination. Appelbaum said that putting a lot of time into these kinds of games can increase experience, and allow the gamers to have a better sense of visual placement and decision-making. 

This led the researchers to conclude that gamers likely see better overall, and can make better decisions from the information they have. 

"Gamers see the world differently," said Appelbaum. "They are able to extract more information from a visual scene."

This study can be found in the June edition of Attention, Perception and Psychophysics.

Source: Science Daily



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Sure, but...
By althaz on 6/12/2013 7:54:15 PM , Rating: 1
Maybe YOU should wake the fuck up. For a lot of people (incuding me), the saving of $20 is MORE than worth it for giving up the right to do something I'll NEVER EVER DO. I've never sold a used game and I've never bought one. I like to keep my games (and it's a LOT easier to keep virtual copies than physical ones).

You are an idealistic moron if you think being able to recoup $10 after spending an extra $20 is a good thing. Spoiler alert: it's not. It's $10 worse.


RE: Sure, but...
By Motoman on 6/13/2013 10:56:42 AM , Rating: 2
You are the poster child for what is wrong with America.

There is never, ever, EVER a valid reason for abdicating a basic right as a citizen of the USA.

There is not one single thing you can say that will justify your assertion. All I can say at this point is please don't procreate, because your mere existence is making the world worse - we sure as f%ck don't need more of you running around. We are well beyond capacity of retards.


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki