Print 52 comment(s) - last by someguy123.. on Jun 3 at 12:30 AM

Microsoft Xbox One will have at least 15 exclusive games

One of the good things about being the largest software company on the planet is that you have a seriously big checkbook. Given its generous cash position, Microsoft has reportedly spent $1 billion securing exclusive games for the launch of the Xbox One game console.
It's good to hear that Microsoft is spending significant money to secure impressive games for its coming game console after some came away from the unveil of the device with an impression that it was more focused on streaming video and entertainment than gaming.

The $1 billion Microsoft plans to invest in exclusive games will get Xbox One users 15 exclusive titles in the first year the console is available including a few completely new franchises. Microsoft has also spent significant money on beefing up its staff including hiring former Sony exec Phil Harrison to manage internal products and developer relations in Europe.

Rare Ltd is also reportedly working to bring one of its iconic franchises back to gamers in something that Microsoft executives are billing as a "historic" revival. Microsoft is also securing game from Black Task Studios that is said to be an action title designed to compete with Halo and Gears of War.

Another interesting title that has been talked about briefly is called Quantum Break; the trailer for that game turned up a while back and can be viewed here

Source: OXM

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: A commendable move
By SPOOFE on 5/30/2013 4:51:59 PM , Rating: 3
The truth is developers build for their target platform, which is invariably the one with the most installed units.

Only in cases in which one platform is clearly dominant. 360 vs. PS3 is extremely close, and developing for only one platform cuts off almost 50% of potential sales. Even losing out on 20-30% is a consideration not to be taken lightly.

The only thing that balances that out is "exclusives", hence the fat payments from the Big Consoles to make up for that near-50% lost sales potential.

The easier platform being the more powerful platform is a best-case scenario, and that's what we presently have with the PS4. The outcome to expect is fairly clear.

You're clearly not a student of history. Last generation? Weakest console was the winner.

RE: A commendable move
By mcnabney on 5/30/2013 6:52:05 PM , Rating: 2
The platforms are so similar now, the developers can just develop for the PC and just turn down aliasing or detail level to fit each different console platform.

RE: A commendable move
By Bateluer on 5/30/2013 11:04:21 PM , Rating: 2
The Wii made have some more units, but once Nintendo reached market saturation with it, ie, everyone who wanted one had one, they stopped making money off it. The complete lack of games meant that they receive pretty much zilch in royalties, leading to their current dire financial straits.

The X360 and PS3 moved fewer consoles, but the game sales will ensure MS & Sony continue to make money on them even after they've been replaced by the XOne and PS4.

RE: A commendable move
By jabber on 5/31/2013 6:47:36 AM , Rating: 2
I remember a quote from one of the editors of a big games review website. The reviewers would almost fight to review the 360/PS3 games and whomever lost the fight would have to review the Wii games.

No one wanted to review the Wii games.

RE: A commendable move
By karimtemple on 5/31/2013 8:42:33 AM , Rating: 2
360 vs. PS3 is extremely close
And once again, when it's close the target development platform tends to become the one that's easier to develop for.

In the beginning that was the 360, by far. After several years, the PS3 became a lot easier to develop for than before, and it also surpassed the 360 in software tie ratio for North America. Accordingly, we began to see more multiplatform games coming out last year that were ported from the PS3, not to.
Last generation? Weakest console was the winner.
The weakest console was the Wii. The software tie ratio was lower and the prices were lower. It generally was not the target platform for AAA titles.

RE: A commendable move
By jabber on 5/31/2013 7:41:28 PM , Rating: 2
I dont think many folks consider the Wii to really be alongside the 360 and PS3.

Say the 360 and PS3 were Gen 3.0 well Wii was kinds Gen 2.5.

Like the Wii U is Gen 3.5.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Related Articles

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki