Apple, Google Surrender to Patent "Troll"; Vizio and Toshiba Fight It and Win
June 11, 2013 4:17 PM
comment(s) - last by
Patent on thin client computing is shot down in court
Vizio, a top American electronics brand (privately held), has taken down an alleged "patent troll" in what the company's spokesperson hails as the seventh major victory over a troll (also know as a patent assertion entity (PAE) or non-practicing entity (NPE)).
I. Refusing to Settle
The patent in question in the case was U.S. Patent No. 7,035,598, entitled "Modular computer system". Filed in Nov. 2001 and granted in Apr. 2006, the patent was the work of Scott Lochner, who went on to found the company that sued Vizio, Lochner Technologies.
The abstract describes wireless "thin client" technology, which is commonly deployed in corporate IT to save costs and improve mobility. The approach involves running virtual machines on a powerful server backend and then piping the virtual client to inexpensive mobile laptops.
The abstract stating:
A computer system composed of a storage and control unit including components for receiving and processing input data signals and components for producing output signals based on the input data signals; an input/output unit including components for generating input signals and output components for providing a display based on output signals; and a wireless link between the units for conducting data signals from the components for generating input signals to the components for receiving and processing input signals and for conducting output signals from the components for producing output signals to the output components.
Lochner Tech., which does not make computers, then went on to sue virtually every major internet and technology firm in the industry. Vizio's codefendants included 21 other firms, including Apple, Inc. (
), Google Inc. (
), Amazon.com, Inc. (
), Sony Corp. (
), ASUSTek Computer Inc.'s (
), Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
), and LG Electronics, Inc. (
), among others. One of the cases was filed in California federal court; the other was filed in Texas.
Of the defendants almost all settled, with only Vizio and Toshiba Corp. (
) looking to fight the suit.
II. FTW: Vizio Shoots Down Vague Patent
U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
ruled that the patent was partially invalid, on the grounds that its specifications (details of the invention) did not fully describe the claims of the invention (the more abstract, shorter description). In other words, Locner Tech claimed to have "invented" a lot of things via ambiguous catch-alls, but provided little in the way of details.
She explains in her ruling [
], "The specification only demonstrates possession of an input-output system with fewer components than a conventional computer... [T]he claimed invention by contrast places no bounds on the type of components that can enter the input-output system so long as the system remains portable."
Vizio, who was represented in the case by
Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP
, was excited at the outcome, which basically kills Lochner Tech.'s lawsuit.
Comments Jerry Huang, Vizio General Counsel and VP of Legal Affairs in an email to
, "We are gratified that the ill-advised tactics of the patent troll community continue to falter and are being rejected by the U.S. authorities. The Court’s most recent ruling is yet another vindication of VIZIO’s position, in a long list of VIZIO victories in battling patent trolls and the apparent extortion attempts."
Most of Vizio's laptop line was accused of infringing the thin client patent.
"As an intellectual property rights owner, VIZIO respects such rights and their proper exercise. VIZIO has demonstrated its commitment to thwart the advancement of the abusive practices of the patent troll community and shall continue to vigorously defend meritless lawsuits that have no application to VIZIO products"
Lochner can, of course, appeal the invalidation, but such uphill slogs
are seldom successful
(just ask Rambus Inc. (
Congress and the Obama administration recently
reiterated calls to stiffen protections
against patent trolls. Meanwhile, Vermont became the first state to pass a consumer protection act targeting PAEs. Such laws may be helpful in preventing some types of abuse, although they fall short of the underlying problem -- companies
patenting obvious/frivolous "inventions"
the wedge shaped computer
) and patenting things that there's
already near-identical prior art
on (in some cases dozens of patents).
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
6/11/2013 6:24:03 PM
I wish those companies that gave in and settled with trolls get to pay double, to punish them for their reluctance to fight for what's right.
6/11/2013 7:33:18 PM
How about suing the patent office? If they didn't grant the nonsense patent to begin with none would have settled.
6/12/2013 8:20:17 AM
They didn't make money off any of the patents. They didn't sell or distribute your work.
6/11/2013 7:38:07 PM
Yes, but if they settled for something paltry, like $100k, then double of paltry is
There's no punishment in that case, just nuisance.
"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
House Punts on Patent Trolls, Asks FTC to Deal With the Problem
June 7, 2013, 6:54 PM
USPTO Deals Second Strong Blow to Apple's Effort to Patent Bouncing Animations
April 4, 2013, 4:19 PM
Virtually Every Ultrabook Appears to Violate New Apple Patent
June 7, 2012, 2:30 PM
Rambus Patents are Invalidated, Chipmaker-Turned-Litigator is Left with Few Options
January 30, 2012, 3:21 PM
Master of Unlocking: Apple Patents Swipe-to-Unlock Despite Prior Art
October 26, 2011, 3:27 PM
IBM Workers Strike Over Terms of Deal That Will Have Them Working for Lenovo
March 6, 2014, 9:29 AM
Google Picking Up Artificial Intelligence Company "DeepMind" for $400 Million
January 27, 2014, 9:25 AM
Quick Note: Qualcomm Grabs up Palm, IPAQ, and Bitfone Patent Portfolio from HP
January 24, 2014, 9:18 AM
Verizon Buys Intel Media OnCue Cloud TV assets
January 21, 2014, 10:26 AM
Google's First Asian Data Centers Now Operational
December 11, 2013, 8:50 AM
IBM to Offer Watson Supercomputer as Cloud Development Platform
November 14, 2013, 12:00 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Sony, Panasonic Announce Archival Disc Standard Coming in 2015
March 10, 2014, 8:50 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information