Rep. Ron Paul Calls NSA Spying a Victory for Terrorists, Some Senators Say It's Fine
June 7, 2013 6:46 AM
comment(s) - last by
Meanwhile Verizon Wireless spins its wheels looking to minimize brand damage
The Obama administration, which pens such promises as "
Government Should be Transparent
", offered nary a hint that up to 121 million Americans (on Verizon's network) could be being spied on a "daily basis" under court order by the
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations
U.S. National Security Agency
(NSA). The revelation of its
massive, secret, and utterly non-transparent domestic snooping program
leaked via a British newspaper --
I. Some (D)s and (R)s Have Obama's Back on Spying Issue
In the wake of the administration's latest scandal, some U.S. Senators are defending the program, which allows the NSA to spy on law abiding citizens
without obtaining separate warrants. The ranking Democrat and Republican members of the
Senate Select Committee On Intelligence
both praised the program as "lawful" and said the intelligence agencies had briefed Congress on their actions, which were kept secret from the citizens who voted them into office.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein
, "As far as I know this is the exact three month renewal of what has been the case for the past seven years. This renewal is carried out by the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] court under the business records section of the Patriot Act. Therefore it is lawful. It has been briefed to Congress. [Terrorists] will come after us if they can and the only thing that we have to deter this is good intelligence to understand that a plot has been hatched and to get there before they get to us"
Sen. Saxby Chambliss
(R-Geor.) comments, "This is nothing new. It has proved meritorious because we have gathered significant information on bad guys and only on bad guys over the years."
Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D; left) and Saxby Chambliss (R) both endorse the massive spying program. [Image Source: AP]
He dismisses the data collected -- such as locations of citizens and the numbers they call -- as "simply" metadata.
The Senators comments offer a hint of truth -- the program is thought to have been going on since 2006, when it
report. At the time it was merely a rumor -- no court order had leaked in full. Some dismissed the report as "paranoia". Today we know it to be accurate, thanks to more leaks.
II. Others on Both Sides are Outraged
Sens. Ron Wyden
Rep. Ron Paul
(R-Tex.) have taken a far different view of the program, which they were legally unable to discuss until now under government secrecy laws. In a
to Attorney General Eric Holder, Sens. Wyden and Udall complain, "We believe that most Americans would be stunned to learn the details of how these secret court opinions have interpreted [the PATRIOT Act]."
Ron Paul says that the spying was "certainly not patriotic" and was a victory for terrorists.
[Image Source: AP]
Rep. Ron Paul, a long time advocate for Constitutional freedoms, issued a statement
I wish I could say I was shocked at the reports the NSA is secretly spying on the private phone calls of millions of Verizon customers. However, this is a predictable result of a government that continues to erode our liberties while promising some glimmering hope of security.
The Fourth Amendment is clear; it says we should be secure in our persons, houses, papers and effects, and that all warrants must have probable cause.
I opposed and continue to oppose the Patriot Act because I believe it throws the Fourth Amendment right out the window. It is certainly not patriotic to support warrantless wiretaps, blanket ‘metadata’ collection, and spying on innocent American citizens.
Unfortunately, what is worse than the reports, is knowing that politicians of both parties will continue to defend this practice as necessary to supposedly keep us ‘safe’. We do not have to sacrifice our liberties for security. At times like this, the question must be asked, ‘if we are willing to change our way of life and our very definition of freedom while tolerating the invasive searches at our airports and now of our phone calls, have the terrorists already won?
The seizures were authorized by the Oct. 2001
(Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) Act, and the Bush administration repurposed the NSA to its new role of spying on Americans. Specifically the "business records" (
50 U.S.C. § 1861
) section of the PATRIOT Act gave the feds the ammo to seize these records from the private sector.
Experts close to Congress say that hearings on the topic will likely be held, but they are unlikely to dent the steel facade of the PATRIOT Act. Ultimately, they expect the issue to die down as citizens grow accustomed to the new reality that they are being monitored.
III. Verizon Confirms Snooping Occurred
Another major development was Verizon Wireless -- the joint subsidiary of Verizon Communications Inc. (
) and Vodafone Group Plc.'s (
) -- issuing
an internal statement
aimed at damage control.
In a "private" memo to employees, which of course leaked, the Verizon general counsel Randy Milch comments:
You may have seen stories in the news about a top secret order Verizon allegedly received to produce certain calling information to the U.S. Government.
We have no comment on the accuracy of The Guardian newspaper story or the documents referenced, but a few items in these stories are important. The alleged court order that The Guardian published on its website contains language that compels Verizon to respond, forbids Verizon from revealing the order’s existence and excludes from production the ‘content of any communication … or the name, address, or financial information of a subscriber or customer.'
But Verizon gives as close as it legally can to a confirmation, writing:
[If we] were to receive such an order, we would be required to comply.
Verizon is reportedly irked at the Obama administration for potentially damaging its business due to the report that singles it out in the spying scandal. The
nation's largest carrier
is reportedly circling its wagons, pressuring administration officials to give some sort of a public show of support to the carrier.
Verizon is pushing the feds to defend its image. [Image Source: Julie Jacobson/AP]
The Electronic Frontier Foundation
(EFF) is already examining ways to bring legal actions against the government. The EFF's Cindy Cohn comments, "Nothing in the PATRIOT Act says that millions of innocent Americans can have their phone records turned over to the government."
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
6/7/2013 11:26:43 AM
If you feel Ron Paul is the solution to the federal government like all the other Paulinistas then you should join him and them on the nut wagon. Yes he does have some good ideas, but many others are way out there. It makes me chuckle when one calls into talk radio and you hear them repeat the word constitution 18 times within 2 minutes. All while Ron Paul aggressively takes more earmark money for his constituents and makes no excuses about it.
However, Rand Paul senator of Kentucky seems to has all his screws together. So far he's pretty impressive.
6/9/2013 1:11:21 AM
Earmarking money AFTER voting against the appropriation of it isn't hypocritical. If he doesn't earmark after losing said vote, the money will simply go to another district and not his. Why would he do that?
This is the type of deeper thinking that libertarians exhibit and average people simply cannot grasp. It's the same in economics when people blame banks and wall street, but not the original sin of the federal reserve that enables it. If I'm a business competing with other businesses, I could be opposed to stimulus. But if I don't take gambles with cheap money on projects the government wants stimulated, my competitors surely will. Businesses are there to follow signals in the market as affected by government, not crush their shareholders in noble defiance of financial engineering. Hell, as long as you get big enough, the better more risk becomes. That's the precedent now.
6/10/2013 8:55:59 AM
Ron Paul clearly explains this in his books.
"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Obama Administration Authorized Spying on up to a Third of Americans
June 6, 2013, 11:00 AM
Verizon Earnings Sag, but Posts Record Subscriber Increase Driven by iPhone
January 22, 2013, 3:19 PM
OnePlus Ditches Invite System for 1st-Gen Phone, Will Bring it Back for Round "2"
April 20, 2015, 2:52 PM
Apple Plans In-Store Workshops to Teach Users How to Use Its Smartwatch
April 17, 2015, 1:02 PM
Report: Apple Racks Up Nearly 1M Apple Watch Preorders
April 13, 2015, 3:26 PM
Sharp Unveils World's First "4K" Phone Display at Mind-Boggling 806 PPI
April 13, 2015, 11:24 AM
TSMC Hypes Its Upcoming 10 nm Process, Amid Struggles to Hit Volume at 16 nm
April 10, 2015, 7:57 PM
Samsung 's Galaxy S6, Profit Surprise Overshadow Prolonged Revenue Slump
April 8, 2015, 9:24 AM
Most Popular Articles
Windows 10 Build 10056 -- What's New in the Latest Leak
April 13, 2015, 10:38 PM
Tech's Biggest Loser on Tax Day: eBay Pays Nearly 99 Percent Tax Rate
April 15, 2015, 3:28 PM
Mathematician's Sociological Formulation May Explain the "Hipster Paradox"
April 14, 2015, 1:13 PM
Editorial: TinEye is an Essential Search Engine That Too Few Know About
April 14, 2015, 10:58 PM
Testers Trolled by Promise of Uninstallable Windows 10 Preview Build 10061
April 16, 2015, 2:52 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information