backtop


Print 30 comment(s) - last by timothyd97402.. on Jun 16 at 12:17 PM

He added that Palm's technologies are now seen in Apple, Android and Windows devices

Former Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein said that selling Palm to Hewlett-Packard (HP) was a "waste," considering Palm's technologies are now seen in today's most popular devices.

Rubinstein told FierceWireless in an interview that Palm's innovative technologies were lost in the sale to HP, and he would reconsider the Palm/HP sale if he could go back in time. 

"I'm not sure I would have sold the company to HP. That's for sure," said Rubinstein. "Talk about a waste. Not that I had any choice because when you sell a company you don't get to decide that. Obviously, the board and shareholders decide that. If we had known they were just going to shut it down and never really give it a chance to flourish, what would have been the point of selling the company?"

Rubinstein added that Palm's technologies, like multitasking and Synergy, are now seen in mobile operating systems like iOS, Android and Windows Phone. He said it's even said in desktop operating systems like Mac OS X. Palm may have been ahead of its time.


"It's not just mobile platforms," said Rubinstein. "If you look at the notifications on Mac OS X, it looks just like webOS, too. We did a lot of things that were very, very innovative. Obviously, multitasking, notifications, Synergy, how we handled the multiple cards… Our over-the-air updates and mechanism has been updated by everybody. Our whole Synergy concept is now becoming much more common. I don't think anyone has implemented it as well as we did yet, but clearly they're all heading down that direction."

For those who need a refresher, Palm was an American smartphone manufacturer founded in 1992. During its time, the California-based company developed smartphones like the Pre, Pixi, Treo and Centro. It later released its one and only tablet, the TouchPad. Older devices ran the Palm OS Garnet operating system, but webOS was introduced as a replacement in 2009.

In April 2010, Palm was sold to HP for $1.2 billion USD. Rubinstein stuck around after the acquisition, and HP seemed optimistic about its new purchase. 

"Palm's innovative operating system provides an ideal platform to expand HP's mobility strategy and create a unique HP experience spanning multiple mobile connected devices," said Todd Bradley, executive vice president of HP's Personal Systems Group, at the time of the acquisition. "And, Palm possesses significant IP assets and has a highly skilled team. The smartphone market is large, profitable and rapidly growing, and companies that can provide an integrated device and experience command a higher share. Advances in mobility are offering significant opportunities, and HP intends to be a leader in this market."

But a little over a year later, HP said it was discontinuing all production of webOS devices. In August 2012, HP created a wholly-owned subsidiary called Gram, which consisted of Palm's remaining components. 

So what is Rubinstein doing today? 

"I'm on two boards," said Rubinstein. "I'm on Amazon and Qualcomm. And there's a logic behind those two boards. I'm a big believer in mobile and integration of the home, and wearable computing and all that stuff, and having it all tied up in the cloud. There's sort of a common theme across those companies. I think they're uniquely positioned for the future of where things are going. That's how I spend some of my time. I help out some small companies with some time. And I'm taking some time off as well right now."

Source: FierceWireless



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No...
By lagomorpha on 6/12/2013 10:53:26 AM , Rating: 2
And I suppose there's some fundamental difference between "laptops" and "notebooks" as well?


RE: No...
By karimtemple on 6/12/13, Rating: 0
RE: No...
By Motoman on 6/12/2013 11:41:56 AM , Rating: 5
I don't.

Nor between laptops, notebooks, ultrabooks, netbooks, whatever.

They're all laptops of different sizes. Creating a new name for every size of something is sheer stupidity.


RE: No...
By eagle470 on 6/12/2013 11:48:54 AM , Rating: 2
Hey, those marketing people work hard to be that stupid!


RE: No...
By Mitch101 on 6/12/2013 4:20:48 PM , Rating: 2
I sleep better at night without those creepy Palm commercials they ran near the end. Shivers.


RE: No...
By karimtemple on 6/12/2013 12:23:12 PM , Rating: 2
Unless the difference in size alone almost completely changes the ergonomics of the platform, as between a Nexus 4/Nexus 10 or iPhone/iPad. PDA vs. tablet remains valid.


RE: No...
By BRB29 on 6/12/2013 12:35:35 PM , Rating: 2
of course it does
I can't put a nexus 10 to my face or shove it in my pocket. Form does determine function. Anybody who wants to say otherwise might as well call watches clocks.


RE: No...
By augiem on 6/12/2013 10:20:49 PM , Rating: 2
Get bigger pockets.


RE: No...
By GTVic on 6/12/2013 2:14:09 PM , Rating: 2
No, the technology of the time limited the size and capabilities of the device. A PDA is just an early generation mobile device (smartphone, tablet, whatever).


RE: No...
By karimtemple on 6/12/2013 2:35:08 PM , Rating: 2
My PDA had a web browser, more than one choice of office document software -- compatible with MS Office, MPEG-4 video, MP3, games, maps.... pretty much everything. I don't think you really know what you're talking about.


RE: No...
By DT_Reader on 6/12/2013 5:43:55 PM , Rating: 2
I see a distinction between devices like PDAs and tablets and smartphones with touch screens, and laptops and netbooks without them. Also, laptops and netbooks are multi-tasking, while the others generally only run one app at a time.

Frankly, I'd prefer the functionality I had with my Pocket PC back in 2003 running on today's hardware. I think Microsoft in particular has taken giant steps backward. Anyone remember MS Transcriber? That was awesome - if they'd port that to Windows Phone 8 or Surface I'd switch from Android. Heck, Transcriber was way better than what they offered on Windows XP Tablet Edition, so MS has basically blown it in the tablet space since forever.


RE: No...
By vol7ron on 6/15/2013 12:41:15 PM , Rating: 2
So then there's no difference between an Escape, Explorer, Expedition, Excursion, or Mac-10 Truck? They all take gas, have wheels, and drive... they're all just automobiles. Might as well call them all cars?


RE: No...
By timothyd97402 on 6/16/2013 12:17:28 PM , Rating: 2
Give us all a break. In your example, the various sizes of notebook computer all pretty much have the same usage scenario.

A smartphone is a phone, and without jumping through some hoops, a tablet is not a phone. I read books on my tablet and I do not on my phone. The typical usage scenarios are different.

There are now "phablets" and I see that they could help you make your point but most of us do not carry around 7 inch phones and most tablets do not offer 3G voice/data.


RE: No...
By lagomorpha on 6/12/2013 1:14:59 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Well technically there's no fundamental difference between a smartphone and a tablet either,


Yes there is. With the exception of the iPhone, smartphones can be used as phones.


RE: No...
By karimtemple on 6/12/2013 1:51:00 PM , Rating: 2
There are tablets with cell calling enabled. I'm going to need you to try a real rebuttal.


RE: No...
By Just Tom on 6/14/2013 11:57:45 AM , Rating: 2
The rebuttal was fine. Every smart phone IS a cell phone; the vast majority of tablets are not.

They are all computers though...


"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki