Apple, Google Surrender to Patent "Troll"; Vizio and Toshiba Fight It and Win
June 11, 2013 4:17 PM
comment(s) - last by
Patent on thin client computing is shot down in court
Vizio, a top American electronics brand (privately held), has taken down an alleged "patent troll" in what the company's spokesperson hails as the seventh major victory over a troll (also know as a patent assertion entity (PAE) or non-practicing entity (NPE)).
I. Refusing to Settle
The patent in question in the case was U.S. Patent No. 7,035,598, entitled "Modular computer system". Filed in Nov. 2001 and granted in Apr. 2006, the patent was the work of Scott Lochner, who went on to found the company that sued Vizio, Lochner Technologies.
The abstract describes wireless "thin client" technology, which is commonly deployed in corporate IT to save costs and improve mobility. The approach involves running virtual machines on a powerful server backend and then piping the virtual client to inexpensive mobile laptops.
The abstract stating:
A computer system composed of a storage and control unit including components for receiving and processing input data signals and components for producing output signals based on the input data signals; an input/output unit including components for generating input signals and output components for providing a display based on output signals; and a wireless link between the units for conducting data signals from the components for generating input signals to the components for receiving and processing input signals and for conducting output signals from the components for producing output signals to the output components.
Lochner Tech., which does not make computers, then went on to sue virtually every major internet and technology firm in the industry. Vizio's codefendants included 21 other firms, including Apple, Inc. (
), Google Inc. (
), Amazon.com, Inc. (
), Sony Corp. (
), ASUSTek Computer Inc.'s (
), Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
), and LG Electronics, Inc. (
), among others. One of the cases was filed in California federal court; the other was filed in Texas.
Of the defendants almost all settled, with only Vizio and Toshiba Corp. (
) looking to fight the suit.
II. FTW: Vizio Shoots Down Vague Patent
U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
ruled that the patent was partially invalid, on the grounds that its specifications (details of the invention) did not fully describe the claims of the invention (the more abstract, shorter description). In other words, Locner Tech claimed to have "invented" a lot of things via ambiguous catch-alls, but provided little in the way of details.
She explains in her ruling [
], "The specification only demonstrates possession of an input-output system with fewer components than a conventional computer... [T]he claimed invention by contrast places no bounds on the type of components that can enter the input-output system so long as the system remains portable."
Vizio, who was represented in the case by
Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP
, was excited at the outcome, which basically kills Lochner Tech.'s lawsuit.
Comments Jerry Huang, Vizio General Counsel and VP of Legal Affairs in an email to
, "We are gratified that the ill-advised tactics of the patent troll community continue to falter and are being rejected by the U.S. authorities. The Court’s most recent ruling is yet another vindication of VIZIO’s position, in a long list of VIZIO victories in battling patent trolls and the apparent extortion attempts."
Most of Vizio's laptop line was accused of infringing the thin client patent.
"As an intellectual property rights owner, VIZIO respects such rights and their proper exercise. VIZIO has demonstrated its commitment to thwart the advancement of the abusive practices of the patent troll community and shall continue to vigorously defend meritless lawsuits that have no application to VIZIO products"
Lochner can, of course, appeal the invalidation, but such uphill slogs
are seldom successful
(just ask Rambus Inc. (
Congress and the Obama administration recently
reiterated calls to stiffen protections
against patent trolls. Meanwhile, Vermont became the first state to pass a consumer protection act targeting PAEs. Such laws may be helpful in preventing some types of abuse, although they fall short of the underlying problem -- companies
patenting obvious/frivolous "inventions"
the wedge shaped computer
) and patenting things that there's
already near-identical prior art
on (in some cases dozens of patents).
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
6/12/2013 12:38:25 AM
That's why patent trolling works. If you lose, you make millions or even hundreds of millions. If you lose, your patent gets invalidated and you lose about $10k in filing fees + lawyer fees (of which there are none if the patent troll is a lawyer).
6/12/2013 8:16:29 AM
So what happens if you win?
"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il
House Punts on Patent Trolls, Asks FTC to Deal With the Problem
June 7, 2013, 6:54 PM
USPTO Deals Second Strong Blow to Apple's Effort to Patent Bouncing Animations
April 4, 2013, 4:19 PM
Virtually Every Ultrabook Appears to Violate New Apple Patent
June 7, 2012, 2:30 PM
Rambus Patents are Invalidated, Chipmaker-Turned-Litigator is Left with Few Options
January 30, 2012, 3:21 PM
Master of Unlocking: Apple Patents Swipe-to-Unlock Despite Prior Art
October 26, 2011, 3:27 PM
LinkNYC Terminals to Blanket New York City With Free WiFi, Free Calls, and Ads
November 17, 2014, 6:50 PM
Microsoft is Open-Sourcing Most of .NET, Adding OS X and Linux Support
November 12, 2014, 8:27 PM
Home Depot Lost 53 Million Emails, Blames Windows, Buys Execs New Macs
November 9, 2014, 5:00 PM
Former NSA Lawyer: If Google, Apple Encrypt User Data, They’ll Wither on the Vine Like Blackberry
November 6, 2014, 12:15 PM
Report: AT&T Eyeing $40B DirecTV Purchase
May 1, 2014, 8:00 AM
WebOS Class Action Settlement Costs HP $57 Million
April 1, 2014, 10:22 AM
Most Popular Articles
Android-Powered BLU Studio 7.0 Claims to be the "World's Largest Smartphone"
December 19, 2014, 2:40 PM
Paramount Bans Team America Screenings, Cowers Submissively to North Korea
December 18, 2014, 10:26 PM
Miyamoto: Nintendo is Prepping Successor to Troubled Wii U
December 22, 2014, 6:28 PM
Amazon's Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 Drops to $299 (30 Percent Off) for a Day
December 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
News Corp's Fox is Terrified of North Korea, Kills Upcoming Steve Carell Film
December 18, 2014, 4:09 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information